That's very sad to hear. I have vivid memories of interacting with him on
some pull requests,
quite a while ago. He was very patient and was delight to communicate. I
still remember, how
he helped me in this PR: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/9291 I learnt
a lot just by
communicating to
>
> My biggest concern with the new rules is the reduced stipend, which
> could have consequences of raising the barrier of who can apply.
>
Why do you think so? Reduced stipend comes with reduced work isn't it?
-
Amit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
upta*
> - Mohit Gupta*
> - Oscar Gustafsson
> - Johan Guzman*
> - Johannes Hartung*
> - Ashutosh Hathidara*
> - Jean-Luc Herren*
> - Thomas Hickman
> - Jerry James*
> - Shubham Kumar Jha
> - Milan Jolly*
> - Lucas Jones
> - Jonty16117*
> -
Hi,
SymPy Gamma [1] and Live [2] runs on Google App Engine's Python 2 Runtime.
We currently have the ability to login in both of these apps via Google App
Engine's User's API that comes bundled with Python 2 runtime. [3]
Now, since as you all know Python 2 is no longer supported, we need to
Hi Ashlesha,
Please have a look at this for contributing to SymPy:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Introduction-to-contributing
-
Amit
On Monday, November 11, 2019 at 9:43:48 AM UTC, Ashlesha Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am Ashlesha Kumar, undergraduate engineering student pursuing Computer
Cool, stuff!
-
Amit
https://iamit.int
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 3:29:32 AM UTC, Jason Moore wrote:
>
> How cool! I definitely ordering some stuff. What a great way to raise some
> money for open source and get us decked out.
>
> Jason
> moorepants.info
> +01 530-601-9791
>
>
> On Tue, Oct
t; >> > implemented).
>> >> >
>> >> > IndexSet will be implemented to get access to set of sets through
>> >> > indexing,
>> >> > a number of sets will be passed as parameters and an instance of
>> >> > IndexSet
Hey Yathartha,
That sounds good.
Cheers!
Amit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
Hi Ishan,
Thanks for your interest in working on solvers. To get started with it have
a look at the status of the project here:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2018-Ideas#solvers
There is a lot that needs to be done. One of the starting points can be
understanding
solveset and then
the wiki.
Cheers,
Amit
> Thanks!
>
> On Sunday, March 11, 2018 at 6:01:00 PM UTC+5:30, Amit Kumar wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yathartha,
>>
>> Thanks for your interest in working on solveset. I am glad to hear that.
>> The things you have mentioned are completely wo
Hi Yathartha,
Thanks for your interest in working on solveset. I am glad to hear that.
The things you have mentioned are completely worth well over a
summer. I would definitely focus a lot on transolve. It is the most
crucial part of solvers. To go about it take a look at the
_tsolve function in
What's the error message you're getting and where?
-
Amit
On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 5:32:30 AM UTC, aaris...@iiitd.ac.in wrote:
>
> I am unable to make a pull request for an issue to which already a pull
> request has been made by someone else.What could be the issue?Waiting for
> an early
It would be great to see the anonymised results.
-
Amit
On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 6:27:49 PM UTC, Jason Moore wrote:
>
> Do you plan to make the anonymous results public? Could we be shared on
> the form to see the results?
>
> moorepants.info
> +01 530-601-9791
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018
tarted asking
> for issues that whether they are open or not so that they could be assigned
> to me.
>
> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 4:25:14 PM UTC+5:30, Amit Kumar wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You can have a look at this wiki to get started:
>> https
Hi,
You can have a look at this wiki to get
started: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2018-Student-Instructions
Cheers,
Amit
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 5:36:27 AM UTC, aaris...@iiitd.ac.in wrote:
>
> I would love to contribute in Sympy. So I want to know about the main code
>
Hi,
Welcome to SymPy. Please have a look at the following link to start
contributing to SymPy:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Introduction-to-contributing
Amit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Hi arzoo,
Please have a look at this for contributing to SymPy:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Introduction-to-contributing
Amit
On Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 8:16:18 PM UTC, arzoo kumar wrote:
>
> Hello ! I am Arzoo Prajapati. I want to contribute in sympy organization
> so that the
On Friday, December 15, 2017 at 6:41:28 PM UTC, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Gina Helfrich wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > NumFOCUS, the nonprofit that provides fiscal sponsorship for SymPy,
> kicks
> > off our end of year fundraising drive officially on Monday
an be incorporated in this tutorial.
