[sympy] GSoC'19 : Continuum mechanics Idea proposal

Hey Ishan, The ideas seems interesting and will be a good addition in the physics module. Let's wait what Jason and Jashan think about them. Till then keep contributing. Cheers!! Yathartha Joshi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy&q

[sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] Solvers

Yeah, you can but if you wish to use the code written by someone else, then you should cherry-pick the commits and then continue your work. In this way the authorship is maintained. Cheers! Yathartha Joshi On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 4:29:47 PM UTC+5:30, Kunal Sharma wrote: >

Re: [sympy] Fwd: [NumFOCUS Projects] Call for Proposals - Small Development Grants - Summer 2018

towards its next release. Regards Yathartha Joshi On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 4:02:07 PM UTC+5:30, Shekhar Prasad Rajak wrote: > > Hello Aaron, > > Thanks for clarifying. My most of the work is around Solvers module (but I > am ready for any new things as well). > I see that g

[sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] Solvers

might be slow to respond please bear with me :) Cheers and Keep Contributing! Yathartha Joshi On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 1:29:47 AM UTC+5:30, Kunal Sharma wrote: > > Hello everyone > My name is Kunal Sharma and I am willing to work on replacing solve with > solveset. As

[sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] Solvers

hem one by one. Also, feel free to ask any of your doubts here. I will try to reply you as soon as I can. Cheers! Yathartha Joshi On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 2:50:39 PM UTC+5:30, Jogi Miglani wrote: > > Hello, > > As we know that the work for solvers i.e replacing solve with solveset is &

[sympy] SymPy has been accepted as a GSoC mentoring org

Congratulations!! to the whole team. Cheers! Yathartha -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

[sympy] Re: Guidance on implementing the non-linear multivariate system in the solveset

- Handling modular equations (#13178 <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/13178>) - Support for transcendental equations in complex domain; will be nice additions in `transolve` . I would also recommend you to go through `solve` module to get more idea of how things work.

[sympy] Re: switching from solve to solveset

Hey Jon, I assume you want to do something like this: >>> eq = x**2 - y >>> solve(eq.subs({y:1})) [-1, 1] You can achieve this with `solveset` too: >>> solveset(eq.subs({y:1})) {-1, 1} Primarily `solve` and `solveset` differs in the way they return output, the former uses `list` while the

[sympy] Re: Guide me on this project: Solvers

I have update ideas page here <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2019-Ideas#gsoc-2018-project-yathartha-joshi> on solvers progress and todos. Yathartha On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 3:27:42 AM UTC+5:30, shiv3...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hey mentors, >

[sympy] Re: Guide me on this project: Solvers

I have updated the ideas page here <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2019-Ideas#gsoc-2018-project-yathartha-joshi> on solvers progress and the todo's On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 3:27:42 AM UTC+5:30, Shiv wrote: > > Hey mentors, >I am interested in this pr

Re: [sympy] Problem in determining logarithmic singularities

als > only" function because it somehow goes through the complex plane. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Yathartha Joshi > wrote: > > Consider the following logarithmic equation: > > > > log(3*x) - log(1 - x) - log(4*x + 1) > &g

[sympy] Problem in determining logarithmic singularities

Consider the following logarithmic equation: log(3*x) - log(1 - x) - log(4*x + 1) Wolfram alpha gives the result as `-1/2` and `1/2`, but mentions `-1/2` is only valid when considering complex valued

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

at 7:14:54 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Yathartha Joshi <yatha...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > I am not sure of IndexSet usage but the reason I thought of it was that > > whenever we need to represent arbitrary set we have

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

instance, n in Interval(2*n, 2*n + 1)) > > And you still haven't answered where infinite unions are needed for > solveset. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:14 AM, Yathartha Joshi <yatha...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > What I understood abou

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

t; > Regarding BigUnion, what is the point of having it and IndexSet that > can only represent a finite number of sets? Union can already do this > without the indirection. I'm also unclear where this will be needed > for solveset. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Thu, Mar 2

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

on > https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com and linking the draft proposal > there. That will make it easier to find in the future. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Yathartha Joshi <yatha...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > I have created a proposal here. It would be gre

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

I have created a proposal here <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kcZCdQuY3XxgHPuSA8vvwc6O8AbVZ-nYskMuXIia9hA/edit>. It would be great if you could review it and suggest any changes. Thanks in advance. Yathartha On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 11:08:27 PM UTC+5:30, Yathartha Joshi

