On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 05:51 +0000, Jan van Bekkum wrote: > Dave, I think we are after different things. Your proposal focuses on > availability of services, while mine tells more about the relation > between the camper and the land owner:
Yes Jan, I agree. You have summed it up perfectly ! I'm afraid I think my version is, perhaps, what the end user is more interested in. Further, can we expect the mapper to be able determine and express the relationship between camper and land owner. We should map what we see. Hey, where is this link John mentioned to your rig ? David > * Designated: permission to camp, most likely the place is still > there tomorrow, service offering (whatever it is) is stable, > publicly announced as campground; > * Non-designated: permission to camp, policy and services may > change overnight, not publicly announced as campground (no > signs, no listings); > * Wild: no permission to camp (but no prohibition either), > sometimes a policy, situation may change overnight, not > announced. > Regards, > > > Jan > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
