On 10/06/15 03:18, Daurnimator wrote:
example use case, I'm testing a client/server protocol:
- the server is running locally; and because it shouldn't be exposed
to the internet, it is bound to localhost.
- I start the client and tell it to connect to $HOSTNAME
Why wouldn't you tell the
On 3 June 2015 at 06:40, Daurnimator q...@daurnimator.com wrote:
I was playing around with nss, and found that my loopback interface ip
doesn't appear from nss-myhostname.
Rather, my other ones do.
Furthermore, unless I request IPv4, link-local IPv6 addresses are
returned. Is this expected?
On 06/09/2015 10:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.06.15 19:33, Jakub Skořepa (ja...@skorepa.info) wrote:
Hello,
My name is Jakub Skořepa and I'm working on Cockpit UI for Systemd
Timers.
For that I need to create and modify systemd unit files. Cockpit uses D
-Bus for everything
Hello,
/usr/local/sbin/local is a bash script which calls several functions.
When
one of these functions fails, i.e. returns another value than zero, the
script calls this function:
die() {
STRING=$1
echo 2 Error occured in function ${STRING}
echo Press any key to reboot (sorry for
On Wed, 10.06.15 06:44, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Filipe Brandenburger [2015-06-09 12:55 -0700]:
I think a more productive advice would be for reviewers to avoid using
line comments for anything that is wanted for posterity and instead
only use them to say typo or comment
On 06/10/2015 09:23 AM, Jan Synáček wrote:
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5. There are multiple
references to this PR that say user referenced this pull request from
a commit in commit, which is hilarious, as those clearly are not
references to this PR. Their commit messages
On 10/06/15 11:46, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I hate to say this since I'm against litter unit files across the entire
filesystem like infective disease and administrator then have to run
around trying to chase them down but is it not better to store this
under /srv somewhere [1], not etc,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:01:18AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.06.15 14:54, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 09.06.15 13:04, Filipe Brandenburger
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 14:04, Martin Jansa (martin.ja...@gmail.com) wrote:
WHat really surprises me about the whole discussion is that we cannot
be the first ones running into this. Given the success of github this
Hi, All,
According to the DBus protocol,
http://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-specification.html
An example argument path match is arg0path='/aa/bb/'. This would match
messages with first arguments of '/', '/aa/', '/aa/bb/', '/aa/bb/cc/' and
'/aa/bb/cc'. It would not match
B1;4002;0cOn Wed, 10.06.15 13:25, Simon McVittie
(simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
On 10/06/15 11:46, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I hate to say this since I'm against litter unit files across the entire
filesystem like infective disease and administrator then have to run
around
On 06/10/2015 12:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
A good overview of what we're aiming to accomplish can be found here: h
ttps://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/wiki/Feature:-Systemd
-timers#stories
Though at the end of the day, it might be fair to say that systemd
timers are cool and very
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 10:46 +,
On 06/09/2015 10:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.06.15 19:33, Jakub Skořepa (ja...@skorepa.info) wrote:
Hello,
My name is Jakub Skořepa and I'm working on Cockpit UI for
Systemd
Timers.
For that I need to create and modify
Sorry for forgetting attach the C file.
Best Regards,
Li Cheng
At 2015-06-10 20:35:11, eshar...@163.com wrote:
Hi, All,
According to the DBus protocol,
http://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-specification.html
An example argument path match is arg0path='/aa/bb/'. This would
On Wed, 10.06.15 14:04, Martin Jansa (martin.ja...@gmail.com) wrote:
WHat really surprises me about the whole discussion is that we cannot
be the first ones running into this. Given the success of github this
must be a common issue. And if it is, then either github is actually
prety bad,
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5. There are multiple
references to this PR that say user referenced this pull request from
a commit in commit, which is hilarious, as those clearly are not
references to this PR. Their commit messages contain the string #5 and
Github thinks it means a
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 09.06.15 13:04, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
[...] so we comment and ask for a new PR, and close
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 21:22 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Le 09. 06. 15 19:52, Dan Williams a écrit :
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 19:34 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Le 09. 06. 15 17:43, Dan Williams a écrit :
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 16:16 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Le
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 13:21 +,
On 06/10/2015 12:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
A good overview of what we're aiming to accomplish can be found
here: h
ttps://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/wiki/Feature:-Systemd
-timers#stories
Though at the end of the day, it might be
Patchset imported to github.
To create a pull request, one of the main developers has to initiate one via:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:20150610.144033.42163196.d.hatayama%40jp.fujitsu.com
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
Hello again,
Martin Pitt [2015-06-09 13:00 +0200]:
I was about to (re-)enable seccomp support in our systemd packages,
and to write an integration test for it. However, it seems that this
currently does not seem to work at all.
For the archives: Not sure what went wrong yesterday, today it
On 06/10/2015 03:09 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 14:53, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
WHat really surprises me about the whole discussion is that we cannot
be the first ones running into this. Given the success of github this
must be a common issue. And
On Wed, 10.06.15 16:20, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Without proper infrastructure ( or at least the wills to acquire such ) how
can you ( or any of us for that matter ) with a straight face advocate for
consolidation and call systemd the modern building block of an OS (
On 06/10/2015 03:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
You make some good points Jóhann. It probably does make sense to focus
(at least at first) on managing timer units shipped alongside services
as opposed to trying to develop a UI for managing arbitrary timer
units. I'll discuss this with some of
Am 10.06.2015 um 08:05 schrieb systemd github import bot:
Patchset imported to github.
