he output of lambdify is a numpy.ndarray of the same shape
>>> as the sm.Matrix.
>>> With cse=True, the output is is list.
>>> (I guess, this is what you said, would happen.)
>>>
>>> Does this mean, if I somehow manage to convert the lists into ndarrays of
Thanks for the bug report Souvik.
Can you please open an issue on GitHub rather than post here? Also can
you extract the code from the notebook and just post a minimal block
of code that reproduces the problem?
--
Oscar
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 21:50, SOUVIK CHAKRABORTY
wrote:
>
> Kindly look
time for this release.
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release!
- Saksham Alok*
- anutosh491
- Alexander Behrens*
- Oscar Benjamin
- Varenyam Bhardwaj*
- Anurag Bhat
- Akshansh Bhatt
- Francesco Bonazzi
- Islem BOUZENIA*
- Arie Bovenberg*
- Riley Britten*
- Zaz Brown*
- cocolato*
- Björn
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 15:36, Peter Stahlecker
wrote:
>
> Dear Oscar,
>
> Thanks for your hint about these parameters!.
> Probably dumb question of mine:
> Could one not define f_Vi_est directly as
>
> def_Vi_est(gamma, alfa, beta, eta, L, K, VA):
>Vi_est = gamma - (1 / eta)…..
>
Hi all,
I've just put out a bugfix release SymPy 1.11.1.
There is only one change since 1.11 was released a week ago which is
to fix a bug with using lambdify with the cse=True flag (as discussed
here on the mailing list). Thanks to Jason Moore and Chris Smith for
getting a quick fix together.
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 08:55, Peter Stahlecker
wrote:
>
> I have upgraded to sympy 1.11
> I wanted to try the cse keyword.
>
> If I set cse = False, all seems to work fine.
> If I set cse = True, lambdify(..) seems to work fine, but solve_ivp(..) gives
> and error.
It looks like cse=True
On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 12:09, Juan Francisco Puentes Calvo
wrote:
>
> Something as simple as below:
>
> import sympy as sp;
> U1, red, green = sp.symbols("U1, red, green");
> sp.ask(sp.Ne(U1,red), assumptions=sp.Eq(U1,green));
>
> Returns None, but.
>
> sp.ask(sp.Eq(U1,green),
On Sat, 24 Sept 2022 at 09:24, Peter Stahlecker
wrote:
>
> Thanks! I did not know about nsolve.
> Would nsolve be ‚better‘ than converting the equations to numpy, using
> lambdify, and the use scipy.optimize.fsolve ?
When you use nsolve more or less the same thing happens: the equations
are
You should be able to obtain a parametric Groebner basis to represent
the solutions of this system. Whether that leads to an explicit
solution in radicals is hard to say without trying.
I would demonstrate how to do this but the code for putting together
the equations is incomplete.
On Fri, 5
That code still doesn't work: it gives SyntaxError. Please test the
code yourself in a fresh Python process before sending it.
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 15:51, Kevin Pauba wrote:
>
> As you suspected, Jeremy, the simplify=False didn't have any visible affect.
>
> BTW, earlier, I should have posted
I just had a quick look and I think that maybe this has a positive
dimensional solution set.
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 16:08, Kevin Pauba wrote:
>
> Here's the minimal working example (except for it hanging on solve()):
>
> import sympy as sym
> from sympy import sqrt
>
> q1, q2, s, s1, s2, q_dp1,
The equations you are attempting to solve lead to a very complicated
Groebner basis that is slow to compute (I'm not sure how long it
takes) and probably gives quite a complicated expression for the
solution.
It might be better if you can derive the equations without introducing
radicals i.e. to
The question is just if you can derive equations without radicals that
are simpler than those generated by unrad. The ones generated by unrad
are already too complicated because you have a pair of multivariate
quartics. Only if you are lucky could that lead to any explicit
analytic solution in
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 08:37, wrote:
>
> If the numbers are represented as prime factors to begin with, finding the
> gcd is easier. Then, calculating the sum requires multiplying out the
> numerators, which should be easier than factoring the decimal representation.
> But that's just my
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 11:15, David Bailey wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2022 23:56, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> > I forgot to mention that to install this release you can use:
> >
> > pip install --pre sympy
> >
> > --
> > Oscar
> >
> Oscar,
>
> Whe
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:26, wrote:
>
> In order to install gmpy2 I ran pip install and added an import statement. Do
> I need anything else?
