OK, latest draft is up at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets
It involves the discouraged ; operator, though perhaps in an acceptable use
case.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
I have revised the proposal per comments received:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Image
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
This was my first accepted proposal :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_generation_refinement
Even if its main goal was to introduce power=plant, many other existing
tags were refined too.
So I think it's the same thing : juste propose what you want to appear in
I've been using our streetviews (customstreetviews.com) to update OSM,
and would like to throw a few ideas out for consideration.
Street-level photos have a lat/long, but that location is not the
location of the item in the photo. Panoramic images, like ours, have
a lat/long of the camera, but
Am 21.06.2013 22:11, schrieb Tod Fitch:
I think that it would make sense to allow some of those tags to be
used on the way that bounds the entire campground.
For example camp_site:water=yes/no may be the same for all
sites/pitches within a campground and tagging it in one place, if
On 6/23/13 7:21 AM, Tac Tacelosky wrote:
I've been using our streetviews (customstreetviews.com) to update OSM,
and would like to throw a few ideas out for consideration.
Street-level photos have a lat/long, but that location is not the
location of the item in the photo. Panoramic images, like
After discussing it on IRC, how does this sound as a potential for a proposal:
A new tag called residential, where the value specifies the type of
residential, such as:
residential=apartment
residential=condo
residential=co-op
residential=single_room_occupancy
(these would be open for
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
The proposal/voting instructions at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Creating_a_proposal Are mostly about
inventing new tags.
What's the procedure for, and how can we document, a voting proposal for
reorganizing
Serge;
So you mean for an existing building outline tagged:
building=retail
You might recognize the residential separately:
building=retail
residential=apartment;condo
And start putting in nodes for each (ground level) business?
---
Note that a substantial number of high rises have three or
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Tac Tacelosky tac...@gmail.com wrote:
Has the idea of an image archive for OSM been brought up before? I
know about openstreetview.org, but as far as I can see, it's mostly
geotagged photos, there's not a lot of metadata there, nor integration
explicitly with
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Serge;
So you mean for an existing building outline tagged:
building=retail
You might recognize the residential separately:
building=retail
residential=apartment;condo
No.
building=retail doesn't make sense for a
My one year old Samsung Galaxy S3 has got the ability to geotag photos. If
there would be an app which can use such a geotagged photo and link it to
an OSM POI nearby, than I would go for that. Upload it under ODbL, no
copyright issues, Cost is a secondary thing which can be solved.
Cheers, Johan
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Johan C osm...@gmail.com wrote:
My one year old Samsung Galaxy S3 has got the ability to geotag photos. If
there would be an app which can use such a geotagged photo and link it to
an OSM POI nearby, than I would go for that. Upload it under ODbL, no
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.comwrote:
building=yes
and then add appropriate nodes, which in this case, would include
residential=[SOME VALUE]
Then we need many or all of:
- building=yes
- commercial=
- residential=
- hotel=
-
While we're on the subject of building tagging:
Prior to major building outline imports, OSM tended to contain mostly
important or notable building outlines. People might do a business
district, or the largest buildings in town, or the church, or zoo... but
few did every house and garden shed.
The City of Oakland's downtown:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.80321lon=-122.26395zoom=15layers=M
I think is an example of a map that with organic building outlines looks
quite pleasing. Add all the building outlines and you loose something...
___
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
building=yes
and then add appropriate nodes, which in this case, would include
residential=[SOME VALUE]
Then we need many or all of:
building=yes
commercial=
residential=
hotel=
amenity=parking
man_made=tower
maxgross_weight: All vehicles have a registered upper limit on
their allowable mass (when fully loaded). This is often known
as the Gross Weight, and it is found in the vehicle
documentation.
unfortunately it is more complicated because the amount of axis and
eventually the weight of trailers
Bryce, this is entirely a rendering issue. Map creators can (and always to
some degree do) select to display only features with certain tags, or that
have names, or are of a certain size, etc, depending on their audience and
what they're trying to show. For example, notable buildings for
Hi OSM tagging ML
I'm working some Mapping projects in Tsunami affected area, JAPAN.
In this week end, we will held a mapping party with local people.
Just I have two simple questions about url key.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url
(I know website key for Official web site.)
1) Can
Indeed, yet rendering issues have to work on a foundation of tagging. In
the old days of paper maps a cartographer made the decisions about what's
notable enough to show. Here we have to do it with tags (and consensus tags
at that).
To infer notability of building outlines, there are some
21 matches
Mail list logo
