: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Experiences with Foundry Bigiron-gear
Gunther Stammwitz asks a very reasonable question:
At the moment we're using Cisco 12000 gear in our network and now
I'd like to buy another
But here he makes a big mistake:
router
What about replacing
On Thu, 2 December 2004 10:45:02 +0100, Simon Leinen wrote:
[..]
How resistant the boxes are to various kinds of DoS I don't know - it
certainly looks hard to overwhelm the forwarding plane just by sending
small packets at it, because the total box capacity is 320 Mpps, which
seems to mean 40
Gunther Stammwitz asks a very reasonable question:
At the moment we're using Cisco 12000 gear in our network and now
I'd like to buy another
But here he makes a big mistake:
router
What about replacing this with the word box? :-)
in order to increase our redundancy. Another provided
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 10:45 +0100, Simon Leinen wrote:
Gunther Stammwitz asks a very reasonable question:
At the moment we're using Cisco 12000 gear in our network and now
I'd like to buy another
But here he makes a big mistake:
router
What about replacing this with the word box?
Title: RE: [swinog] Experiences with Foundry Bigiron-gear
If you want Routing get a Juniper.
But only if you don't need else anything besides that...
MPLS is a big hassle athough it works somehow, QoS is quite unusable on Junipers...
So yes, just plain routing with no features
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 11:09 +0100, Kuster, Christian wrote:
If you want Routing get a Juniper.
But only if you don't need else anything besides that...
MPLS is a big hassle athough it works somehow, QoS is quite unusable
on Junipers...
So yes, just plain routing with no features, then
Jeroen Massar adds to the unfounded router/switch FUD:
If you are desperatly still wanting anything from Foundry then
indeed go for a NetIron, this is what AMS-IX uses. But do note, they
don't do routing.
What do you mean they don't do routing? I already conceded that Real
Men don't call them
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 13:11 +0100, Simon Leinen wrote:
Jeroen Massar adds to the unfounded router/switch FUD:
If you are desperatly still wanting anything from Foundry then
indeed go for a NetIron, this is what AMS-IX uses. But do note, they
don't do routing.
What do you mean they don't
Hello colleagues,
At the moment we're using Cisco 12000 gear in our network and now I'd like
to buy another router in order to increase our redundancy. Another provided
pointed at his foundry bigiron 8000 and told me how well it is running.
Okay.. What he didn't know where the technical facts
BigIron is a Switch - not a router...
O.k. - maybe Foundry says, it's a router. But when you try to do some advanced
routing on that box - forget it...
That's my experience with those things - you might hear other...
Cheers,
Viktor
On Mittwoch 01 Dezember 2004 12.05, Gunther Stammwitz wrote:
It's a switch not a router IMO. If you want a router
talk to Juniper.
Neil.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gunther Stammwitz
Sent: 01 December 2004 11:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [swinog] Experiences with Foundry Bigiron
11 matches
Mail list logo
