> Bryan Brah wrote: > The point of my previous message was obviously misconstrued, and I > apologize for my lack of clarity. What I was trying to say is that if > you oppose the war in Iraq, then voting for John Kerry will not solve > your problems.
I can't help wonder how many more wars does the Bush Administration have up their sleeve in yellow cake or oil rich regions around the world in the name of terror using that "darn good intelligence" Dubya feels he receives with a supportive GOP majority in the U.S. media and Congress. "And finally, in the world at large we cannot lead if our leaders mislead." -- U.S. President Jimmy Carter, July 26, 2004 As far as I know most people are concerned about money even the GOP candidates & G.W. Bush who aren't bashful about whom they favor or cater to as we've read. It's time for a change, Go Johnny go... GO! Whomever you support, Good Luck! > MH, the basis of the American Republic is rooted in John Locke's > Treatises of Liberty (i.e. life liberty and property, which the founders > changed to "pursuit of happiness" in the interest of enlisting the > support of un-landed citizens). What this really means is that our > government was designed to protect property rights and maintain status > quo. The situation that we have in this country is that less than 20 > percent of the people control more than 80 percent of the wealth and > less than one half of one percent controls over half of the wealth. The > myth of "government by the people for the people" is a fiction that they > teach us in public school to keep us complacent. It is logical and > reasonable to conclude then that those who have more property (money) > have more access to the government and more influence over government > policy, and that those with less property (money) will have less access > and influence. "Our" government is therefore more accurately a > government "by the rich for the rich." It doesn't matter which party > you support because in the end it will bow to the needs of the patrons > who support it. To try and say that Kerry is less in the pocket of BIG > money than Shrub is silly. He may be more sophisticated, but he's > married to Teresa Heinz for crying out loud. Likewise does being a > Democrat make Senator Jay Rockefeller any less a Rockefeller? No it > doesn't. So while these obscenely rich people parade around wearing a > blue jacket or a red jacket, it doesn't make them any less rich, and it > certainly doesn't stop them from protecting what's theirs. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
