>> 1) Should any of the code in sympy.physics be bundled into it's own >> submodule (similar to quantum and/or classical)? > > You could have either a 'physics' submodule and a 'classical' > subsubmodule, or a 'classical physics' and a 'quantum physics' > submodule. I don't really care either way, and this should be easy to > change later. The first one corresponds more to the (intended) > structure of the physics-related code.
I think having a physics submodule with 'classical' and 'quantum' subsubmodules make sense. I'll leave the other physics subsubmodules (units, matrices, hydrogen, etc.) where they are for now and if it makes sense to rearrange things, we can do that down the road. > >> 2) Are there reasons this part of sympy has not been added to >> docs.sympy.org in the past (other than lack of time)? > > No, it should be there, it is just that noone yet made sure it's > generated correctly when building the docs. > I'll get started on this. ~Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
