On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We can always complete this in future.
> > Also if you apply the suggested fix, you can add more info later,
> > there is nothing wrong with the current information.
> > Anyway, it improves current state.
>
> No, it doesn't. Actually, it
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:45:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:18, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > 1. Move main() out of s2ram.c into s2ram-main.c, this will enable s2ram.o
> > to be included
> > in both s2ram and s2both without recompilation.
> >
> > 2. Split white
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 09:34, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We can always complete this in future.
> > > Also if you apply the suggested fix, you can add more info later,
> > > there is nothing wrong with the current information.
> > > Anywa
On 8/4/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't care too much, although i think this is much too much
> actually changed code for just "automake conversion". I mean -
> this is configuration stuff, why do we need to reorder whitelist.[hc]?
>
> I guess i know the answer - and now you
On Saturday 04 August 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello Rafael,
>
> This is *UNTESTED* suggestion for switching into lzo without the memcpy.
> Please see if I missed something as I the code combination of global
> variables,
> local memory pool and unrelated sizes is difficult to understand/ma
This allows you to specify an array of config_par, ending it with NULL
name, so that you don't have to calculate the number of entries manually.
Alon
---
--- suspend.org/configparser.h 2007-05-13 20:53:13.0 +0300
+++ suspend.work/configparser.h 2007-08-04 04:58:08.0 +0300
@@ -1
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:45:20 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. Split whitelist.c into whitelist.h/whitelist.c as including .c is none
> > standard/unsupported.
>
> These changes have to be looked at by Pavel and Stefan.
At some point I suggested this too. Pavel was so
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:45:20 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. Move main() out of s2ram.c into s2ram-main.c, this will enable s2ram.o
> > to be included
> > in both s2ram and s2both without recompilation.
That way we get even more s2ram-* files. In s2ram.c there would no
On 8/4/07, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:45:20 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > 1. Move main() out of s2ram.c into s2ram-main.c, this will enable s2ram.o
> > > to be included
> > > in both s2ram and s2both without recompilation.
>
> T
Hello,
This patch adds --splash argument to s2both, s2disk, resume.
It is required especially for resume when you want to disable splash in
initramfs
as result of kernel parameter, even if it usually turned on on suspend.conf you
wish to turn it off.
This is handy if you get oops or cannot boot
On Friday 03 August 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to make migration to autoconf/automake easy I've made
> a series of patches that preparing the environment to incremental
> migration.
>
> Please review this quickly so I won't have to rebase my work over
> and over.
>
> Best Re
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6~cvs20070618-1
Severity: minor
Tags: forwarded
Hi,
[readers of the uswsusp list, please forgive the cruft
associated with filing a bug with the Debian BTS]
I have a shiny new Dell Precision M90 laptop, and much to my
pleasant surprise, both s
12 matches
Mail list logo
