Hi!
After having read the page again, it's not more clear than before. Even I have
some more questions:
Why do generators receive three directory paths: Should the generator decide
where at those three paths to add a unit? How should it know? Wouldn't it be
easier to provide one path and adjus
>>> Trent Piepho schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 18:54 in
>>> Nachricht
<1557939250.4229.111.ca...@impinj.com>:
> On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 10:03 +, systemd-devel-
> requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you are looking for a generic converter of foreign stuff into
>> classic, persistent sy
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:21 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> I have a systemd timer that starts a service, and the service executes
> a script that downloads data files once a day. Once the data files are
> retrieved I don't need the timer for the remainder of the day.
> However, I need the time agai
15.05.2019 23:21, Jeffrey Walton пишет:
> I have a systemd timer that starts a service, and the service executes
> a script that downloads data files once a day. Once the data files are
> retrieved I don't need the timer for the remainder of the day.
> However, I need the time again the next day.
>
I have a systemd timer that starts a service, and the service executes
a script that downloads data files once a day. Once the data files are
retrieved I don't need the timer for the remainder of the day.
However, I need the time again the next day.
Here are the two docs I found on scheduling a ti
Hi Everyone,
I have a systemd timer that fires early in the morning. The timer
starts a systemd service, and the service checks for updates using the
package manager. If updates are found then they are applied. The
service runs fine and is shown below.
The tail of the service schedules a reboot o
On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 10:03 +, systemd-devel-
requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
>
>
> If you are looking for a generic converter of foreign stuff into
> classic, persistent systemd unit files, then generators is not what
> you should be using. Generators are life-cycle bound to systemd
> r
Am 15.05.19 um 13:12 schrieb Ulrich Windl:
>> Well, there can always be more examples, but "generators" are
>> inherently an advanced concept: if you are writing a generator, then
>> you already should be pro enough to be able to consult the sources of
>> the various generators shipped with syste
Hello Folks,
I have enabled more debug logs & realized following 2 logs are continuously
being dump.
*Is it some known bug for systemd-journald for following version? I am
using Angstrom distribution of debian OS?*
root@arria10:~# uname -a
Linux arria10 4.9.78-ltsi #1 SMP Thu Dec 13 12:01:27 PST
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 12:20
in
Nachricht <20190515102024.GB23038@gardel-login>:
> On Mi, 15.05.19 12:12, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de)
> wrote:
>
>> >>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 15.05.2019 um
12:04
>> in
>> Nachricht <20190515100400.GB22945@gard
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:04 PM Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> When I tried to put the instances of my service into a specific slice (by
> only specifying the name), I just got an error message.
>
> I had:
> [Service]
> Slice=something
>
> in the service unit file.
Works here
_
On Mi, 15.05.19 12:12, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> >>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 12:04
> in
> Nachricht <20190515100400.GB22945@gardel-login>:
> > On Mi, 15.05.19 12:01, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni‑regensburg.de)
> wrote:
> >
> >> > Writing a
On Mi, 15.05.19 12:08, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> > I mean, if you want to persistently enable a unit that is converted
> > from something else, then please write your own converted, and write
> > something to /etc/systemd/system, there's no need whatsoever to bother
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 12:04
in
Nachricht <20190515100400.GB22945@gardel-login>:
> On Mi, 15.05.19 12:01, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni‑regensburg.de)
wrote:
>
>> > Writing a generator is not a typical user would do. It's what a
>> > developer of a package would do, a
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 12:03
in
Nachricht <20190515100311.GA22945@gardel-login>:
> On Mi, 15.05.19 11:57, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni‑regensburg.de)
wrote:
>
>> >> could call "systemctl add‑wants ‑‑transient" to do the job,
>> >> but at that point, that's more pedan
On Mi, 15.05.19 12:01, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> > Writing a generator is not a typical user would do. It's what a
> > developer of a package would do, and yes, in that case, when you write
> > code you need a bit more understanding of the underpinnings and need
> >
On Mi, 15.05.19 11:57, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> >> could call "systemctl add-wants --transient" to do the job,
> >> but at that point, that's more pedantic than practical. If you write a
> >> generator, your systemd-fu should be high enough to know and
> >> underst
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 11:54
in
Nachricht <20190515095443.GA22887@gardel-login>:
> On Mi, 15.05.19 12:47, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > > localhost:~ # systemctl enable usr‑local.mount
>> > > Failed to enable unit: Unit /run/systemd/generator/usr‑lo
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 11:31
in
Nachricht <20190515093135.GF22719@gardel-login>:
> On Mi, 15.05.19 11:29, Jérémy ROSEN (jeremy.ro...@smile.fr) wrote:
>
>> well, in another thread, it was discussed why generated should never have
>> an install section and why enablement do
On Mi, 15.05.19 12:47, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > localhost:~ # systemctl enable usr-local.mount
> > > Failed to enable unit: Unit /run/systemd/generator/usr-local.mount is
> > > transient or generated.