>
>
I would encourage you to propose an exclusive SymEngine talk as well, it
would be an
interesting material for a full-fledged talk. You can anyway join in for
workshop if it gets
accepted.
Regards,
Amit Kumar
> As a part of my project, I'll be maki
d other by Ondrej and Isuru in SciPy 2016.
Both the videos/content are available online.
>
> --
> Shekhar
>
>
> On Saturday, 8 July 2017 16:46:38 UTC+5:30, Amit Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Shekhar,
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 10:
Hi Shekhar,
On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 10:11:41 AM UTC+5:30, Shekhar Prasad Rajak
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> This post is regarding upcoming PyCon India in Delhi. I am interested to
> attend this event and for the talk or workshop on SymPy. Let me know if
> someone is available and
On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 1:48:04 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Once I have finished the SymPy release, I would like to make an update
> to how we do changelogs.
>
> Right now, changelog entries are made manually on the wiki, at
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Release-Notes.
*Dear friends,*
* I have good knowledge in c ,c++,python and work with visual studio
2013 . I want to know how can I take part in GSoC 17 and how to get in
contact with the mentor organizations .*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy"
Here is a brief blog post about my experience of fossasia conference:
http://iamit.in/blog/sympy-workshop-fossasia-2016/
Amit Kumar
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:02:00 AM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:51:17 AM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrot
ng
this.
Amit Kumar
>
> Jason
> moorepants.info
> +01 530-601-9791
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Jason Moore <moore...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I believe Sahil will be there to present something on PyDy.
>>
>>
>> Jason
>> moor
Yes, Sahil's talk on "Multibody Dynamics and Control with Python"
is in the same room, an hour before mine.
Amit Kumar
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:49:34 AM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrote:
>
> I believe Sahil will be there to present something on PyDy.
>
>
> Jason
&g
up with me. :)
Amit Kumar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send emai
t's
very
important to write a more modular and extensible transcendental equation
solver. _tsolve also uses bivariate.py for most of the processing, though
you can note that there aren't many direct calls to solve() in the
bivariate.py
except one or two, So it would be great if we could directly use (c
, then please let me know. :)
AMiT Kumar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send emai
the proposal:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2016-Student-Instructions
Amit Kumar
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 1:54:38 AM UTC+5:30, Sahil Aggarwal wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am Sahil Aggarwal, Sophomore IIT Delhi, Mathematics and Computing.
> I am new to the open source community. I w
That's a great news. Kudos SymPy Development Team!
Amit Kumar
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 1:32:33 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> I'm proud the announce that SymPy version 1.0 has been released. To
> install this release use
>
> pip install -U sympy
>
> o
e so i am contacing you.
Please guide me
Madhudeep Petwal
--
*Amit Kumar*
ᐧ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegro
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 7:48:52 PM UTC+5:30, Kshitij Saraogi wrote:
>
>
>>>- Handling multidimensional sets
>>> The Ideas Page states that we need to implement few functions to
>>>handle multidimensional set objects.
>>>We have a ProductSet class which represents Cartesian
18]: bool = Interval(3, 5).as_relational(x)
In [19]: bool
Out[19]: 3 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 5
In [20]: bool.as_set()
Out[20]: [3, 5]
>
>-
>
>Do we still have them in our codebase or has it been removed ?
>Moreover, I would like to know a good usecase for this.
>
> Feel free to add th
you mentioned, I am not able to make much
sense from it for implementing a special case solver. Though, when you
would write your plan of execution, It may get more clear then.
