Looks fun, but how did you know you could stay there? Or did you just ask?
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jan van Bekkum
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015 08:10
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
To give you a better impression of
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 05:51 +, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
Dave, I think we are after different things. Your proposal focuses on
availability of services, while mine tells more about the relation
between the camper and the land owner:
Yes Jan, I agree. You have summed it up perfectly ! I'm
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 09:10 +0100, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
To give you a better impression of what I mean with non-designated
campsites I uploaded images of places we stayed at in Iran, Ethiopia,
Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi and Malawi. Have a look here and
enjoy. As you can see the quality
Title: Re: [Tagging] Loomio evaluation
Hi,
So, the conclusion of my Loomio test is that it does not let the
user choose which Google account it uses during account creation,
it uses the connected account and, despite the user cancels the
Login operation,
To give you a better impression of what I mean with non-designated
campsites I uploaded images of places we stayed at in Iran, Ethiopia,
Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi and Malawi. Have a look here
https://plus.google.com/photos/+JanvanBekkum/albums/6130450615283723697 and
enjoy. As you can see
On 24.03.2015 05:23, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Tagging list folks may wish to track or comment on:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:indoor
In my opinion, documenting a single indoor-related tag without a
complete indoor tagging schema makes no sense. We should wait until a
complete solution,
I better understand your requirements now, thanks for that.
I've looked at your site and pictures and feel we heave a fundamental problem.
Designated is fine and existing tags cover it but non_designated is harder to
agree to because of its temporary nature, I’m not sure OSM is the place for
Our blog can be found at www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl, video clips of our trips
at https://www.youtube.com/user/JanvanBekkum.
Many places we visited in Iran and east Africa for sure are no campgrounds
according to western standards, but if you need a place for the night your
standards adapt quickly. We
If it's there for years then it is a campsite no matter how it is advertised.
There is no point in separating designated and non-designated.
In my opinion those photos do not depict wild camping, you are camping in a car
park with some facilities available to the public. The is nothing
I am afraid we disagree then. After travelling around for almost 1.5 years
and attempting to tag over 200 sites where we stayed, my conclusion is that
it cannot be handled properly with the existing tags. That's why I made the
proposal.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:23 PM jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me
Non-designated is not necessarily temporary. Some hotels may offer the
service for many years, but it is not officially announced and not listed.
For overlanders this information is too important not to have it mapped
somehow.
Let me also give a few examples of wild camps where we stayed that
Hi Andre,
I am not sure what point you are trying to make.
You should say what you mean when you speak of e-mail (not being the
best tool).
If you mean that a plain mail server or list server is insufficient, one
can agree.
But if you say that the user shouldn't use e-mail, that is wrong.
1)
Hi,
it is mostly so that an area eg natural=bare_rock does not
end at the shoreline but extends some way under the water.
Current practice of having it end exactly on the shoreline
is both incorrect and a technical complication for mappers.
In many cases some of the underwater racks would be
On 23.03.2015 21:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-03-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de
mailto:o...@stephans-server.de:
The wiki describes operator=independent as he value has been used
when exact details of the operator are not known, other than that
they
On 26/03/2015 16:24, Richard Z. wrote:
has the rendering of the tidal areas been defined somehow?
No. tidal=yes is ignored.
how about underwater:natural=* and awash:natural=* ?
No doubt others will come up with alternatives. I will stand back and
wait for the usual suspects!
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:31:36PM +, Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 26/03/2015 12:35, Richard Z. wrote:
How do people think about it? Should we generalise that approach
or seek another solutions?
The way I have approached this is to map separate areas above and below the
natural=coastline
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 04:42:45PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 26.03.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
Current practice of having it end exactly on the shoreline
is both incorrect and a technical complication for mappers.
I believe for mappers
I can't find how I get this in Map_Features. Can anybody help?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com
wrote:
The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals and 2
rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved:
The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals and 2
rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_supply:schedule
Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,
*Jan van Bekkum*
www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jan
Examples of Wildcamping:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/487310@N25/pool/
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jonathan H
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015 13:17
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
If it's there for years then it is a
If the business sells small quantities of fuel (automotive or otherwise), but
not car parts, then in what sense does shop=car_parts apply? Fuel is not part
of the car.
On March 23, 2015 8:55:57 AM CDT, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:
On 23.03.2015 11:02, Dave Swarthout wrote:
An
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 12:36 +, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
Non-designated is not necessarily temporary. Some hotels may offer the
service for many years, but it is not officially announced and not
listed. For overlanders this information is too important not to have
it mapped somehow.
I still
On 27/03/2015 9:18 AM, David Bannon wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 12:36 +, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
Non-designated is not necessarily temporary. Some hotels may offer the
service for many years, but it is not officially announced and not
listed. For overlanders this information is too important
Am 26.03.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
Current practice of having it end exactly on the shoreline
is both incorrect and a technical complication for mappers.
I believe for mappers it is the easiest solution, not a technical complication.
It is typically very
As well. If you look in the original proposal you find different categories
of sites in this groups. It can be the beauty of the place, security,
availability of some amenities.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:27 PM jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote:
Those look fantastic, would you want to tag those as
Those look fantastic, would you want to tag those as Wildcamping?
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jan van Bekkum
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015 14:11
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Fortunately we had those as well:
On 26/03/2015 12:35, Richard Z. wrote:
How do people think about it? Should we generalise that approach
or seek another solutions?
The way I have approached this is to map separate areas above and below
the natural=coastline way add the tag tidal=yes on the below HW area.
Should we use
Fortunately we had those as well:
https://plus.google.com/photos/111767853767854777895/albums/6130545866082686641
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
28 matches
Mail list logo
