Hi Xaver,
I had a similar problem when I set up the mail server on
my virtual server and wanted to send mail to domains that
are hosted by zoneedit.com.
After searching a while, I think this is the way how it works:
Step 1:
==
Bluewin does a reverse DNS lookup on your IP (195.141.232.78),
Hi,
Bluewin does a reverse DNS lookup on your IP (195.141.232.78),
..yes
Bluewin does a normal forward DNS lookup, using the result from the
above query.
we don't.
The resolver implementation of our MTA software appears to have a problem
with truncated UDP responses.
(Btw: Why do you have
Franco Hug wrote:
Step 1:
==
Bluewin does a reverse DNS lookup on your IP (195.141.232.78),
which returns the following:
# nslookup
195.141.232.78
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
Server: www.multipop.ch.
Address:195.141.232.253#53
78.232.141.195.in-addr.arpa
Step 1:
==
Bluewin does a reverse DNS lookup on your IP (195.141.232.78), which
returns the following:
# nslookup
195.141.232.78
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
Server: www.multipop.ch.
Address:195.141.232.253#53
78.232.141.195.in-addr.arpa name =
The Problem is we have on this IP 30 Domains...
When I must have for everery Domain an IP for the reverse of Bluewin is a
big Problem...
I must have in future an A Net...
I think Bluewin must fix this.
Greetings
X. Aerni
- Original Message -
From: Franco Hug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
you can just take another name for the mailserver of these domains -
only one for all
so you have one PTR Record, pointing to mailserver.domain
then you can use the same domainname for mailserver on the others 29
Domains. this fixes this problem
Silvan
Am 26.03.2008 um 13:45 schrieb
...
This is a silly reverse setup. A reverse lookup should only return one
hostname, not 20.
...
Well, tend to agree.
What about the most stupid wanabe Spam-fighter which are very unhappy as in
place (e.g. the third-party service provider systems
acting with some SC subsidiaries...) which
Hi Kurt,
On 26.03.2008, at 15:03, Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
...
This is a silly reverse setup. A reverse lookup should only return
one
hostname, not 20.
...
What about the most stupid wanabe Spam-fighter which are very
unhappy as in place (e.g. the third-party service provider systems
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
...
This is a silly reverse setup. A reverse lookup should only return
one hostname, not 20.
...
Well, tend to agree.
What about the most stupid wanabe Spam-fighter which are very unhappy
as in place (e.g. the third-party service provider systems acting with
On the Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:57:46PM +0100, Adrian Ulrich blubbered:
Hoi.
The resolver implementation of our MTA software appears to have a problem
with truncated UDP responses.
(Btw: Why do you have such a lenghty PTR record for 195.141.232.78 ?)
I may be wrong, but doesn't DNS use TCP if
On the Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 02:42:36PM +0100, Tonnerre Lombard blubbered:
Hoi.
1. it is highly unlikely that these stupid wannabe SPAM filters get the
response containing so many PTR records right. It is most likely
that either the software blows up or that it only ever considers the
11 matches
Mail list logo
