Re: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread

2004-07-29 Thread Appal Energy
Gee!!! Damn am I glad that I kept my tongue in check, although not in cheek. Next thing I know somone would be calling me arachnidic, palmitic, phosphoric, sulfuric or some other such. Just kidding. Although I always have equated acerbic with acidic. Sorry. I just hate whiners that offer no

Re: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread

2004-07-29 Thread Keith Addison
Gee!!! Well, good grief... Anyway, sorry. Damn am I glad that I kept my tongue in check, although not in cheek. Next thing I know somone would be calling me arachnidic, palmitic, phosphoric, sulfuric or some other such. Golly... What's arachnidic, a spider with acne? LOL! Arachidonic, it says

RE: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread

2004-07-29 Thread Bryan Brah
Ok Keith. I read the OPEC thread, and within it was a lucid discussion of (among other things) the exact Kerry/Bush dilemma of which I lamented. I also read the Moderator's message and your posts on this thread. Would you like for me to respond point by point to your last reply, or will it

RE: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread

2004-07-29 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Bryan Ok Keith. I read the OPEC thread, and within it was a lucid discussion of (among other things) the exact Kerry/Bush dilemma of which I lamented. I also read the Moderator's message and your posts on this thread. Would you like for me to respond point by point to your last

Arachidic Acid was Re: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread

2004-07-29 Thread Appal Energy
by volume. Probably not minor in the estimation of plants and animals. Todd Swearingen - Original Message - From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread Gee!!! Well, good

[biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread

2004-07-28 Thread Bryan Brah
The point of my previous message was obviously misconstrued, and I apologize for my lack of clarity. What I was trying to say is that if you oppose the war in Iraq, then voting for John Kerry will not solve your problems. Even so, I will attempt to address the three responses to my previous

Re: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread - was: DUBYA aint texan nor is his dad

2004-07-28 Thread MH
Bryan Brah wrote: The point of my previous message was obviously misconstrued, and I apologize for my lack of clarity. What I was trying to say is that if you oppose the war in Iraq, then voting for John Kerry will not solve your problems. I can't help wonder how many more wars does

Re: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread

2004-07-28 Thread Appal Energy
27, 2004 11:51 AM Subject: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread The point of my previous message was obviously misconstrued, and I apologize for my lack of clarity. What I was trying to say is that if you oppose the war in Iraq, then voting for John Kerry will not solve your problems. Even

Re: [biofuel] Responses to Dubya thread

2004-07-28 Thread Keith Addison
Bryan The point of my previous message was obviously misconstrued, I don't think so. and I apologize for my lack of clarity. What I was trying to say is that if you oppose the war in Iraq, then voting for John Kerry will not solve your problems. That's part of what you said, it wasn't