Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-30 Diskussionsfäden Scott Weeks
--- g...@space.net wrote: From: Gert Doering To: Scott Weeks On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 02:53:41PM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote: > I was not around for those discussions (and not being a computer > science person, nor wanting to go on this for too long as

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-30 Diskussionsfäden Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 02:53:41PM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote: > I was not around for those discussions (and not being a computer > science person, nor wanting to go on this for too long as has been > endlessly done on other lists), but it seems TLV would have allowed > 4 to be a subset of

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-29 Diskussionsfäden Scott Weeks
--- g...@space.net wrote: From: Gert Doering On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:57:54PM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote: > Yeah, it's quite unfortunate that IPv4 ran out so suddenly, > barely 15 years after people were told to move towards IPv6. > --- > >

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-29 Diskussionsfäden Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:57:54PM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote: > Yeah, it's quite unfortunate that IPv4 ran out so suddenly, > barely 15 years after people were told to move towards IPv6. > --- > > > Especially after IETF made it backwards compatible and

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-29 Diskussionsfäden Scott Weeks
--- g...@space.net wrote: From: Gert Doering Yeah, it's quite unfortunate that IPv4 ran out so suddenly, barely 15 years after people were told to move towards IPv6. --- Especially after IETF made it backwards compatible and made it so

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-29 Diskussionsfäden WolfSec-Support
>> Yeah, it's quite unfortunate that IPv4 ran out so suddenly, barely 15 years >> after people were told to move towards IPv6. sad but true 2017-10-29 10:33 GMT+01:00 Gert Doering : > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 10:32:03AM +0100, WolfSec-Support wrote: > > The vpn needs

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-29 Diskussionsfäden Gert Doering
Hi, On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 10:32:03AM +0100, WolfSec-Support wrote: > The vpn needs to run on v4 > Its not site 2 site in this case. > > As all know it is still rare to get v6 access everywhere > > But in general it would be better if an ISP informs the customer BEFORE > such a change. > > To

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-29 Diskussionsfäden WolfSec-Support
The vpn needs to run on v4 Its not site 2 site in this case. As all know it is still rare to get v6 access everywhere But in general it would be better if an ISP informs the customer BEFORE such a change. To implement CGN without making sure the customer gets a notice was simply the root of the

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-29 Diskussionsfäden WolfSec-Support
Roger Well you are wrong. No ipsec. With CGN outbound for sure no prob. But inbound due to CG NAT impossible. Br Stephan Am 28.10.2017 17:32 schrieb "Roger Schmid" : Well i only suspecting your try to use ipsec, wich is a crazy vpn solution. I would sugest to evaluate ssl

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-28 Diskussionsfäden Roger Schmid
Well i only suspecting your try to use ipsec, wich is a crazy vpn solution. I would sugest to evaluate ssl based vpn in the future which naturally do not run into nat problems. Just my five cents Em 27 de outubro de 2017 03:00:18 AMT, WolfSec-Support escreveu: >Hello, > >

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-27 Diskussionsfäden WolfSec-Support
SOLVED: many thanks to all @ swisscom who helped me issue solved. for propperness: it was CG NAT, not ds-lite (I had a week ago an issue with UPC and ds-lite; so was my fault) now back to dual stack and all works :) have a nice weekend, cheers stephan 2017-10-27 9:00 GMT+02:00

[swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

2017-10-27 Diskussionsfäden WolfSec-Support
Hello, could be someone from swisscom so kind and contact me offlist via email please. our customer has a swisscom dsl connection and last week they changed these to v6. he already tried 3 times via swisscom helpdesk without success. the first level seems to have no idea about ds lite and v6...