Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> One of my customers has just been told he needs to pay to get a DNS
>> reverse map entry for thei Green ADSL line with fixed IP.
>> Is that really true??
>
> I had a similar query l
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> Anyway, who's going to send email directly from a broadband
> connection, instead of using the ISP's relay? :-)
>
Provided everything is properly set up, why shouldn't they?
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
__
everse mapping to be set up properly.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
.
I dunno - those are two big if's, and neither makes much of a reason for
not sending email directly. I think it's fairly safe to say that
_nobody_ is notified automagically just because an IP is added to some
arbitrary blacklist.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
e is proportional to the number of times it's been reviewed, then
yes, open source is quite possibly more secure.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg ZH
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
> Salut, Per,
>
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:01:24 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> fixing something yourself is also pretty much an illusion, except for
>> those few people who are sufficiently involved. When have you last
>> _had_ to fix anything your
it's certainly one of
the advantages - nonetheless, most open source users still do not make
use of this possibility. Which is why it is mostly an illusion.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
ve you last
_had_ to fix anything yourself in a stable release of any open source
project?
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg ZH
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
find in an operating system (OpenBSD) that still ships today.
You probably don't have the access anywhere, but try looking at IBMs TPF
and you'll find stuff dating back to the early sixties. Surprisingly,
TPF has always been open source - for license hold
ail, you will either have to disable
> greylisting or to get a better set of customers.
Another option is to disable greylisting just for that one mailserver.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
> Salut, Per,
>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:47:48 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Another option is to disable greylisting just for that one
>> mailserver.
>
> This implies that either you know all servers hosting broken scripts
> (NP-complete I
We're having a problem delivering mails to a Cybernet hosted exchange
server.
thanks
Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Per Jessen wrote:
> We're having a problem delivering mails to a Cybernet hosted exchange
> server.
>
All sorted. Thanks.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/ma
rked fine.
dig @ns1.allytech.com. mail.rebel-management.com
also worked fine.
dig @ns2.allytech.com. mail.rebel-management.com
also worked fine.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg ZH
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
t
list is far more accurate. Maybe maxmind has gotten better since then.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
ending more than 4 lines of legalese at the end, you are expressly
permitting me to use your email and others coming from your domain as I
see fit; by posting you are accepting that your long legally sounding
signature is invalid.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
_
Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote:
> I hope you all understand, that having something to hide
> is *not* wrong, but something everybody does.
But when you're taking part in a relatively public and open debate or
forum, why would you find it necessary/appropriate to conceal your
identi
Nicolas Strina wrote:
> Ok the hw is quite important but
> well .. I see lots of CPE able to do the job even on DSL.
>
Nico, which manufacturers do you have in mind?
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (4.2°C)
___
swinog mailing li
e subnet you won't notice the difference.
You won't get any load-distribution either.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (2.1°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
im find
> some datacenter-type equipment that he can show off to the
> other students in his class. For example some rackmount
> device and a bit of optical fibre, if possible. There is no
> need for the stuff to be in working order.
No problem Norbert, give me a cal
to
> be blocked in a Firewall in the path.
When the client has issued a TCP query, any half-way decent firewall
will know not to block the reply.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Herrliberg (19.8°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.sw
Per Jessen wrote:
> Guy Baconniere wrote:
>
>> When the query reaches the DNS of the ISP it will reply with a DNS
>> TCP reply if minimal-responses is no (default on Bind9) or with a
>> small UDP DSN reply if minimal-responses is yes.
>
> I can't quite see
Steven Glogger wrote:
> if there's a discussion starting in german, and someone is asking for
> english it would be only polite to try to switch to english...
+1
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (23.7°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@list
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> Basically you need to redirect the requests for a single public IP
> address into several private IP addresses in your datacenter.
One acronym: LVS.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (13.4°C)
___
swinog mailing list
Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Though I really do
> not see why one would want to block the countries where great tech
> comes from. Just use an RBL, and solely use it for scoring
Really useful stuff such as rbldnsd does not yet support IPv6 for
listings.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Züri
aying "dress well to sign
> better contracts" ads.
