Re: [Biofuel] Pollution Is Called a Byproduct of a 'Clean' Fuel

Hi Olivier This is big business. There's a lot of money involved. Small is beautifuel, said Pagandai. Big is agrofuel, not beautifuel. I have a niggling feeling that 10 years from now, the environmentalists will be fighting the ethanol industry tooth and nail. Anything can be done badly, and

Re: [Biofuel] Pollution: Where have all the baby boys gone?

Wow. Okay, I'm on it. Geoffrey Lean, wasn't he our boy in Washington for the Independant? What's he doing in Sarnia, not to be nosey. Jesse From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 01:15:48 +0900 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Re: [Biofuel] Pollution: Where have all the baby boys gone?

Hi Jesse Wow. Okay, I'm on it. Geoffrey Lean, wasn't he our boy in Washington for the Independant? I don't think so, IIRC he used to cover environment for the Guardian. What's he doing in Sarnia, not to be nosey. Chasing girls? :-) Jesse Here's the whole report:

Re: [biofuel] pollution

/humanpower.htm [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Greg and April [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:40 PM Subject: Re: [biofuel] pollution I wish that they would make up there minds, not enough ozone or to much. Greg H. - Original

Re: [biofuel] pollution

junk science. ignore it. Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter: http://www.webconx.com/subscribe.htm Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.dns2go.com/ Human powered devices, equipment, and transport - http://24.190.106.81:8383/2000/humanpower.htm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [biofuel] pollution

If you see the dateline on this story it is over a year old.. It was discussed widely on this forum and others at the time. See the archives for a full meltdown - the testing was flawed . note the paragraph In the study, scientists burned rapeseed oil at temperatures equivalent to those in a

Re: [biofuel] pollution

I wish that they would make up there minds, not enough ozone or to much. Greg H. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 21:19 Subject: [biofuel] pollution this is not a promising thought.

Re: [biofuel] pollution

:42 -0700 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [biofuel] pollution I wish that they would make up there minds, not enough ozone or to much. Greg H. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 21:19 Subject: [biofuel] pollution

Re: [biofuel] Pollution-free car

you are correct on the units, although my point is still valid. batteries absorb and release more net electric than the whole electrolysis process. with electrolysis, 1 kwh into the electrolyzer, gives you less than 1/3 out of the fuel cell. batteries are 70%+ (at the c20 rate, with 50% DOD)

RE: [biofuel] Pollution-free car

I don't think autos even run at c10. They load like crazy with resultant loss. c/2 if range done in 1 hour right? Kirk -Original Message- From: steve spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 8:25 AM To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [biofuel] Pollution-free

Re: [biofuel] Pollution-free car

Hi Marc and All, - Original Message - From: F. Marc de Piolenc [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. You'd be darned lucky to actually store 80% of the generated juice in a battery - or rather, you might store 80%, but you won't get that much back and still have reasonable battery life.