> The name belongs to the junction and not to the traffic_signal, or am I wrong ? In Japan, Hokkaido region, there is 4 traffic_signals on 1 junction. Each traffic_signals and 1 junction has different name.
Indeed it is rare case. But I think we need Lukas's idea to support it. 2014-09-16 23:38 GMT+09:00 fly <[email protected]>: > Am 16.09.2014 08:54, schrieb Lukas Sommer: > > > > > > Would it not be more straight forward to use junction=traffic_signal > in > > Japan and only use highway=traffic_signal for the real lights ? > > > > > > Hm, I’m not sure. It could separete clearly the individual traffic > > signals from the traffic signal system/the covered area. The downside > > would be that we introduce a new tag, and if you are a contributer and > > you want just add such a name to OSM, you have to deal with two > > different taggings: > > – highway=traffic_signals + name=* for simple cases (as currently) > > – junction=traffic_signal + name=* for the complex cases. > > Not sure, but it seems to be more complicate? > > Simply use junction=traffic_signal as addition to > highway=traffic_signal. In long terms, we will have two separate objects. > > The name belongs to the junction and not to the traffic_signal, or am I > wrong ? > > cu fly > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Satoshi IIDA mail: [email protected] twitter: @nyampire
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