"dress well to sign better contracts" - it's not bad advice.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (9.9°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
from that list, you'd be fine on openSUSE too. Still, nothing
wrong with untar+config+make :-)
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (0.6°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Peter Keel wrote:
> * on the Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:36:52PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
>> AFAICT from that list, you'd be fine on openSUSE too. Still, nothing
>> wrong with untar+config+make :-)
>
> Yes, very wrong. Maintainability goes trough the floor. Or are you
>
an, who has the resources to do this? not many I bet. So, as normal
> its a matter of compromise, you have to find the right balance. Ensure
> that your security policy is maintained within resource limits, due
> diligence et al. You have to do what works for you.
Exactly my thoughts.
/Per
by the quality of a modern
> Linux UI. At the back of my mind I still considered it as a server
> platform :)
Gee, Stanislav - KDE3 has been very solid for at least 3-4 years. I've
been using nothing else since 2005 or thereabouts.
/Per
-
e that, I don't know.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (13.9°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Since the beginning of March, we seem to have been having trouble
sending SMS'es via this service-number - judging from the phone-bill,
the connection IS established, but then times out after 64 seconds and
no message is sent. Has anyone else been having such problems?
--
Per Jessen, Z
Per Jessen wrote:
> Since the beginning of March, we seem to have been having trouble
> sending SMS'es via this service-number -
Just in case this might be interesting to others - we've been using this
SMSC for two-three years, generally with no problems. However, looking
at my
http://news.community36.net/redirect/?id=3598
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (21.4°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
egular landline SMSC 062210, which works very well.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (20.8°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
only send SMS if you're a swisscom customer, so they can
> charge the SMS on your invoice.
True.
> I belive glue.ch still offers TSP independent SMSSC Services if you
> regster at them.
Judging by http://www.swiss-sms-center.ch/, Swisscom
ktober 1987)
>
> So according to their own documents, they have no commercial interest
> (never laughed so hard).
In their defense, they have lowered the registration fees at least three
times in the last 8-9 years. That does show some "lack of
ey're not all that different.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (24.8°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
e other institution forced
> them to lower the fees?
>
> -steven
To be honest, I don't know - I remember reading that they were not
allowed to make a profit, and therefore had to adjust the fee in order
not to make to make profits based on the steadily
IP
> address] follows actually any requirement by a RFC? If so, which one?
I feel pretty certain it is not according to any RFC.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (15.0°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
:-)
Anyway, the default postfix reject for the above is a 450 and always 450
if the failure was caused by a lookup problem.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (11.0°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Fernmeldedienstanbieterin") *because* one is offering some sort of
> public Internet services.
AFAIK, the BAKOM obligation applies if you are providing internet
_access_ services. "public Internet services" is a much wider
definition.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (6.7°C)
__
> What Swisscom gateway phone number do you use?
I'm using landline SMS'ing now, but otherwise I think it was
079 499 9000 at 30Rp/SMS.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (0.9°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog
Per Jessen wrote:
> but otherwise I think it was
> 079 499 9000 at 30Rp/SMS.
Sorry, the number Mike Kellenberger posted is the correct one.
sms_client also uses ucp.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (1.2°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swi
ht not need it, but by adding a digit to the
originating number, we made the mobile phones make different beeps
depending on the type of alert.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (1.1°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Andreas Fink wrote:
> one year is already in law for telecommunication (voice calls, SMS
> etc). My daily headake to keep logs of 3 billion messages
lzma compression plus 3Tb harddrives :-)
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (6.3°C)
___
swinog m
pe from kd85.com.
Very nice - doesn't look like they do a VDSL version too?
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (0.0°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
ing there on a
daily basis, a lot more dust will be generated. If they're like ours,
where one person might go in for 20mins once a week, there is really
very little dust to clean.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (8.6°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lis
1980s, we used
_large_ electromagnets.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (2.7°C)
___
swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch
To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch
101 - 149 von 149 matches
Mail list logo