If gmpy2 is installed then it will be used automatically by the polys
module for internal calculations. It is not used by Rational so
whether it gets
to everyone who contributed to this release!
- Saksham Alok*
- anutosh491
- Alexander Behrens*
- Oscar Benjamin
- Varenyam Bhardwaj*
- Anurag Bhat
- Akshansh Bhatt
- Francesco Bonazzi
- Islem BOUZENIA*
- Arie Bovenberg*
- Riley Britten*
- Zaz Brown*
- cocolato*
- Björn Dahlgren
- Nikhil Date
I forgot to mention that to install this release you can use:
pip install --pre sympy
--
Oscar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 14:38, Zohreh Karimzadeh wrote:
>
> Dear sympy group
> Thanks for your sympy.
>
> I am working on a code, after creating my big expression using sympy it
> includes sqrt.
>
> I need to lambdify my expression to make it consistent with numpy and other
> suffs.
>
> expr =10
serious, just what semi retired engineers do. :-))
>
> Thanks, Peter
>
> On Sat 13. Aug 2022 at 02:09, David Bailey wrote:
>>
>> On 12/08/2022 11:37, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 11:15, David Bailey wrote:
>> >> On 09/08/2022 23:56,
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 04:52, S.Y. Lee wrote:
>
> Hashcons looks interesting, but as simple as making every object as singletons
> I would have a question how this would be implemented effectively on top of
> python, for example, how to keep the hash table not grow infinitely with dead
>
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 07:27, Kevin Moore wrote:
>
> Hello! I'm trying to get my head wrapped around how to use SolveSet (and
> whether I should be using solve or some other method instead), and I ran into
> the following problem.
The question is why you are trying to compare these sets. I
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 04:56, Carl K wrote:
>
> I'm playing with physics problems. Can SymPy solve problem like this?
>
> Question: a**2+b**2+c**2==1 (real valued)
> Answer: -1<=a<=1,
> -sqrt(1-a**2)<=b<=sqrt(1-a**2),
> c is +- sqrt(1-a**2-b**2)
What you are
This question was also asked and answered in other places:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/discussions/24483
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75057460/convert-string-of-a-named-expression-in-sympy-to-the-expression-itself
The OP wants eval:
In [1]: expr1 = x*y + 1
In [2]: expr1
Out[2]: x⋅y +
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 01:12, gu...@uwosh.edu wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 6:33:38 AM UTC-6 syle...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I think that simplify or evaluation should rather be decomposed in many
>> components
>
>
> To a great extent I think sympy already does this through the
Hi Simon,
Yes, I think that SymPy 1.11 was released shortly before CPython 3.11.
It was tested against 3.11 through all the beta versions etc.
I don't immediately have 3.11 to hand. Does pip still install SymPy
from PyPI under 3.11?
Oscar
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 14:39, Simon Cross wrote:
>
>
SymPy's save function is just using matplotlib so the question is not
really about SymPy but about matplotlib:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5453375/matplotlib-svg-as-string-and-not-a-file
Oscar
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 10:57, Anton Makarov wrote:
>
> Hi, i need to save figure from svg
The ordinary Python round function can do this:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#round
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 09:46, Peter Stahlecker
wrote:
> you might want to check floating point numbers in the sympy documentation.
>
> Am Do., 17. Nov. 2022 um 10:18 Uhr schrieb 'XR-7 RKE'
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 14:01, Anton Makarov wrote:
>
> I need to convert sympy tree expression to svg, for instance:
> a = sympify("1+2/3")
> b = sympify("x+5/x+3*sin(x)")
> c = a + b
> and i need to convert c expression to svg string
Your question is very ambiguous. Since SVG is an image format
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 14:17, Anton Makarov wrote:
>
> Yes i need typeset equation in a webpage. I know about mathjax, i understand
> that there is a possibility to convert sympy tree expression to latex and
> then handle it on client web page and convert to svg with mathjax.
> But is there any
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 at 07:39, Allan Anilson wrote:
>
> I am Allan Anilson, 19.
