]
Subject: t-and-f: Regionals
It seems to me that the simplest way to solve most of the problems
involving regionals would be to set back the NCAA championship meet by a
week
or two -- where it used to be.
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:39:44 EDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: regionals won't kill the NCAA schedule
Well, the USC-UCLA meet has traditionally been the first Saturday in May, and
the weather has generally been pretty good for it. Moving it a week earlier
would probably
I'd love to see a variation on golf's U.S. open scenario, where 25% of the USATF nationals participants come via local and regional qualifiers. It would create more local publicity for the national meet without affecting the top places very much. More importantly, it would create a logical and
Excuse me, but what percentage of the time when a gun is fired at Penn is
there
even the theoretical possibility of an NCAA qualifying mark being recorded?
While I cannot answer to Division I (and I know that a lot of the list members
believe that DI is the only real track and field division
Dan wrote:
The problem with that being the head to head competition in track and
field as opposed to golf. If you let local runners into a meet who
wouldn't normally be there, they are most likely going to get beaten
handily. In golf it isn't as easy to see because Johnny Local and
Tiger
In a message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:26:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "denise
lockett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just don't understand all the whining about a change that seems so clearly
positive from the point of view of encouraging competition.
Because you've uncovered one of the
In a message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 1:47:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, the USC-UCLA meet has traditionally been the first Saturday in May, and the
weather has generally been pretty good for it. Moving it a week earlier would
probably invite poorer weather.
Have to agree. Certainly thre will be some wrinkles and bugs to work out as
folks absorb the change. Big thing is it may help pump a bit of life into
college track which has been moving toward terminal for a long time. We
can't achieve March Madness but at least this may help get more notice
I just don't understand all the whining about a change that seems so
clearly positive from the point of view of encouraging competition.
Because you've uncovered one of the sport's dirty little secrets: everybody is
more interested in protecting their own teeny little bit of turf than
-collegiate
track, all of it. People should be happy to get whatever scholarships or
money they get, as its basically just charity.
Grote
adiRP/MMRD
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f
In a message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 1:13:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Jack Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If "fostering the sport as a whole" means enhancing the NCAA Championships,
I would have to agree. But, pardon my provincialism if I find conference
championships -- with their true
ast chance qualifiers is a HUGE plus.
Ed Koch
--Original Message--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 13, 2001 8:17:12 PM GMT
Subject: t-and-f: Regionals
It seems to me that the simplest way to solve most of the problems
involving regionals would be to set bac
It seems to me that the simplest way to solve most of the problems
involving regionals would be to set back the NCAA championship meet by a week
or two -- where it used to be.
In a message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2001 4:24:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
It seems to me that the simplest way to solve most of the problems
involving regionals would be to set back the NCAA championship meet by a week
or two -- where it used to be.
the
i missed one: the latest nationals ever was June 22-23 of 1934.
The first time the meet was ever held with competition in May didn't come until 1977.
gh
gh wrote:
One thing we can hope for is that the pushing back of the NCAA will also
force the USATF meetwhere it should be, even later in the year. Like the
last week of June, or even in July.
Which would then make it easier to create a nationwide set of local and
regional meets - with the
Another question - when do the various national championships of the
European countries occur? And when do the Kenyan nationals occur?
The third or fourth week of July, when the European circuit pretty
much "shuts down" to allow athletes to return to their home
countries for their NC's.
And
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Regionals
The answer for the collegiate athletes: if you're not good enough
to go to Europe (or can't accept any prize money), here's the
opportunity for USATF to set up a USATF Tier II Grand Prix circuit
from m
What about the existing U.S. IAAF meets?
They are at the beginning of the IAAF season, right? So a U.S. athlete will
run the U.S. meets before going to Europe. Then, head over to Europe for
4-5 weeks, then back for USATF nationals during the break.
No extra trips to Europe and gives athletes
Another question - when do the various national championships of the
European countries occur? And when do the Kenyan nationals occur?
The third or fourth week of July, when the European circuit pretty
much "shuts down" to allow athletes to return to their home
countries for their NC's.
ect: Re: t-and-f: Regionals
The answer for the collegiate athletes: if you're not good enough
to go to Europe (or can't accept any prize money), here's the
opportunity for USATF to set up a USATF Tier II Grand Prix circuit
from mid-June up to NC's at end of July.
Who knows, if succe
Ed- (and list)
your problem here is you think it is the NCAA's( and schools themselves)
job's to get these kids ready for International comp?? GET REAL, this list is
so off base when they talk about this stuff, it isnt funny. If those 100 or
more kids want to start in mid may that is fine,
The NCAA meet will be one week later than right now, running from Weds-Sat
as always. The regionals will be held one week prior to the current NCAA
weekend, meaning 11-15 days before the new NCAA date, depending on event.
This date for the regional is currently a non-competition weekend. The week
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 20:18:46 EDT, you wrote:
While most schools love the press that having an athlete of theirs
make the Olympic team or such gets them, don't think for a second that school
Ad's or presidents give two shits what USATF wants or does.
Agreed.
So why should USATF bend itself into
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 20:18:46 EDT, you wrote:
While most schools love the press that having an athlete of theirs
make the Olympic team or such gets them, don't think for a second that
school
Ad's or presidents give two shits what USATF wants or does.
and RT wrote:
So why should USATF bend
Well, the USC-UCLA meet has traditionally been the first Saturday in May, and
the weather has generally been pretty good for it. Moving it a week earlier
would probably invite poorer weather. The Pac-10 Championships have indeed
been only 10 days before the NCAA Championships, and it has
26 matches
Mail list logo