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 2:26:18 PM UTC+5:30, Amit Kumar wrote: > > Hey Yathartha, > > That sounds good. > > Cheers! > Amit > Okay! Thanks. Also, I was thinking was making absolute value expressions to work in complex domain. I found a few equations that have complex solutions: -

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

n transolve, but I guess `_solve_trig` should handle it On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:28:33 AM UTC+5:30, Amit Kumar wrote: > > I will have a look at that PR. > > On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 4:54:57 AM UTC, Yathartha Joshi wrote: >> >> I have started a wiki page [her

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

verything you plan to implement. > > Feel free to ask any questions you have. > > Cheers, > Amit > > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 6:57:30 PM UTC, Yathartha Joshi wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, I am Yathartha Joshi a final year B.Tech CSE undergrad. I >> am willi

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

free to ask any questions you have. > > Cheers, > Amit > > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 6:57:30 PM UTC, Yathartha Joshi wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, I am Yathartha Joshi a final year B.Tech CSE undergrad. I >> am willing to be a part of GSoC 2018 for the

[sympy] GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

Hello everyone, I am Yathartha Joshi a final year B.Tech CSE undergrad. I am willing to be a part of GSoC 2018 for the project *Solvers: Completing Solveset*. Solveset has been under constant development from 2014, and then 2015, and 2016 and a lot of implementation have been done so far

[sympy] Re: GSoC

Congratulations! On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 12:40:32 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > SymPy has been accepted into GSoC again. > > All students interested in applying, please start here > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2018-Student-Instructions. > The application period

[sympy] Require ideas and suggestions for implementing exponential equation solver in solveset.

I am thinking to implement transcendental equation solve(transolve) in solveset as for GSoC 17. This discussion will be focusing on how to implement exponential equation solver as part of transolve. I require anyone who could provide me with the idea that would be efficient to solve

[sympy] Implementing transcendental equation solver for solveset #GSoC Project

I wish to work on implementing Equations solvable by LambertW (Transcendental equation solver) isssue#10006 in the solveset module. This would be one of my major GSoC project. I am looking over the idea about how solve implements this. It uses _tsolve for handling transcendental equations. I

[sympy] Problem in determining the idea behind the code in solveset.

Can anyone tell the idea how solveset solves equations, so that it will be easier to understand the code. I m unable to get the idea how the code is implemented. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sympy] Re: Problem with PR#12130

When will it be fixed..? On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 10:13:07 PM UTC+5:30, Kalevi Suominen wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 6:04:54 PM UTC+2, Yathartha Joshi wrote: >> >> Can anyone help me with [PR#12130]( >> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/121

[sympy] Problem with PR#12130

Can anyone help me with [PR#12130](https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/12130). I don't know where I went wrong. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sympy] Re: Testing the changes

l okay, then you can post your solution (where you were going > wrong). > > > Gaurav Dhingra > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Yathartha Joshi <yatha...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Sorry for the two messages, I was a bit too early to post. >> Now

[sympy] Re: Testing the changes

Sorry for the two messages, I was a bit too early to post. Now I figured out where actually I was going wrong. The problem is solved. Thanks @gaurav. Yathartha On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 5:00:19 PM UTC+5:30, Yathartha Joshi wrote: > > Hey, I am new I need help regarding how do

[sympy] Re: Testing the changes

Also I tried the commands but it stated python command not found. > > Further I specified the path > > *Path=$PATH:/C:/Users/DELL/AppData/Local/Programs/Python/Python35/* It still did not worked..What may be the posiible reason? On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 5:00:19 PM UTC+5:3

Re: [sympy] Testing the changes

s. > > > > > Gaurav Dhingra > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Yathartha Joshi <yatha...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hey, I am new I need help regarding how do I test the changes that I made >> in the module. >> I have made certain changes but

[sympy] Re: New to SymPy!

Hey, You can read the Introduction to contribution in sympy wiki. Here's the link: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Introduction-to-contributing Further you can get familiar with the sympy's development workflow :

[sympy] Testing the changes

Hey, I am new I need help regarding how do I test the changes that I made in the module. I have made certain changes but I can't figure out how to check whether my changes work for all test cases... How do I check?? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sympy] winpdb as python debugger

Well, I m not able to figure out how to use Winpdb in windows. I tried to find out how to use it in the internet, but was not able to do that. Please someone guide me through it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from

[sympy] starting contributing with bug fix

I m new to sympy but m willing to contribute in sympy by starting with bug fixing. Can you tell how can I start the task?? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

[sympy] Bug Fix

Well, I m new to Sympy, and I want to be a part of GSoC 17. I want to start contributing by bug fixing. Can you guide me in this process -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,