> I have been using python for around 2 months now. I'm currently pursuing my
> undergraduate studies in Computer Science and engineering. I am new to sympy
> and open source, I want to start contributing to the
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 07:13, Teo wrote:
>
> Hi all. I just started using Sympy this week. According to this video, when
> the following code was run, the units of ohm would be returned in SI base
> units.
>
> import sympy.physics.units as u
> u.ohm
>
> However, when I tried, I got the symbol
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 10:11, Vaani Pathariya wrote:
>
> Hello everyone !
> I started working with sympy a few months back and I really love the work the
> organisation is doing .My indent is towards Physics related topics and have
> even contributed to solve things related to physics units .I
I don't know how you get the handle to the matplotlib figure but there
should be some way to do it.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 14:01, Антон Макаров wrote:
>
> Thank you for answer. As far as I can understand the p1 variable in my sample
> code is the object of mathplotlib library, right?
>
>
>
>
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 16:51, Iman wrote:
>
> I encountered a issue with the output of the following script:
>
> from sympy.physics.quantum import *
> represent(Y(0)*Y(0),nqubits=1)
>
> I am expecting the ouput being a 2 by 2 identity matrix. But instead,
> the output is a single number 1.
>
> I
This is perhaps related to this issue:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/24153
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 17:03, Iman wrote:
>
> It runs on my PC.
> I imported additional modules:
> from sympy.physics.quantum import *
> from sympy.physics.quantum.qubit import *
> from sympy.physics.quantum.gate
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 16:05, brombo wrote:
>
> I have a sum of terms some of which are multiplied by cos(th). I want to
> group these terms together (in parenthesis) and have the terms not multiplied
> by cos(th). A complicating issue is that the sum is a numerator in a
> fraction.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 at 12:26, Jason Moore wrote:
>
> 1 year seems too short from my perspective. As a downstream package
> maintainer, I release many packages less often than SymPy makes releases and
> keeping up with deprecations disappearing effectively each SymPy release
> would be
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 10:39, 'Tom van Woudenberg' via sympy
wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to symbolically evaluate an integral with SymPy:
>
> import sympy as sp
> q, L, H = sp.symbols('q L H',positive=True,real=True)
> x = sp.symbols('x',real=True)
> Lexact =
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 11:31, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 10:39, 'Tom van Woudenberg' via sympy
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm trying to symbolically evaluate an integral with SymPy:
>
> Which version of sympy are you using?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 08:33, 'Tom van Woudenberg' via sympy
wrote:
>
> Disabling integration would be a neat solution! However, as Aaron stated,
> dsolve() hangs when using all_Integral.
That's a separate issue that should also be fixed.
> What would be the best way to proceed? Would a flag
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 06:14, Chris Smith wrote:
>
> Just read about https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03456 in Quanta artical
> https://www.quantamagazine.org/finally-a-fast-algorithm-for-shortest-paths-on-negative-graphs-20230118/.
> One of the algorithms used in the solution computes a low-diameter
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 17:00, Mohit Kumar wrote:
>
> I want to contribute to sympy so, I ran tests using `$./setup.py test` . Now
> I want to know if there would have been any error , I mean what it would show?
It is better to run tests by running the bin/test script or using
pytest. The full
On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 at 20:00, jesse grabowski wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> I am (trying) to use Sympy to automatically derive first order conditions and
> a log-linear approximation to non-linear systems of equations from user
> provided problem descriptions. An example system might look
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 at 18:05, Siddharth k wrote:
>
> May someone tell me which issue can i work on for my first ? since I tried
> some of them by label (Easy to Fix) but can't seem to understand much or
> somehow just dropped on trying to solve.
Perhaps if you post a link to one that you
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 21:15, emanuel.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> There seems to be some funamental differences between Sympy's integration
> algorithm an other ones (say Sage, Maxima, Giac, Fricas or Mathematica).
> Sympy :
>
> ```
> >>> from sympy import *
> >>> x=symbols("x", positive=True)
>
I've opened an issue to track releasing SymPy 1.12:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/24601
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hi all,
I'm thinking about putting out a release of SymPy 1.12 soon.
Does anyone know of any issues that should be resolved before release?
