Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Leonard
"C.E. Forman" wrote: > > >So I'm actually not surprised that anyone who "collects" > >anything has a slight bit of a neurological disorder. > > It would explain a lot of odd, quirkish behavior. And I myself am mildly > obsessive-compulsive in other areas of my life besides collecting. I think

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread C.E. Forman
>So I'm actually not surprised that anyone who "collects" >anything has a slight bit of a neurological disorder. It would explain a lot of odd, quirkish behavior. And I myself am mildly obsessive-compulsive in other areas of my life besides collecting. >I purchase 2 of everything: 1 to appreci

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Leonard
"C.E. Forman" wrote: > > > Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder seems to fit the bill more. Unless you're > > grabbing them to resell or trade, or for parts, why would you want more > > than 2 (1 to appreciate, the other as a backup) of the same product? > > I know of one (Infocom) collector in German

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread C.E. Forman
> Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder seems to fit the bill more. Unless you're > grabbing them to resell or trade, or for parts, why would you want more > than 2 (1 to appreciate, the other as a backup) of the same product? I know of one (Infocom) collector in Germany who collects one version of each

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread C.E. Forman
Plus every Moonstone in Ultima VI is a little bit different. Thus you're getting a unique item with each copy you obtain! B-) - Original Message - From: Hugh Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:47 AM Subject: RE: [SWCollect] trademark for coll

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Leonard
Pedro Quaresma wrote: > > Hugh Falk wrote, > >Well, there is one other valid reason. Let's say that only 100,000 Ultima > >IV's where ever produced (for the sake of a round number). And let's say > >that half of those have been thrown away, lost or otherwise damaged beyond > >recognition. That

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Leonard
Pedro Quaresma wrote: > > Jim Leonard wrote: > >Pedro Quaresma wrote: > > > > I thought of "habyt", "hobit", but ended up with "hobbyt", how does it > > sound? > > >Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder seems to fit the bill more. > > You have just stated that about 50% of game collectors in the world,

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Leonard
Hugh Falk wrote: > > Well, there is one other valid reason. Let's say that only 100,000 Ultima > IV's where ever produced (for the sake of a round number). And let's say > that half of those have been thrown away, lost or otherwise damaged beyond > recognition. That means that if you own 5 of

RE: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Hugh Falk
Absolutely I would buy them all! However, I would likely use 90% of them as trade material to get other games I wanted. But that would be the only reason I buy something I already own...because I can get something else I want...eventually. Hugh -Original Message- From: Pedro Quaresma [

RE: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Pedro Quaresma
Hugh Falk wrote, >Well, there is one other valid reason. Let's say that only 100,000 Ultima >IV's where ever produced (for the sake of a round number). And let's say >that half of those have been thrown away, lost or otherwise damaged beyond >recognition. That means that if you own 5 of them,

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Pedro Quaresma
Jim Leonard wrote: >Pedro Quaresma wrote: > > I thought of "habyt", "hobit", but ended up with "hobbyt", how does it > sound? >Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder seems to fit the bill more. You have just stated that about 50% of game collectors in the world, and including reknown ones like Jason P.

RE: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Hugh Falk
Well, there is one other valid reason. Let's say that only 100,000 Ultima IV's where ever produced (for the sake of a round number). And let's say that half of those have been thrown away, lost or otherwise damaged beyond recognition. That means that if you own 5 of them, then you own .0001% of

Re: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Leonard
Pedro Quaresma wrote: > > I thought of "habyt", "hobit", but ended up with "hobbyt", how does it > sound? Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder seems to fit the bill more. Unless you're grabbing them to resell or trade, or for parts, why would you want more than 2 (1 to appreciate, the other as a backu

RE: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Pedro Quaresma
>I think it's too Tolkeinesque. My company is looking into a game based on >the Lord of the Rings...believe it or not, the caretakers of the Tolken >estate would probably slap you with a cease and desist if this ever became >"official!" Sad but true!:-) > >Hugh But in this case the name has ab

RE: [SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Hugh Falk
I think it's too Tolkeinesque. My company is looking into a game based on the Lord of the Rings...believe it or not, the caretakers of the Tolken estate would probably slap you with a cease and desist if this ever became "official!" Sad but true!:-) Hugh -Original Message- From: Pedro

[SWCollect] trademark for collectors

2001-07-02 Thread Pedro Quaresma
Hello again, Something recently occurred to me, about collectors likes us (at least I fall under the following category): I collect RPGs as a hobby (nothing new here), the same way others collect adventures, Infocom games, EA flats, etc. Right? Right. But some of us know that it isn't just a hob

Re: [SWCollect] hypothetical question

2001-07-02 Thread C.E. Forman
>From what I can tell (screenshots on the back, as I don't have a working C64 yet) the game is the same, just with a few minor details changed: Mars instead of Titan, there's a code wheel in the EA version versus a secret dossier in Infocom's, etc. - Original Message - From: Pedro Quaresm

Re: [SWCollect] hypothetical question

2001-07-02 Thread Pedro Quaresma
CE Forman wrote: >Speaking of Infocom boxes: does anybody know if Mines of Titan was ever >released in a Gray Box? >No, as Infocom wasn't even publishing the grey boxes by that time (1989). >Even a couple of years prior, their text games had moved to the slipcased >style. > >However, Mines was p