To create a pull request, one of the main developers has to initiate one via:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:20150610.144033.42163196.d.hatayama%40jp.fujitsu.com
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want good review tool, why not use gerrit?
+1 for Gerrit as a code review tool.
It's not perfect, but from all of them that I've used it seems to get
the most right:
- Review *commits* and not PRs (tends to
B1;4002;0cOn Wed, 10.06.15 08:25, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com)
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Alban Crequy al...@endocode.com wrote:
Instead, just reuse the same PR and use `git push -f` to ship new
versions of the commits to the same branch... Yes it's awful but
On 06/10/2015 05:53 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/10/2015 12:35 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 14:04, Martin Jansa (martin.ja...@gmail.com) wrote:
WHat really surprises me about the whole discussion is that we cannot
be the first ones running into this. Given the
On 06/10/2015 07:04 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Jan Synáček jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5. There are multiple
references to this PR that say user referenced this pull request from
a commit in commit, which is
On 06/10/2015 07:04 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Jan Synáček jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5. There are multiple
references to this PR that say user referenced this pull request from
a commit in commit, which is
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:38:30PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/10/2015 04:35 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 16:20, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Without proper infrastructure ( or at least the wills to acquire such )
how
can you ( or
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:04:17PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/10/2015 05:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
There's also no real need for it, I don't understand why you keep
insisting there is given how well things have been working so far.
I do understand and am aware of the complication
ima_write_policy() expects data to be written as one or more
rules, no more than PAGE_SIZE at a time. Easiest way to ensure
that we are not splitting rules is to read and write on line at
a time.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226948
---
src/core/ima-setup.c | 39
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 20:52 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Le 10. 06. 15 16:36, Dan Williams a écrit :
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 21:22 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
This black list, grey list, and white list system is a mess and have to
die. No other application do that way
Patchset imported to github.
To create a pull request, one of the main developers has to initiate one via:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1433965127-19648-1-git-send-email-zbyszek%40in.waw.pl
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
On Wed, 10.06.15 17:38, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Without proper infrastructure ( or at least the wills to acquire such )
how
can you ( or any of us for that matter ) with a straight face advocate for
consolidation and call systemd the modern building block of an OS
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:38:30PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/10/2015 04:35 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 16:20, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Without proper infrastructure ( or at least the wills to acquire such )
how
can you ( or
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:38:30PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/10/2015 04:35 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 16:20, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Without proper infrastructure ( or at least the wills to acquire such )
how
can you ( or
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Jan Synáček jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5. There are multiple
references to this PR that say user referenced this pull request from
a commit in commit, which is hilarious, as those clearly are not
references to this
On 06/10/2015 05:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
There's also no real need for it, I don't understand why you keep
insisting there is given how well things have been working so far.
I do understand and am aware of the complication ( legal and otherwise
social aspect of it etc ) involved with bringing
On 06/10/2015 04:35 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 16:20, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Without proper infrastructure ( or at least the wills to acquire such ) how
can you ( or any of us for that matter ) with a straight face advocate for
consolidation
On Wed, 10.06.15 11:17, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
On 10/06/15 03:18, Daurnimator wrote:
example use case, I'm testing a client/server protocol:
- the server is running locally; and because it shouldn't be exposed
to the internet, it is bound to localhost.
On Wed, 10.06.15 12:18, Daurnimator (q...@daurnimator.com) wrote:
On 9 June 2015 at 20:36, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 03.06.15 16:31, Daurnimator (q...@daurnimator.com) wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 16:01, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed,
On Fri, 29.05.15 11:47, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
For the sake of the archives: this was merged as:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/8
---
src/shared/random-util.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/random-util.c
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 00:40 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Le 10. 06. 15 23:37, Bjørn Mork a écrit :
Jean-Christian de Rivaz j...@eclis.ch writes:
There is not so
much modem manufacturers and each of them don't even release a new
product range per year.
Ehh... I don't think we
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 01:16:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 15:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
ima_write_policy() expects data to be written as one or more
rules, no more than PAGE_SIZE at a time. Easiest way to ensure
that we are not
On Mon, 01.06.15 17:28, Krzesimir Nowak (krzesi...@endocode.com) wrote:
For the sake of the archives: further discussion on this patch set now
takes place on gihub:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/49
Hi,
When having a container that keeps its journal inside overlayfs,
journalctl
On Wed, 10.06.15 15:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
ima_write_policy() expects data to be written as one or more
rules, no more than PAGE_SIZE at a time. Easiest way to ensure
that we are not splitting rules is to read and write on line at
a time.
On Mon, 01.06.15 13:56, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
In cgtop,mount-setup,nspawn the name= prefix is hard-coded in the
mount options, and the define is not used.
Everywhere else, we explicitly white-list allow 'name=' prefix to be
used with all controllers, and
On 06/10/2015 07:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:04:17PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/10/2015 05:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
There's also no real need for it, I don't understand why you keep
insisting there is given how well things have been working so far.
I do
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 02:01:06AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/10/2015 07:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:04:17PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/10/2015 05:46 PM, Greg KH wrote:
There's also no real need for it, I don't understand why you keep
On Wed, 10.06.15 14:53, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
WHat really surprises me about the whole discussion is that we cannot
be the first ones running into this. Given the success of github this
must be a common issue. And if it is, then either github is actually
prety bad,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Alban Crequy al...@endocode.com wrote:
Instead, just reuse the same PR and use `git push -f` to ship new
versions of the commits to the same branch... Yes it's awful but
unfortunately that's how GitHub works...
Yeah, it is awful, and loses all the comments, as
53 matches
Mail list logo