The current release notes for 1.12 are here:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/release-notes-for-1.12
--
Oscar
--
You received this message because
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 20:28, David Bailey wrote:
>
> On 26/01/2023 12:56, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> > I've opened an issue to track releasing SymPy 1.12:
> > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/24601
> >
> I went ahead and installed what I thought would be sy
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 16:38, Thomas Ligon wrote:
>
> Should pickle work for Function and Derivative? I found Sympy issue #4297 and
> the answer seems to be no.
> Nevertheless, here is what I have:
> I have a private dictionary containing expressions of symbols, and everything
> works fine.
>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 14:57, 'Tom van Woudenberg' via sympy
wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to implement a meijerg=false option for dsolve as well?
It would be better to have a simple way of disabling integration in dsolve.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 at 16:12, Peter Stahlecker
wrote:
>
> Just to increase my understanding: why would one deprecate 'things' which
> work?
> Is this related to python's development?
Sometimes things sort of work in some cases but don't really work
properly and it isn't possible to fix them
On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 15:24, Paul Royik wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for the response.
> Is there any other ways without evaluate=False?
> What about def _parse_order(cls, order): function?
> Can I specify a custom order?
I don't think anything like this is possible but it would be good to
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 11:10, Paul Royik wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Is it possible to render cos ^2 (x)- sin ^2 (x) as "cos ^2 (x)- sin ^2 (x)",
> not "- sin ^2 (x)+cos^2(x)"? I want terms with negative sign be last.
>
> I've discovered that there is def _print_Add(self, expr, order=None):
>
> How
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:23, Phil Williams wrote:
Hi Phil,
> I use sympy for matrix calculations in my Finite Math class that I teach. I
> have students working in a Jupyter Notebook. What I want is a
> student-friendly interface for in-place row operations on matrices, so that
> they can
Ideally things like this would work but support for multivariate
systems of inequalities is practically nonexistent in refine right
now.
Oscar
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 19:10, Joseph Nasser wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to check whether an inequality with multiple variables is
> satisfied
The degree function can be imported like
from sympy import degree
It is used to get the degree of a polynomial expression.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 at 14:53, Thomas Ligon wrote:
>
> Thanks! That's a big help, but I am not finished yet. Here is where I am now:
>
> Step 1: Use your code.
> name
Hi Atahan,
I don't think that there has been any work on Groebner bases in SymPy
in the last year.
I just looked at the Groebner bases project idea. I guess you mean this one:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas#efficient-groebner-bases-and-their-applications
I would say that there
*
- anutosh491
- Ayush Aryan*
- Blair Azzopardi
- Stefan Behnle*
- Oscar Benjamin
- Evandro Bernardes*
- Anurag Bhat
- Francesco Bonazzi
- Sam Brockie*
- Pontus von Brömssen*
- Zach Carmichael
- Michele Ceccacci*
- cocolato
- Costor*
- Björn Dahlgren
- Nikhil Date
- Eric Demer*
- Devansh*
- Pieter
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 21:34, Atahan Haznedar wrote:
>
> Unfortunately I couldn't make any progress fixing an issue for the Sympy
> repository these couple days. This is the first time for me trying to make a
> contribution to an open source community. Is it normal that I get overwhelmed
> and
There already is mathics which is a Wolfram Language interpreter that
is based on SymPy. It would seem a bit odd to create a new one.
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 at 19:48, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> I believe the primary function of this project is to make it easier to
> integrate the RUBI integrator into
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 20:39, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 3:04 PM Atahan Haznedar
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Oscar,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply, after seeing the post you have made, I can pretty
> > much can say that I am really excited! There are lots of things on the
> >
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 11:33, Suchit K wrote:
>
> Why does Poly.integrate() function doesn't give correct answer for asymptotic
> expressions like O(x**2)?
> Example:
> from sympy import *
> x = Symbol('x')
> exp = Poly(O(x**4))
> print(exp.integrate()) #prints 1/2*O(x**4)**2 instead of O(x**5)
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 23:29, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 21:32, David Bailey wrote:
> >
> > Oscar,
> >
> > The release of SymPy 1.12 seemed to be very close, but nothing has
> > happened!
> >
> > It doesn't really matt
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 21:32, David Bailey wrote:
>
> Oscar,
>
> The release of SymPy 1.12 seemed to be very close, but nothing has
> happened!
>
> It doesn't really matter to me, but it would be interesting to explore
> whatever is new.