> There seems to be some issue with the solve_univariate_inequality
function.
It seems like a bug.
Amit Ku
, as inequality solvers calls solve/solveset
internally. So we need to make sure the solveset returns the correct
results.
Amit Kumar
On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 3:07:36 PM UTC+5:30, Kshitij Saraogi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Another point I would like to know about is the state of
On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 1:58:19 AM UTC+5:30, Kshitij Saraogi wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:35:27 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>> 1. Search Based Solvers:
>>
>> This idea is currently vague, we need to figure out ho
Great News!
Good work! Aaron, Ondrej, Jason!
Cheers!
Amit Kumar
On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 12:37:06 AM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrote:
>
> Congrats!
>
> And thanks for the hard work from Aaron and Ondrej to make the new
> application super good!
>
> https://summer
elaborate on what other features are we expecting ?
See this for motivation: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/10008
Best Regards,
Amit Kumar
On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 7:56:31 PM UTC+5:30, Kshitij Saraogi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I am Kshitij Saraogi and I will be a GSoC
Hi!
I am willing to participate as a mentor.
Regards,
AMiT Kumar
On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 2:29:41 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> GSoC organization applications are now open. We can apply as an org, but
> before we do, I want to know how many people we have who can mento
Hi Everyone,
This is to notify that I am giving a talk on SymPy at Python Delhi User
Group Meetup on 5th Feb 2016 at 2:00 PM IST.
If anyone would be in New Delhi tomorrow, make sure to catch up with me. :)
Venue Details:
Meetup Link: http://www.meetup.com/pydelhi/events/226049215/
Cheers,
AMiT
Sorry, the Date is Saturday, February 6, 2016.
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 12:56:11 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is to notify that I am giving a talk on SymPy at Python Delhi User
> Group Meetup on 5th Feb 2016 at 2:00 PM IST.
> If anyone wou
Sorry! the Date is Saturday, February 6, 2016.
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 12:56:11 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is to notify that I am giving a talk on SymPy at Python Delhi User
> Group Meetup on 5th Feb 2016 at 2:00 PM IST.
> If anyone wou
I think we should go for it, atleast we can mentor a project or two.
I guess this doesn't requires us to sponsor the student.
Amit Kumar
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 8:40:15 PM UTC+5:30, Sumith 1896 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Rails Girls Summer of Code(http://railsgirlssumm
Hi Gaurav & Sartaj!
Great to know you will join us there!
Cheers,
AMiT Kumar
On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 10:09:00 PM UTC+5:30, Gaurav Dhingra wrote:
>
> Hi Amit and Sartaj,
>
> I have now been given push access to SymPy. So can i possibly join you
> guys at the
s/symbolic-computation-with-python-using-sympy/
Feel free to suggest changes. If anyone of you would be in New Delhi on 5th
March 2016, make sure to catch up with me. :)
Cheers,
AMiT Kumar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
/sympy/labels/Easy%20to%20Fix
AMiT Kumar
On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 8:02:53 PM UTC+5:30, madhur modi wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm a 2nd year student of IIIT hyderabad. I want to start my contribution
> to sympy org. I have knowledge of python programming and higher mathemati
/sympy/labels/Easy%20to%20Fix
AMiT Kumar
On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 11:23:29 PM UTC+5:30, Aditya Vyas wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am in my second year of college in engineering. I am entirely new to
> open source world. I want to participate in GSOC 16 by contributing to this
> organ
%20Fix
AMiT Kumar
On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 11:45:18 AM UTC+5:30, Harshvardhan
Tibrewal wrote:
>
> Dear Developers,
> I want to contribute to Sympy. I have knowledge of algebra calculus(etc)
> and I know python programming. I would like to learn and improve my skills
> under y
I will put the T-Shirt design on SymPy wiki for future printing. :)
AMiT Kumar
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 9:41:39 PM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
>
> Nice shirts indeed!
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Aaron Meurer <asme...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >
eed to decide the behavior deprecation policy
for `solve`.
