Re: [Tagging] The not-shops: industrial, industry, or business

Hi, On 09/15/2014 07:43 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: Maybe this is running up on the limit of only rendering shop values with 100 instances? I think that many people think too much information science (how can I compress the most information into the smallest room) and too little cartography (how

Re: [Tagging] problem with bicycle=designated

I'm going to throw Dallas and Tulsa into that mix, too. On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com wrote: I myself, and I think more Dutch mappers, are using bicycle=designated (along with

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

Would it not be more straight forward to use junction=traffic_signal in Japan and only use highway=traffic_signal for the real lights ? Hm, I’m not sure. It could separete clearly the individual traffic signals from the traffic signal system/the covered area. The downside would be that we

Re: [Tagging] The not-shops: industrial, industry, or business

On 16 September 2014 07:32, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: I think that many people think too much information science (how can I compress the most information into the smallest room) and too little cartography (how can I make a map with a good user interface). You mean people tend

Re: [Tagging] The not-shops: industrial, industry, or business

Hi, On 09/16/2014 11:17 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: I think that many people think too much information science (how can I compress the most information into the smallest room) and too little cartography (how can I make a map with a good user interface). You mean people tend not to tag for the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

Am 16.09.2014 08:54, schrieb Lukas Sommer: Would it not be more straight forward to use junction=traffic_signal in Japan and only use highway=traffic_signal for the real lights ? Hm, I’m not sure. It could separete clearly the individual traffic signals from the traffic signal

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

The name belongs to the junction and not to the traffic_signal, or am I wrong ? In Japan, Hokkaido region, there is 4 traffic_signals on 1 junction. Each traffic_signals and 1 junction has different name. Indeed it is rare case. But I think we need Lukas's idea to support it. 2014-09-16 23:38

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote: Currently in OSM we use yet highway=traffic_signals for traffic signal names in Japan. And we use yet junction=yes for junction names in Korea. Sounds easy but... how do you tag a named junction with a traffic signal ?

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

how do you tag a named junction with a traffic signal ? highway=traffic_signal + junction=yes + name=* means that name is for the junction or for the traffic signals ? For the junction! For a named junction with a (not named) traffic signal: junction=yes + highway=traffic_signals. (Quite

[Tagging] How to tag a landmark clock

How should this clock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamberlain_Clock http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/187104810 be tagged? It's a notable landmark, but not a memorial. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a landmark clock

How about man_made=tower instead of historic=tower? You could also add start_date=1903 to show the age. On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: How should this clock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamberlain_Clock

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a landmark clock

Andy Mabbett wrote on 2014-09-16 22:10: How should this clock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamberlain_Clock http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/187104810 be tagged? It's a notable landmark, but not a memorial. It is already amenity=clock and has a name. You might add

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like the end goal is: - to have junction names in korea, regardless of if they are traffic lights, and the symbol used there doesn't imply traffic lights, just a junction. - In Japan, the old junction system evolved to be named traffic signals, and the

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

Am 15.09.2014 13:26, schrieb Dave F.: oneway=yes to access:backward=no oneway=yes is used sinde 10 years, IMHO there is no reason for a change! just my 2 cents, Michael. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

I map contraflow as dual carriageway, to avoid this issue. Both sides get oneway=yes, plus a full list of the modes allowed (psv, bicycle, etc). ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] The not-shops: industrial, industry, or business

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: A map icon is what, 32x32 pixels or so? A couple of millimeters on the screen. As long as you stick to 20 POI icons, you will be able to select icons that are instantly recognizable. Something with a film strip... must

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

This breaks routing where there is no dual carriageway. On Sep 16, 2014 7:01 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: I map contraflow as dual carriageway, to avoid this issue. Both sides get oneway=yes, plus a full list of the modes allowed (psv, bicycle, etc).