W dniu 26.10.2020 o 11:19, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On So, 25.10.20 18:56, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote:
W dniu 25.10.2020 o 18:36, Marcin Kocur pisze:
Hello,
as the topic states, I want to know which action(s) from "add",
"remove", "change", "move", "online", "offline",
Hi,
On 10/26/20 12:52 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 04:57:55PM +, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote:
The 10/26/2020 16:24, Dave Martin via Libc-alpha wrote:
Unrolling this discussion a bit, this problem comes from a few sources:
1) systemd is trying to implement a
A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the
tarball here:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/archive/v247-rc1.tar.gz
NOTE: This is ☠️ pre-release ☠️ software. Do not run this on production
systems, but please test this and report any issues you find to
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 23.10.2020 um 13:00
in
Nachricht <20201023110051.GA326204@gardel-login>:
> On Fr, 23.10.20 10:37, Belisko Marek (marek.beli...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > > Sorry I mixed up things. Can you pls guide where can I find code which
>> > > set date/time from timestamp?
I currently have wpa_supplicant setup to connect my WLE600VX to my
802.11S mesh network. It connects fine.
However when I setup my systemd.network file as the following.
[Match]
Name=wlp6s0
WLANInterfaceType="mesh-point"
It doesn't want to match even though wlp6s0 is currently connected to
On So, 25.10.20 18:36, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as the topic states, I want to know which action(s) from "add", "remove",
> "change", "move", "online", "offline", "bind", and "unbind" were triggered
> on my device. Is there any way to check that?
>
> At the
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:36:42 +0100
Marcin Kocur wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as the topic states, I want to know which action(s) from "add",
> "remove", "change", "move", "online", "offline", "bind", and "unbind"
> were triggered on my device. Is there any way to check that?
>
> At the beginning of
On So, 25.10.20 18:56, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote:
> W dniu 25.10.2020 o 18:36, Marcin Kocur pisze:
> > Hello,
> >
> > as the topic states, I want to know which action(s) from "add",
> > "remove", "change", "move", "online", "offline", "bind", and "unbind"
> > were triggered on my
On Mo, 26.10.20 11:28, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > So the ultimate quesiton is: what kind of trigger was executed on my
> > device on boot time?
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> FWIW, I was totally baffled by a similar problem with a DRM device. My
> rule was doing the same thing: match to
Hello,
[I was off for one week]
On 16/10/2020 15:45, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
If I remember correctly, it's so that the main process would still be
able to have pid 1 as its parent, without introducing an intermediate
step in the process tree.
My understanding after thinking about it would
Hello!
Latest Fedora Rawhide here.
I've exactly one user created with --auto-login=yes
/etc/gdm/custom.conf is unchanged and as far as I know,
no .conf file is created in other places.
How is --auto-login supposed to work?
Should I open an issue on github?
Thanks and BR,
Damian
On 26.10.2020 18.24, Dave Martin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:44:46PM -0500, Jeremy Linton via Libc-alpha wrote:
Hi,
There is a problem with glibc+systemd on BTI enabled systems. Systemd
has a service flag "MemoryDenyWriteExecute" which uses seccomp to deny
PROT_EXEC changes. Glibc
* Dave Martin via Libc-alpha:
> Would it now help to add something like:
>
> int mchangeprot(void *addr, size_t len, int old_flags, int new_flags)
> {
> int ret = -EINVAL;
> mmap_write_lock(current->mm);
> if (all vmas in [addr .. addr + len) have
> their
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:56:35PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 02:52:46PM +, Catalin Marinas via Libc-alpha
> wrote:
> > Now, if the dynamic loader silently ignores the mprotect() failure on
> > the main executable, is there much value in exposing a flag in the aux
>
What are the state of things and the plan for the future with respect to
iwd and systemd-networkd? A couple of years ago, I put together a
satisfactory solution for my project in OpenEmbedded/Yocto using
systemd-networkd to manage the IP connections and wpa_supplicant to
manage the underlying
On 26.10.2020 16.52, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 02:01:30PM +0300, Topi Miettinen wrote:
On 23.10.2020 12.02, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 01:02:18PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Regardless, it makes sense to me to have the kernel load the executable
itself
16 matches
Mail list logo