AMiT Kumar
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 5:37:01 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> The current plan is not to deprecate the old assumptions syntax, but to
> allow both. In fact, in master, ask(Q.real(x)) will call x.is_real (it a
Hi,
Can we delay 1.0 with some other version like 0.8 or so?
It would be nice if have atleast the solve mess being fixed in 1.0
Also we have yet not settled with a single assumption system.
AMiT Kumar
On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 11:25:31 PM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> It has come
Thanks to whole SymPy team and Community for a wonderful
collaboration experience. Kudos!
Here is my Report:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Report-Amit-Kumar-:-Solvers
*AMiT Kumar*
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 1:30:00 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
The GSoC period is now
I am also Interested in getting the solution for this.
*AMiT Kumar*
On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 12:08:25 PM UTC+5:30, Gaurav Dhingra wrote:
Do you want something like replacing some function f1 (say `exponential
function` you mentioned `{exp(x): x}` ) with some other f2 (say linear
would
surely help.
*AMiT Kumar*
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 11:09:06 PM UTC+5:30, Tom H wrote:
Hi Amit,
Thanks for the speedy response! If I understand the code
in gauss_jordan_solve correctly, solving A*x=b with multiple right hand
sides requires a call to gauss_jordan_solve for each
/sympy
--
*AMiT Kumar*
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 4:53:15 AM UTC+5:30, Tom H wrote:
I came across the following issue when trying to use Sympy to compute an
LU decomposition of a matrix. I'd like to determine the number of solutions
a system of equations has, for example
about solveset, please add
a comment on:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/9500
Thanks,
*AMiT Kumar*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr
at-least 6-7 people taking up, as interested for helping out with
the responsibilities in a non-formal way.
*AMiT Kumar*
On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 5:18:54 PM UTC+5:30, Kalevi Suominen wrote:
On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 4:11:30 AM UTC+3, Jason Moore wrote:
After discussions at SciPy, we decided
That's a *bug*.
The behavior of FiniteSet while having symbolic elements into it
was recently changed here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/9540
So, the new behavior, is yet not implemented for all other operations,
that's probably one of the reasons for this.
*AMiT Kumar*
On Saturday
good, almost most of us made there including
Sumith, Sartaj, Sahil me.
Thanks,
*AMiT Kumar*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr
Hi brombo,
The simplest thing, I can think of as of now:
In [23]: a = (Abs(sin(w))/cos(w)) + Abs(w)
In [24]: S(str(a).replace('Abs', ''))
Out[24]: w + sin(w)/cos(w)
*AMiT Kumar*
On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 5:57:15 PM UTC+5:30, brombo wrote:
Is there a simple way of removing all absolute
On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 8:53:45 PM UTC+5:30, Renato Coutinho wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to use
a = Abs(sin(w))/cos(w) + Abs(w)
a.replace(Abs, Id)
rather than deal with strings?
Yes, that is certainly better, I couldn't recall this, earlier.
Thanks!
*AMiT Kumar*
--
You
On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 1:59:01 AM UTC+5:30, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 21:59 schrieb Aaron Meurer:
Here is the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdFYj9NwD3g
That video is private, so outsiders can't see it.
Yesterday, It was public.
*AMiT Kumar*
--
You
believe the issue on the Google Group is
different to the one I'm reporting here.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sympy/ufuncify/sympy/kgzcR8Qu7s4/RAGTw7A0I3oJ
I'm running sympy 0.7.6-1, which I installed via the Canopy Package Manager
on OSX Yosemite 10.10.3, 64 bit.
*AMiT Kumar
Hi Kakarla,
See this:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/9550#issuecomment-113738681
*AMiT Kumar*
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 4:58:41 AM UTC+5:30, Kakarla Dinesh wrote:
Why don't we have Cramers Method and Computation of Eigen Vectors in Sympy
--
You received this message because you
Apart from stats module, few more tests are Failing:
https://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/67354711
--
AMiT Kumar
On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 1:58:02 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
What exactly fails in the stats module?
