Hi,
I'm also using piste:type=nordic alone not only in field but also on
track/road because a lot of things are different between piste and
road. Physically, the piste is over the road but don't use his
surface. Road is open in summer, piste in winter. Piste could be
oneway and not the
From the taginfo map I wouldn't expect that we could find a global
solution. I therefore would document both solutions (destination is
already documented, preferable someone from the US has to properly
document exit_to) and state in the articles about motorway_junction
and exit_to that exit_to is
Hi all,
By accident, I found the tag landmark=cemetery on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landmark%3Dcemetery
Then discovered that 9 cemeteries are tagged with landuse=cemetery +
landmark=cemetery. Some have even an additionnal seamark:type =
landmark :
Hi,
this is a minor follow-up proposal for Conditional Restrictions.
As the discussion has shown, there are both traffic signs that restrict access
based on the actual weight and traffic signs that restrict access based on the
gross vehicle weight rating.
Here are some examples (based on
2012/11/21 David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.com
Also, the street name in addresses doesn't always match the name of the
street. For example, there are houses on Old Walker Road which retain
Walker Rd addresses. And the name Lilly Chapel Opossum Run Road is so
long, the local post office
I think you mean maximum gross vehicle weight, not just gross vehicle
weight.
Maximum GVW is documented on the registration documents. The GVW itself is
the mass of the vehicle plus specified elements
Hi,
this is a minor follow-up proposal for Conditional Restrictions.
As the discussion has
Sorry, please ignore this, it was a random thought I was preparing and I
pressed the wrong button by accident.
I think you mean maximum gross vehicle weight, not just gross vehicle
weight.
Maximum GVW is documented on the registration documents. The GVW itself is
the mass of the vehicle plus
I have encountered a border crossing Slovenia-Croatia that is only open for
local residents, but closed for other people (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/468001076/).
From the explanations on this web site of the Slovenian government
André,
Please note that for the case of Osmose [1] quality insurance tool, there
is an Integration category
(last category in the left menu)
The intention is to provide markers for elements available from datasets
published on open data portals.
These markers are not elements already in OSM
On 11/20/12 3:59 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i think we need a separate emergency access category because there
exist places where authorized
vehicles, mostly emergency responders of one type or another,
does anyone else who is not a troll have any comments?
my engagement with anthony has i
On 11/22/12 8:32 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
for u-turns that are currently frequently marked private or no, as a
temporary
expedient, and recommend in the section of the access page moving to
no u-turn
turn restrictions in the long term.
now that i've thought about it another minute, we should
On 11/22/12 9:27 AM, Anthony wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
emergency http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:emergency=* (category:
emergency motor vehicles; e.g., ambulance, fire truck, police car)
The misleading wording on key:emergency was caused by
Hi,
No more inputs for a while, do you want to vote for such a basic proposal ?
(Many would probably have just changed the wiki, but the way of tagging it
concern is hot topic, and I prefere to gather some idea before just doing
it) :
2012/11/22 sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org:
(Many would probably have just changed the wiki, but the way of tagging it
concern is hot topic, and I prefere to gather some idea before just doing
it) :
Thanks for that valuable attitude :-)
___
i did not realize that anthony is apparently restricted from posting to
tagging, and
so inflicted half of a conversation that shouldn't have appeared at all
on the list members.
sorry about that,
richard
___
Tagging mailing list
2012/11/21 A.Pirard.Papou a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
Hi,
I wanted to map the agglomeration of my village and I am wondering again.
[...]
How do we tag agglomérations?
Currently, with place=* and their relative info on a closed way. I have
written a proposal which aims to change this
specifically, no U-turn is the common signage in many jurisdictions, and
that's a
turn restriction, not an access restriction. in a perfect world, that's how
we'd have
Mostly we are interested in the result, not the signs. It's the traffic
code's
limitation, that their best option is to
On 11/22/12 12:38 PM, Kytömaa Lauri wrote:
specifically, no U-turn is the common signage in many jurisdictions, and that's
a
turn restriction, not an access restriction. in a perfect world, that's how
we'd have
Mostly we are interested in the result, not the signs. It's the traffic code's
Any established way to tag a hotel that has a lockable bicycle room for
guests?