Hi David,
I should have sent an announcement to the
On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 at 08:32, Thomas Ligon wrote:
>
> I have a lot of power series that look like this (but going up to t**12):
> exp1 = -2867.70035529489*t**5 + 147.938724526848*t**3 - 2.56500070531002*t
> While trying to gain some insight into the mathematics that creates them, I
> want to
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 17:13, Tirthankar Mazumder
wrote:
>
> Adding a bit to this, the Rust repository does something similar to the
> pre-commit hook thing: When you set up your dev environment, you can
> optionally run ./x.py setup which optionally installs a pre-commit hook (with
> the
e commit, but it is
>> the author's choice to do so.
>>
>> Jason
>> moorepants.info
>> +01 530-601-9791
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 3:41 PM Oscar Benjamin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There are two
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 06:36, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:33 PM Jason Moore wrote:
> >
> > When the # of dependencies is large, dependabot is a very annoying feature.
> > I contributed to a Javascript lib and the dependabot floods your inbox and
> > notifications with
There is now SymPy Beta:
https://sympy-beta.vercel.app/
I'm not sure that we want to work on improving SymPy Gamma (rather
than improving SymPy Beta instead).
--
Oscar
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 19:53, Tilo RC wrote:
>
> Hi Aman. I am another GSoC applicant and I wanted to let you know that when I
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 08:33, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 10:29 AM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have figured out though a way that I could automate updates for
> > requirements.txt files using the create-pull-request action and
> &g
On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 02:19, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 5:04 AM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 06:36, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:33 PM Jason Moore wrote:
> > > >
>
Hi Abhishek,
This is a nice looking proposal. I think what is proposed to do is
over-ambitious though. I expect that it is not possible to make really
good implementations of all of the algorithms listed within the time
of a single GSOC project. In practice probably various other things
will need
Hi all,
There are two open PRs discussing the potential use of pre-commit and
pre-commit.ci in SymPy:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/24908
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/24941
I want to know what others think specifically about enabling
pre-commit.ci on the sympy repo or otherwise
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 09:02, Tilo RC wrote:
>
> Hello! My name is Tilo and I am a sophomore at Pomona College in Claremont,
> California. Currently, I am double majoring in math and cs. I am highly
> interested in participating in GSoC with sympy because I believe it would be
> a great
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 06:58, Mohitabinav Mohan Babu
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone, I am Mohit, a sophomore pursuing Btech in Indian Institute of
> Technology Madras. i am interested in working on the project "Optimize
> Floating Point Expressions" as a part of GSoC-2023. I looked in to the
>
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 at 23:06, David Bailey wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> If I want to enter m+1/2, I define m as a symbol and write:
>
> m+S(1)/2.
>
> However if I have a complicated expression with lots of fractions, such as:
>
> 1 + x*(m + 1/2)/(2*m + 1) + x**2*(m + 1/2)*(m + 3/2)/(2*(2*m +
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 00:16, David Bailey wrote:
>
> On 02/07/2023 23:44, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 at 23:06, David Bailey wrote:
> >> Dear Group,
> >>
> >> If I want to enter m+1/2, I define m as a symbol and write:
> >&g
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 05:23, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> But note that this is not a trivial thing to do, which is why it
> hasn't happened yet. It's not as simple as just renaming the branch.
> We also have to fix all the references to "master" everywhere,
> including making sure that all our
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 04:25, Sangyub Lee wrote:
>
> I think that github decided to do that in 2020.
> And the main reason to do this is that 'master' is agreed to be politically
> offensive terminology:
I've been wondering for a long time now when someone would bring this up.
Having watched
Hi Diane and welcome,
I'm looking forward to seeing hypothesis used with SymPy. It seems
like it could be really useful and I looked at it a few times but I
just couldn't quite get my head round what the workflow would be, like
exactly how we could use it...
If you can figure that out (and
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 06:51, Paul Royik wrote:
>
> How do I simplify the following expressions: i**(-2*i), (-i)**(-2*i),
> ((-sqrt(3) - i)/2)**(-2*i), ((sqrt(3) - i)/2)**(-2*i) ?
>
> Is there any built-in function?
>
> For example, i**(-2*i) should give e^pi and ((sqrt(3) - i)/2)**(-2*i) should
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 at 03:42, Melis Gezer wrote:
>
> Is there any function to obtain an explicit formula of coefficients for
> generating functions?