My guess is that the sets module will need to be able to have
Hi!
The default value of evaluate in Point class is True, which means
Floats are automatically converted to Rational unless the
evaluate flag is False.
Point(0.5, 0.25) # default is evaluate=True
Point(1/2, 1/4)
Point(0.5, 0.25, evaluate=False)
Point(0.5, 0.25)
*AMiT Kumar
On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 5:56:17 PM UTC+5:30, Amit Saha wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:01 PM, AMiT Kumar dtu@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hi Amit,
The `gen` argument corresponds to the symbol you are solving for
the univariate inequality (expr).
Example
)
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 5:03:25 AM UTC+5:30, Amit Saha wrote:
Hi all,
What does the gen argument mean in the context of
solve_univariate_inequality(expr, gen, relational=True) [1] ?
[1]
http://docs.sympy.org
, which is still in development. Hopefully, soon
we will have both of these tied together.
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
On Sunday, May 3, 2015 at 4:06:56 PM UTC+5:30, Gaurav Dhingra wrote:
Hi everyone
from sympy import *
from
Yes, It is a bug Indeed.
Thanks for reporting.
Fixed in this PR: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/9231
Please have a look.
*Reference:*
http://functions.wolfram.com/ElementaryFunctions/ArcCosh/02/
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ArcCosh%5B-z%5D
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 8:10:18 PM
and suggest changes, I have fixed the formatting as well.
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 12:08:45 AM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am AMiT Kumar, I would be GSoC Applicant to SymPy this year. I have been
following
Thanks Chris, for pointing me to that PR, I did had a look at that.
That PR, exposed me to the mess of solving linear systems in solvers.
AMiT Kumar
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 8:07:00 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Smith wrote:
See also https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2580 which started some work
when you submit your proposal in
Melange. I would just try to make it look as good as possible in
Melange, and provide a link to the wiki so people can read it there.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:39 PM, AMiT Kumar dtu@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hi
It looks good only while preview in Melange, but doesn't renders
same formatting, when It's submitted.
AMiT Kumar
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 7:43:33 AM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
@Aaron @Jason
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 7:19:14 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
If the Malange form
')
# classify by univariate and multivariate
if len(free_symbols) == 1:
phints.append('univariate')
elif len(free_symbols) 1:
phints.append('multivariate')
return phints
Thanks,
AMiT Kumar
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 1:44:38 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
Sorry
Hi,
Sorry for late reply, (I was busy with Mid terms Assignments).
Based on the above Ideas, I have made the draft of my Proposal on SymPy
wiki, Please have a look:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Application-AMiT-Kumar--Solvers-:-Extending-Solveset
Thanks,
AMiT Kumar
3rd
As of now, I am doing an Audit of solving of Linear systems to
tackle this Problem.
Cheers!
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group
solvers, without messing with
the others, and we will have a more robust and flexible framework
which will be easy to extend.
I think, building a robust framework, which felicitates further
development, worth much more than adding new solvers.
Thoughts from the community are invited.
AMiT Kumar
On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 11:19:46 AM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi AMiT,
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:43 PM, AMiT Kumar dtu@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
From the above list of organizations, I think the organizations I should
apply for
that fits
. (Correct me If I am wrong.)
Do I need to talk to them as well?
AMiT Kumar
On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 5:46:31 AM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi,
I've spent lot's of time yesterday and today talking to other GSoC
organizations and a lot of them very generously agreed to consider
sympy
involvement. We were selected and
since SymPy is a component of SageMath, it makes sense that we try to help
out if possible. As a first step, I've added a link to your idea list to
our ideas list.
http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015
Great to hear that.
Thanks Harald!
AMiT Kumar
-- Harald
On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 12:33:51 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:53 PM, AMiT Kumar dtu@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
One correction:
* System of Multivariate Equations:
We CAN implement this for comparatively lower order polynomial in new
One correction:
* System of Multivariate Equations:
We CAN implement this for comparatively lower order polynomial in new
solveset.
