Good to know!
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:20 PM Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Regarding galgebra, at first it did languish quite a bit, but now it
> has been picked up by several people and is doing well
> https://github.com/pygae/galgebra. So I think the main
Regarding galgebra, at first it did languish quite a bit, but now it
has been picked up by several people and is doing well
https://github.com/pygae/galgebra. So I think the main issue is that
for a package to do well on its own, it needs to have a strong
community, which is independent of the
Sounds good, I will add it to sympy.physics.
Thanks all for your suggestions.
On Thu, May 7, 2020, 00:48 Jason Moore wrote:
> Gagandeep,
>
> Thanks for the consideration of my comments.
>
> Jason
> moorepants.info
> +01 530-601-9791
>
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:13 PM Gagandeep Singh
Gagandeep,
Thanks for the consideration of my comments.
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:13 PM Gagandeep Singh (B17CS021) <
singh...@iitj.ac.in> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for presenting points on why sub-packages should be kept in the
> main sympy repo.
Hi Jason,
Thanks for presenting points on why sub-packages should be kept in the main
sympy repo. What I suggested was just an immature approach. Obviously,
there will be trade-offs in too much granulation of the codebase. I didn't
mean that what I suggested must be done.
> It allows the code to
Gangandeep,
I disagree with your thoughts on this. We've dealt with this over a decade
ago with the symbolic pydy package (which started as a separate package).
After careful consideration we decided to add this to SymPy and it was the
right decision. It allows the code to be tested along with
Naman,
I think we should add it to SymPy in the physics package.
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 8:43 AM Naman Nimmo wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Since the accepted GSoC projects are out now, and my project - "Control
> Theory - Implement a control systems package"
Hi,
IMHO, the control systems should go as a separate repository under sympy
with the main sympy repository as a dependency.
In fact that should have happened with sympy.stats as well, as no other
module uses features of stats and the case is other way around but that is
a thing for another day.
