subject. Dispensationalists are also easily identified by negatives -
what you don't see them doing is talking a lot about such basic
Christian tenets as God is Love for instance, or the Sermon on the
Mount, let alone practising such things, quite the opposite.
This view is neither
(The shifting sands of truth)
There are some web pages that have tried to keep count, but it's a tough
job. Funny how people don't notice, isn't it? I suppose Lakoff's
explanation holds good (though he's not in very good odour right now,
and he wasn't at all the first to observe this:
One
Dear Robert,
Thanks for your comments. They are vary helpful. I'm not sure I
understand this Neo Con Dispensationalist principle but I also have
to confess I don't understand the Neo Cons all that well.
Not all NeoCons are dispensationalists, nor are all
dispensationalists NeoCons,
Hi All,
Please do not misunderstand my point about Korea. I do not want my country
to invade North Korea. (I never want the U.S. to invade anyone) I have many
friends in the South whose lives would be destroyed. I was comparing the
relative threat between the leaders of Iraq and North Korea
. or else he points elsewhere, no?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Rick Littrell
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/7/05 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Iraq Invasion - Age of Oil Scarcity
Dear Tom,
These are excellent points. In the case of France though the German
army was a bit more
relative to U.S.
security.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: robert luis rabello
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/7/05 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Iraq Invasion - Age of Oil Scarcity
Rick Littrell wrote:
Dear Tom,
These are excellent points. In the case of France though the German
army
Thanks for your comments. They are vary helpful. I'm not sure I
understand this Neo Con Dispensationalist principle but I also have
to confess I don't understand the Neo Cons all that well. Do you think
the is a political philosophy here or is it just another name for
business
On Apr 8, 2005, at 12:25 PM, Rick Littrell wrote:
I guess the most important questions for me are how much of the
administrations positions
on environment are philosophical and how much pragmatic. As several
people have pointed
out the collapse of cheap energy i.e., oil and gas will
Keith Addison wrote:
(Iraqi forces)
There wasn't much left of them by that time, which I think was the idea.
This was one of my contentions in the lead up to the war.
How can a nation whose armed forces have been decimated constitute a
threat in the traditional, military sense? Our
? There's no oil
there.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Rick Littrell
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/5/05 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Iraq Invasion - Age of Oil Scarcity
Dear Scott,
I think the thesis here is a bit of a reach. At the time of the
invasion the dollar was not in the shape
Iraq Invasion May Be Remembered as
Start of the Age of Oil Scarcity
By Robert Collier
San Francisco Chronicle
Sunday 20 March 2005
http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/032105EA.shtml
Production tumbles in post-Hussein era as
more countries vie for shrinking supplies
...
If it weren't for
national threat, we'ed be in North Korea. Why aren't we there?
There's certainly weapons of mass destruction? WHY? WHY? WHY? There's no oil
there.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Rick Littrell
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/5/05 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Iraq Invasion - Age of Oil
Dear Tom,
These are excellent points. In the case of France though the German
army was a bit more of a challenge than the Iraq army, the French
actually wanted us there.
You bring up something interesting, Rick. I would like to clarify,
however, that the German troops we Americans
Rick Littrell wrote:
Dear Tom,
These are excellent points. In the case of France though the
German army was a bit more of a challenge than the Iraq army, the
French actually wanted us there.
You bring up something interesting, Rick. I would like to
clarify, however, that the German
Iraq Invasion May Be Remembered as
Start of the Age of Oil Scarcity
By Robert Collier
San Francisco Chronicle
Sunday 20 March 2005
http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/032105EA.shtml
Production tumbles in post-Hussein era as
more countries vie for shrinking supplies
Instead of
How many of us had an AHA moment when reading this article?
We now see the real reason for this illegal war [or at least one of the
reasons].
Saddam Hussein was about to be given a clean bill of health by the UN
inspection team beacuse he obviously didn't have WMD's. He was then going
to open
One way of looking at is the increased price of petroleum
satisfies the oil bosses desires for profits and possibly
the decreased demand for petroleum products from the public
without increasing taxes to discourage its use sometime in
the future.
Is their any truth to the increased demand
I think the thesis here is a bit of a reach. At the time of the
invasion the dollar was not in the shape it is now. In fact one reason
for the decline is the cost of the war. I still lean to the theory
that Sadam was seen as a threat to the region and eventually would
threaten US access
18 matches
Mail list logo
