[swinog] [Fwd: [SIUG-discuss] FMG-Revision in der Herbstsession]

2004-09-13 Thread Fredy Kuenzler
Good morning, Fwd from the SIUG discussion list. New important law will be discussed in the parlament soon. German: http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/ff/2003/index0_49.html Francais: http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/ff/2003/index0_49.html Italiano: http://www.admin.ch/ch/i/ff/2003/index0_49.html From our

RE: [swinog] [Fwd: [SIUG-discuss] FMG-Revision in der Herbstsession]

2004-09-13 Thread Steven Glogger
well, ok, lets have a demonstration sesson on the 29th :-) i'm sure we will get around 100 ppl to demonstrate ,-) everybody not demonstrating will not have the right to participate the social event ,-) -steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf

Re: [swinog] [Fwd: [SIUG-discuss] FMG-Revision in der Herbstsession]

2004-09-13 Thread Nik Hug
well, ok, lets have a demonstration sesson on the 29th :-) i'm sure we will get around 100 ppl to demonstrate ,-) everybody not demonstrating will not have the right to participate the social event ,-) why not change the medium of the new famous Bundesplatz-Jumping Well? Instead of ordinary

Re: [swinog] [Fwd: [SIUG-discuss] FMG-Revision in der Herbstsession]

2004-09-13 Thread John Morgan Salomon
Nik Hug wrote: why not change the medium of the new famous Bundesplatz-Jumping Well? Instead of ordinary water 26 different sorts of beer ... (SH= Falkenbier, VD=Boxer, BE=Egger, AG=Müllerbräu ... BS=Ueli Reverenz, and ZH=Corona with a little lemon bit in the top. Am I correct in reading this law

[swinog] WAN link provider

2004-09-13 Thread Philippe Strauss
Hello, I'm looking for a min. 40Mbps link between lausanne and geneve, the simpler technology the better (WDM, SDH OK - MPLS, ATM KO), I've asked offers to: SIG FibreLac Swisscom fixnet Sunrise wholesale cablecom wholesale colt (I doubt they deliver anything on Lsne) Did I forget someone?

Re: [swinog] WAN link provider

2004-09-13 Thread Marcel Prisi
Hello !! Tu tombes bien ... j'avais besoin moi aussi de qqch de similaire ( juste 10Mbps) ... J'ai principalement discuté avec Colt qui semblaient partant, ils m'ont demandé si on acceptait de houser du matos à eux chez nous au WTC ... ça t'irait le WTC comme POP ? Tu m'autorises à te citer en

Re: [swinog] WAN link provider

2004-09-13 Thread Pascal Gloor
Tu m'autorises à te citer en client potentiel Lausannois pour la suite des négociations avec eux ? hmmm, j crois que toute la suisse est deja au courant maintenant :-P Pascal ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [swinog] As seen on TISCALI.COM

2004-09-13 Thread Nicolas Strina
Hello, See: http://www.boursier.com/vals/FR/news.asp?id=108688 Sorry guys it's in French. Cu, Nico WHAT'S HOT Disposal of Tiscali Switzerland Tiscali announces to have entered into a binding agreement for the disposal of its Swiss subsidiary, Tiscali AG, to the Swiss ISP Smart Telecom SA. Chris

Re: [swinog] As seen on TISCALI.COM

2004-09-13 Thread Christian Jouas
Hey Nico look at your webpage . french. d'un montant de 8 Millions de Francs Suisses en cash --- ? .. Cash ? Please tell me where I can find the attach case with the shackles ? lol Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13.09.2004 16:33:52 Hello, See:

Re: [swinog] As seen on TISCALI.COM

2004-09-13 Thread Nicolas Strina
I will show you that tonight ! ;-) Btw Jérôme should answer that ! Cu, Nico Hey Nico look at your webpage . french. d'un montant de 8 Millions de Francs Suisses en cash --- ? .. Cash ? Please tell me where I can find the attach case with the shackles ? lol Chris

Re: [swinog] tiscali.ch

2004-09-13 Thread Fredy Kuenzler
Pascal Gloor wrote: Thanks to give us the prices :P while talking about price... 8 mio CHF Tiscali.ch - smart-telecom.ch aka VTX aka Gemischtwarenladen SCNR F. ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [swinog] tiscali.ch

2004-09-13 Thread Frederic Gargula
8M CHF for that what a good deal :-) Congrats to Francis !! Pascal Gloor wrote: Thanks to give us the prices :P while talking about price... 8 mio CHF Tiscali.ch - smart-telecom.ch aka VTX ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]

2004-09-13 Thread Simon Leinen
Marcel Prisi writes: Whoops ... reply-to was not the Good Thing (tm) ... Sorry all :-) So can we finally get rid of the Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] please? It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should be able to rely on people being able to use their mailer's reply to

[swinog] Beer Event in the Silicon Valley

2004-09-13 Thread Raffael Marty
Dear Swinogers living in the Silicon Valley, We are getting together for beers tomorrow evening: Date: Tuesday, Sept. 14th Time: 7.30pm Place: Molly MaGees, Mountain View (at Castro and Dana) See ya there Raffy -- Raffael Marty, CISSP [EMAIL

Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]

2004-09-13 Thread Arnold Nipper
On 13.09.2004 21:59 Simon Leinen wrote: So can we finally get rid of the Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] please? It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should be able to rely on people being able to use their mailer's reply to all feature when they want to write

Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]

2004-09-13 Thread Daniel Lorch
Hi It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should be able to rely on people being able to use their mailer's reply to all feature when they want to write followups. 1000% ACK ... Don't patronise us! -1 (I'm lazy, I like it this way) Daniel

Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]

2004-09-13 Thread Martin Ebnoether
On the Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:18:19PM +0100, Filip Mitev blubbered: Hi. Im new on this list, and i ask myself, why they dont install a forum, where users could list their problem or questions, etc Nah. Webforums suck. We'd rather have a Newsgroup or something then. CU, Venty -- Es

Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]

2004-09-13 Thread Arnold Nipper
On 13.09.2004 23:24 Fredy Kuenzler wrote: We have the reply-to list since ages. About twice a year a meil goes wrong, and the embarrassment for the sender is punishment enough. I'd prefer it to leave it as it is, because reply-to-sender causes interruptions of the discussion. 1. We do this

Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]

2004-09-13 Thread Karim Saouli
Maybe because this list is not for lusers, but at least for semi qualified half gods? Or would that be bragging too much about ourselves? Simply because for geeks like the many of us, e-mail is the easiest, simplest and most portable format. Cheers, K. - Original Message - From: Martin

Re: [swinog] [Fwd: [SIUG-discuss] FMG-Revision in der Herbstsession]

2004-09-13 Thread Felix Rauch
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, John Morgan Salomon wrote: [...] And I'm not 100% sure of the implications of article 13 and part 7 (privacy-related bits and bobs.) Will this imply that we get to sue '1337 h4x0rz? I'm also not sure why the commission and the Bundesamt need personal profiles. SIUG was