Would
service:bicycle:parking=yes
be appropriate?
This would be in line with other bicycle services the hotel may provide,
like
service:bicycle:rental=yes
service:bicycle:repair=yes
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Richard Welty wrote:
On 11/22/12 8:32 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
for u-turns that are currently frequently marked private or no, as a
temporary
expedient, and recommend in the section of the access page moving to no
u-turn
turn restrictions in the long term.
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Volker Schmidt wrote:
I have encountered a border crossing Slovenia-Croatia that is only open
for local residents, but closed for other people (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/468001076/).
From the explanations on this web site of the Slovenian
Am 22.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Volker Schmidt:
Any established way to tag a hotel that has a lockable bicycle room
for guests?
Would
service:bicycle:parking=yes
be appropriate?
This would also mean parking outside a room, like in front of the hotel.
It would be better to use
On 11/22/12 2:53 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Richard Welty wrote:
now that i've thought about it another minute, we should use
only-straight-on restrictions
for simplicity and because the configuration (motorway-short turnaround
road-motorway)
doesn't really suit no
admin boundary levels 9 10 are unused in the US.
i see some usage of level 9 for fire district boundaries in the US.
opinions?
thanks,
richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I wouldn't use boundary=admin with admin_level unless there is actually a
hierarchical relationship with the levels above/below. Otherwise they
should really be in their own hierarchy, using something like
boundary=fire_service. AIUI the US fire departments are at the city or
county level. Can a
On 11/22/12 4:11 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
I wouldn't use boundary=admin with admin_level unless there is actually a
hierarchical relationship with the levels above/below. Otherwise they
should really be in their own hierarchy, using something like
boundary=fire_service. AIUI the US fire
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Michael S mich...@elfu.de wrote:
I wonder if it is the right way to tag this trail with higway=track, because
a user which wants to use the map for non-skiing purposes may think there is
a track where one can walk on, which is not the case.
Sounds a lot like
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
Any established way to tag a hotel that has a lockable bicycle room for
guests?
Would
service:bicycle:parking=yes
be appropriate?
This would be in line with other bicycle services the hotel may provide,
like
I wrote a Python script to upload them to Openstreetbugs. Now I'm looking
at OSMOSE and I noticed it also has a category for Openstreetbugs. I think
it still needs to be synchronized, as I see only the bugs that were already
present yesterday. If people prefer to use OSMOSE, this is certainly
Am 22.11.2012 23:30, schrieb Erik Johansson:
And then just reuse existing tagging:
private:amenity=bicycle_parking
private:amenity=bicycle_rental
Typical you would use amenity=... access=private ;) But than you can't
see if eg. a hotel has this service or not.
Henning
Reading over your comments about turn restrictions and the NY state
code, I feel like we will end up with tortuous reasoning and miss the
mark. Stepping way back and ignoring legal details, it seems like we
need a schema to express what kinds of people/vehicles/etc. may do what,
and a way to use
On 11/22/12 7:33 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Reading over your comments about turn restrictions and the NY state
code, I feel like we will end up with tortuous reasoning and miss the
mark. Stepping way back and ignoring legal details, it seems like we
need a schema to express what kinds of
admin boundary levels 9 10 are unused in the US.
i see some usage of level 9 for fire district boundaries in the US.
I don't think we should use 9/10 for fire/school/etc. Those are not
necessarily subsets of admin_level 8. If a state has a formal notion of
something less than town
On 11/22/12 7:46 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
much which i've elided, but which is all basically fair.
but i suspect there is considerable variation state to state, so whatever
we do needs to be kind of flexible and not overly prescriptive. i'm still on
the learning curve on how all this goes
I have been using mkgmap for about 3 years. I am not clear on it doing
turn restrictions, because the garmin format is reverse-engineered, and
the new version not understood. I am unaware of any other GPSr units
being capable of being translated to.
It's certainly possible to have a style file
35 matches
Mail list logo
