On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We can always complete this in future. > > Also if you apply the suggested fix, you can add more info later, > > there is nothing wrong with the current information. > > Anyway, it improves current state. > > No, it doesn't. Actually, it is confusing, because copyright is not the same > thing as a license. > > If you refer to licenses and then only provide the copyright information, that > is plain _wrong_ and makes things worse than they are right now.
No. You are wrong. You re-license the whole package using a single license (GPL-2 license). You cannot say s2disk is GPL-2, but md5 is X, but I've released s2disk as GPL-2 anyway. If you use incompatible/conflicting licenses for dependencies -- you just cannot use them. While the copyright of individuals stays in effect. But I don't care... This is your project. Alon. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
