On Saturday, 4 August 2007 09:34, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We can always complete this in future. > > > Also if you apply the suggested fix, you can add more info later, > > > there is nothing wrong with the current information. > > > Anyway, it improves current state. > > > > No, it doesn't. Actually, it is confusing, because copyright is not the > > same > > thing as a license. > > > > If you refer to licenses and then only provide the copyright information, > > that > > is plain _wrong_ and makes things worse than they are right now. > > No. > You are wrong. > You re-license the whole package using a single license (GPL-2 license). > You cannot say s2disk is GPL-2, but md5 is X, but I've released s2disk > as GPL-2 anyway. > If you use incompatible/conflicting licenses for dependencies -- you > just cannot use them. > While the copyright of individuals stays in effect.
Well, excuse me, but we do _not_ relicense LZF or gcrypt etc. They are libraries and we use them. We don't even distribute that code! > But I don't care... This is your project. Frankly, I'm a bit tired of this kind of attitude. If you don't care, please respect my limited time and don't waste it. Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
