The point of my previous message was obviously misconstrued, and I
apologize for my lack of clarity.  What I was trying to say is that if
you oppose the war in Iraq, then voting for John Kerry will not solve
your problems.  Even so, I will attempt to address the three responses
to my previous post.  

 

Keith, this list is an excellent source of information, both political,
and biofuel related, however most of it is "news."  This happened, that
didn't happen, the administration did this, a representative said that,
so-and-so paid so-and-so, etc.  Oftentimes political articles and posts
stimulate a discussion that devolves into "get Bush out."  While that
may be a legitimate solution to many problems, it won't solve America's
current foreign policy crisis.  And that was my point.  I don't believe
that every non-American on this list (or in the world) hates America,
nor do I believe that posts providing negative information about
goings-on are necessarily criticism.  As you said the problem of the
polarization of American politics is very complex, the origins of which
predate the republic (federalists vs. anti-federalists).   I still
contend that the duocracy "debate" is merely a red herring, but since so
many people believe the lie of the two-party system, it is a problem
nonetheless.  Aside from taking up arms the only thing we can really do
is educate ourselves and others about what's going on, and maybe enough
people will figure out that they're getting screwed and say "enough!"
Unfortunately this process is maddeningly arduous (and frustrating).    

 

MH, the basis of the American Republic is rooted in John Locke's
Treatises of Liberty (i.e. life liberty and property, which the founders
changed to "pursuit of happiness" in the interest of enlisting the
support of un-landed citizens).  What this really means is that our
government was designed to protect property rights and maintain status
quo.  The situation that we have in this country is that less than 20
percent of the people control more than 80 percent of the wealth and
less than one half of one percent controls over half of the wealth.  The
myth of "government by the people for the people" is a fiction that they
teach us in public school to keep us complacent.  It is logical and
reasonable to conclude then that those who have more property (money)
have more access to the government and more influence over government
policy, and that those with less property (money) will have less access
and influence.  "Our" government is therefore more accurately a
government "by the rich for the rich."  It doesn't matter which party
you support because in the end it will bow to the needs of the patrons
who support it.  To try and say that Kerry is less in the pocket of BIG
money than Shrub is silly.  He may be more sophisticated, but he's
married to Teresa Heinz for crying out loud. Likewise does being a
Democrat make Senator Jay Rockefeller any less a Rockefeller?  No it
doesn't.  So while these obscenely rich people parade around wearing a
blue jacket or a red jacket, it doesn't make them any less rich, and it
certainly doesn't stop them from protecting what's theirs. 

 

Todd, Todd, Todd.  I thought we were over all this.   As I've stated
REPEATEDLY, the only way that we can hope to gain even a modicum of
control over our government is to participate.  And that doesn't mean
just showing up on Tuesday to flip a switch or punch a chad.  It means
following every city council meeting, attending public hearings, voting
in school board elections, writing your state representatives, paying
attention to how your federal representatives are voting and letting
them know how you feel, and generally being involved as much as
possible.  This is our DUTY as citizens, and it can make a difference,
but unfortunately not on the Federal executive level.  If anything the
2000 election should show you that it doesn't matter which candidate you
vote for, because someone else chooses the President.  As far as my call
for recommendations is concerned, you personal attack didn't offer a
solution to our pickle.  Namely, we have a pro-war jackass in office,
and another pro-war jackass attempting to unseat him.  In the end we'll
still end up with a pro-war jackass as president.  So "bright boy,"
instead of attacking me why don't you shut your stinking cake hole
before I shut it for you?

 

-BRAH 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to