> > > localhost:~ # exit
> >
> > Hmm?
> >
> > No? Why?
>
> You just sa
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:29 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Mi, 15.05.19 12:25, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:17 PM Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > To me it's the most horrible part of systemd: Messing with
> > > > symlinks...
>
On Mi, 15.05.19 11:29, Jérémy ROSEN (jeremy.ro...@smile.fr) wrote:
> well, in another thread, it was discussed why generated should never have
> an install section and why enablement does not make sense for them...
> so no it's not a bug.
>
> Arguably, yes, generators do need to care about symlink
Am 15.05.19 um 11:25 schrieb Andrei Borzenkov:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:17 PM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>>>
>>> To me it's the most horrible part of systemd: Messing with
>>> symlinks...
>>
>> You should never need to. For all relevant operations there are
>> "systemctl" verbs, i.e. "syste
well, in another thread, it was discussed why generated should never have
an install section and why enablement does not make sense for them...
so no it's not a bug.
Arguably, yes, generators do need to care about symlinks, though, maybe the
could call "systemctl add-wants --transient" to do the j
On Mi, 15.05.19 12:25, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:17 PM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > >
> > > To me it's the most horrible part of systemd: Messing with
> > > symlinks...
> >
> > You should never need to. For all relevant operations there are
> >
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:17 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> >
> > To me it's the most horrible part of systemd: Messing with
> > symlinks...
>
> You should never need to. For all relevant operations there are
> "systemctl" verbs, i.e. "systemctl enable", "systemctl disable",
> "systemctl add-want
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 11:04
>>> in
Nachricht <20190515090447.GA22719@gardel-login>:
[...]
>> I just noticed: If you use a "argv[0] override" for your command, it's not
>> just that the command is started with that name, it's also displayed as
>> ExecStart here (not path
Hi!
When I tried to put the instances of my service into a specific slice (by only
specifying the name), I just got an error message.
I had:
[Service]
Slice=something
in the service unit file. Amazingly systemd does put my instances in a slice
when I removed that Slice line. The slice is named
On Mi, 15.05.19 10:14, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> >> >> Why "bad"?
> >> >
> >> > Again - this has improved in current version which now tells you that
> >> > unit is generated.
> >>
> >> So there's nothing wrong with the unit?
The string shown on your version is a b
On Mi, 15.05.19 07:48, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> >> Or more like this (in the user directory):?
> >> > systemd‑analyze verify systemd/iotwatch.target.in
> >> Failed to open /dev/tty0: Permission denied
> >> Failed to load systemd/iotwatch.target.in: Invalid argument
On Mi, 15.05.19 11:04, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When I tried to put the instances of my service into a specific slice (by
> only specifying the name), I just got an error message.
>
> I had:
> [Service]
> Slice=something
>
> in the service unit file. Amazi
On Mi, 15.05.19 08:49, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> First, is it a well-known bug that "--quitet" seems to be ignored for
> "systemctl status"? It's the only command where --quiet makes sense IMHO, but
> it seems to have no effect in v228.
"systemctl status" i
Hi,
I have the following setup:
* home made router that I configured all on my own including
compilation, running dnsmasq to provide everything from dhcp to slaac
and dns.
* said dnsmasq has no dnssec support. It is neither compiled in the
binary nor set up in the dnsmasq.conf file.
* systemd-
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 15.05.2019 um 09:21 in
Nachricht
:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:01 AM Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>>
>> >>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 14.05.2019 um 20:21
in
>> Nachricht :
>> > 14.05.2019 16:39, Ulrich Windl пишет:
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> Developing my first systemd serv
Am 14.05.19 um 08:35 schrieb Ulrich Windl:
>> stop it - if you would have read IT news (golem/heise) the last 7 years
>> or so you would know about /run and why it is a top-directory
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard
>>
>> /run
>>
>> Run-time variable data: Inform
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:01 AM Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> >>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 14.05.2019 um 20:21 in
> Nachricht :
> > 14.05.2019 16:39, Ulrich Windl пишет:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Developing my first systemd service I have some problems I don't
> understand:
> >> After installation, I get t
36 matches
Mail list logo