On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, David Timothy Strauss
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jason St. John wrote:
>> "init.debug" would be better than "systemd.debug", in my opinion. It
>> is shorter (less typing and no possible end-user confusion over
>> "systemd.debug" vs. "system.debug"), a
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jason St. John wrote:
> "init.debug" would be better than "systemd.debug", in my opinion. It
> is shorter (less typing and no possible end-user confusion over
> "systemd.debug" vs. "system.debug"), and it is init-agnostic. Other
> init systems (OpenRC, Upstart, etc.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:11:47AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> > From: Greg KH
>> >
>> > If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
>>
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 11:32:50PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:16:12PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 a
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 11:32:50PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:16:12PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:11:47AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu,
Am 05.04.2014 23:22, schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> The whole issue started with bug #76935: the original reporter was
> seemingly unaware of available kernel commandline options, and his
> comments fairly quickly degenerated to rude personal attacks. It's
> something that one sees quite o
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:16:12PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:11:47AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> > > From: Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:16:12PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:11:47AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > > From: Greg KH
> > >
> > > If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:11:47AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > From: Greg KH
> >
> > If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
> > into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> From: Greg KH
>
> If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
> into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
> everything else (with the exception of "quiet"). Some people want
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > From: Greg KH
> >
> > If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
> > into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
>
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> From: Greg KH
>
> If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
> into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
> everything else (with the exception of "quiet"). Some people want
From: Greg KH
If the kernel is started with "debug", that's for the kernel to switch
into debug mode. We should rely on a namespace for our options, like
everything else (with the exception of "quiet"). Some people want to
only debug the kernel, not systemd, and the opposite as well so make
eve
13 matches
Mail list logo
