Hey all,
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3062902605category=11050
Intresting, butany chance this is a
fake?
Brad
Why
would you think it's a fake? That version of Ultima was released after Ultima 3,
IIRC. It can't be THAT rare...
Stuart
-Original Message-From: B.L.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, December
10, 2003 6:28 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[SWCollect] ultima 1
I didn't really think it was fake, I was just
entertaining the posibility. Because of it's popularity, the Ultima series
hasfallen victim to somefaked items on ebay in the past; this one
looks fine to me, was just double-checking with the knowledgable to see if
perhaps someone sees
In a message dated 12/10/2003 5:52:56 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why would you think it's a fake? That version of Ultima was released after Ultima 3, IIRC. It can't be THAT rare...
Fairly rare shrinked new, and highly in demand, even an unsealed UI 1986 rerelease
Thanks Tom for the info ;)
Brad
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 7:51
PM
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] ultima 1 sealed
on ebay
In a
message dated 12/10/2003 5:52:56 PM Central Standard Time,
I recognize the seller, he's bought from me before,
plus he's got a bunch of other good items up. I'd say it's far more likely the shrinkwrap job would be non-original
than the box. But this seems like the real deal, it's got the shrink seal
on 3 sides, like my sealed Origin Ring Quest.
B.L. wrote:
I didn't really think it was fake, I was just entertaining the
posibility. Because of it's popularity, the Ultima series has fallen
victim to some faked items on ebay in the past; this one looks fine to
me, was just double-checking with the knowledgable to see if perhaps
someone
In a message dated 12/10/2003 9:23:29 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the one that shows the top edge, you can see box wear on one
edge of the box. I'm 99% sure this is a re-wrap.
Hmm, I don't know, if the holes in the wrap he mentions are the small circular holes I've
C.E. Forman wrote:
So can originals, the 3 sides alone doesn't prove it's a rewrap.
This is true.
Personally I thought this looked more like the light reflecting off the wrap
on small ridges (for lack of a better term). The seller himself says
there is no wear (he is specific, not using the
