On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Luke wrote:
> +1 for sympy.physics.mechanics
+1 to sympy.physics.mechanics
I can imagine having lots of modules in sympy.physics, directly, i.e.
not sympy.physics.something.somethingelse.dynamics, but directly in
sympy.physics.
Ondrej
--
You received this mess
+1 for sympy.physics.mechanics
~Luke
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Luke wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:26 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> What would the classical module contain? Won't "newtonian", "galilean" or
>>> j
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Luke wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:26 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> What would the classical module contain? Won't "newtonian", "galilean" or
>> just "mechanics" be more suitable in this case?
>
> physics.classical will contain what Gilbert is wo
> sympy.physics.mechanics?
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:26 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
> What would the classical module contain? Won't "newtonian", "galilean" or
> just "mechanics" be more suitable in this case?
physics.classical will contain what Gilbert is working on for his GSoC
project. His project is focused
What would the classical module contain? Won't "newtonian", "galilean" or
just "mechanics" be more suitable in this case?
For example Hamiltonian mechanics applies to boot classical and quantum
physics. Also optics/thermodynamics/stat. phys./etc don't play well with
such separation.
Anyway, this
>> 1) Should any of the code in sympy.physics be bundled into it's own
>> submodule (similar to quantum and/or classical)?
>
> You could have either a 'physics' submodule and a 'classical'
> subsubmodule, or a 'classical physics' and a 'quantum physics'
> submodule. I don't really care either way,
On 7 Jun., 09:10, Luke wrote:
> Before doing this, I wanted to see what people thought about the
> organization of this module, because this will influence how the docs
> are organized. Currently, there are several files in sympy/physics,
> and then there is physics/quantum, and there is physics/