>
> It should give, for example, (1/(n+1))C(2n,n) if I gave the generating
> function of Catalan numbers.
I don't understand exactly what you are
for this release; 42 people contributed
for the first time for this release.
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release!
- Jyn Spring 琴春*
- anutosh491
- Ayush Aryan*
- Blair Azzopardi
- Stefan Behnle*
- Oscar Benjamin
- Evandro Bernardes*
- Anurag Bhat
- Francesco Bonazzi
- Sam Brockie*
- Pontus
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 19:46, David Bailey wrote:
>
> Many thanks Oscar for this release!
>
> Since it has been some time since 1.11 (or indeed 1.12rc1) was released,
> I guess there were some deep and messy problems to be resolved!
>
> It installed for me and runs my code.
>
> Should we expect a
Hi Aaron,
I think we should start by removing everything from the ideas page and
moving it to an "old ideas" page with a clear note indicating that
some might still be relevant but others are likely not. I don't think
it is good to leave things on there and just let them roll over from
one year
e triage permissions to
>> just about anyone so they can go through and label old issues (triage
>> permissions give you permissions to label issues). Just ask me or
>> Oscar.
>>
>> Aaron Meurer
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:25 PM Oscar Benjamin
>>
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 07:42, Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> I was going over the open issues i could potentially solve and I think some
> of them are still open after their solution PR has been merged. What do I do
> about those issues . Should I leave a comment on the issue on its closing or
>
We should just remove slotscheck from CI. It isn't useful enough to
justify any CI maintenance burden.
--
Oscar
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 13:20, Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> I have opened a PR which potentially fixes the issue , however the warnign
> about the deprecated modules remain kindly
Hi Shishir,
There is a guide for contributing to SymPy here:
https://docs.sympy.org/dev/contributing/index.html#contributing
The main thing is to find something that you can work on to improve
SymPy. The starting point for that is usually to look at the open
issues on GitHub, especially those
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 15:16, Spiros Maggioros wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
Hi Spiros,
> My name is Spiros Maggioros and i'm a 3rd year undegraduate electrical &
> computer engineering student at National Technical University of Athens.I've
> worked as a machine learning engineering intern at
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 15:54, Spiros Maggioros
wrote:
> So we showed that, using AVL trees instead of arrays is much better(note
> that even linked lists is slower cause the insertion time complexity is
> O(n)).
>
Interesting. Did you compare the AVL tree with other sparse data structures?
>
I think what you mean here is more like "variables" rather than
"symbols". You might want to try using Spyder which can show you the
values of all of the Python variables you have defined.
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 17:16, Mario Lemelin wrote:
>
> If I had one functionality to have in Sympy, it would
Hi all,
Yesterday I pushed a new release of python-flint version 0.6.0 to
PyPI. I expect that this release will appear in conda soon as well.
The new release can be installed with
pip install --upgrade python-flint
As in previous releases there are binary wheels available for CPython
Hi all,
It is past time that a new release of SymPy is needed. Let's get SymPy
1.13 out ASAP.
I had been meaning to put out a bugfix release of SymPy 1.12.1 because
of a few things that have been fixed since SymPy 1.12 but it didn't
happen. In particular compatibility with Python 12's ast module
It's hard to tell from a screenshot. Do you have a link to the PR?
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 17:36, Shishir Kushwaha
wrote:
>
> Do I need to add my details everytime to thee .mailmap file when making a PR
> , I did it in my first PR as mentioned in the documentation but when creating
> a new
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 22:36, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:28 PM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> >
> > Without making python-flint a hard dependency there is no way to
> > specify what versions should be acceptable in an install so I think
> &
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 21:52, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:41 AM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> >
> > I think that probably the right way to do this is just for SymPy to
> > use python-flint by default if it is installed but with an almost
> > exact
t confusing otherwise. I already submitted the application with the
> link to https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas, so whatever is
> on that page will be "the ideas page".
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 12:54 PM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
&g
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 23:32, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> A lot of the advanced ideas are important enough that if we found
> someone willing and actually able to do them, then we should make an
> effort to actually find someone who could mentor them. Particularly
> the ideas relating to the polys
601 - 700 of 710 matches
Mail list logo