The only thing We can't implement is Multivariate inequalities, as we will
need CAD for that.
On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 6:58:51 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar
,
transcendental Equations, etc.
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 12:08:45 AM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am AMiT Kumar, I would be GSoC Applicant to SymPy this year. I have been
following the SymPy Community
To get started, please have a look at this:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/introduction-to-contributing
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 5:10:50 AM UTC+5:30, Balkrishna Srivastava
wrote:
Hi,
I am a 3rd year
+ 3*x)*(x + log*x) + x**2)/
(x*(x + log*x)*(x + sqrt*(x + log*x))), x]/sqrt
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Kalevi Suominen jks...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Sympy currently uses the parallel Risch
, as last year we underestimated
the work, that's why we were not able to complete all the things mentioned
in Harsh's proposal.
I would keep this thread updated, parallel to my progress on my proposal.
Thanks,
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
On Saturday
have the Full version of that book. I can give
you, if you want.
Though I am not sure If I should attach a copyright material here.
I would better mail you if you could provide me your Email.
Cheers!
Amit Kumar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 4:35:37 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 3:52:23 AM UTC+5:30, Luv Agarwal wrote:
Hello,
can someone please tell me how should I go on understanding the current
Risch Algorithm implementation. The docs doesn't explain
to some, which are good enough?
dig into other older CAS
maybe like maxima?
and probably you should ask professor Fateman for
help. He can be harsh but if you have a thick skin he can be a lot of help
too.
Sure, I will try to get some help from him.
Cheers!
AMiT Kumar
--
You received
Thanks, Jason
I have pasted this in my Application Draft and moved to Sympy Wiki:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Application-AMiT-Kumar--Solvers-:-Extending-Solveset
Cheers!
AMiT Kumar
3rd Year Undergrad
Delhi Technological University
www.iamit.in
On Friday, February 6, 2015
Hi,
I am AMiT Kumar, I would be GSoC Applicant to SymPy this year. I have been
following the SymPy Community for quite sometime now and have also got
around 11-12 patches Merged in the Code base. So, now, I have got a decent
idea of `How things works`.
I would like to work on Solvers
Thanks Harsh, I do have that PR in my TODO List. We need to consider output
API (return type) also while replacing `solve` with `solveset` functions. I
am working on that.
AMiT Kumar
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 1:10:28 PM UTC+5:30, Harsh Gupta wrote:
Currently solve and solveset, both
Forgot to mention:
Currently solve and solveset, both are dependent on the submodule
inequalities.py (in solvers) for solving inequalities, which eventually
also uses solve().
On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 7:55:38 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote:
Yes, the new solveset always returns set
to
implement this summer to extend the capabilities of solveset.
Amit Kumar
3rd Year UnderGrad
Delhi Technological University
http://www.iamit.in
On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 2:52:58 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
I think the new solveset will always return a set object. I don't know
Though, I am comparatively new to SymPy, but I have pinged Sergey a lot for
PR reviews, his comments always had some sort of learning involved. Today I
feel pretty disappointed as Sergey has left Sympy. He has been a great
source of learning for me atleast.
His contribution to SymPy is
Hi!
A lot of things pertaining to the proposal has been implemented. The best
thing would be look at his work here:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pulls/akshayah3 , See what's missing.
Cheers!
Amit Kumar
3rd Year UnderGrad
Delhi Technological University
http://www.iamit.in
On Monday, January
Yes, we can convert set Interval to Boolean object,using as_relational().
In [4]: Interval(0,1).as_relational(x)
Out[4]: 0 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 1
Thanks Sergey, for clearing the doubt.
Cheers!
Amit Kumar.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group
Hi,
I am AMiT Kumar, a 3rd year Undergrad Pursuing Mathematics and Computing
Engineering, at Delhi Technological University, India.
I was going through the inequalities solvers, while working on this issue:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/8715 , I saw that inequality solvers
returns
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
