On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
To leave a tag that describes it as a pub (when it is not) then add
another tag that says it is not a pub is plain daft.
+1
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:20:10 -0700
Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing ... and not
disused=yes into every cartocss rule!
Fortunately, we will not have to do that in OpenStreetMap Carto, as
we will
On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
So ALL shops should all be together under shops= (even though all shops are
in fact amenities too). Same for offices.
This reduces the amenity= values to those that are not offices nor shops.
I think the easiest way to
Take a look at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
--K
On 26 August 2015 at 13:10, serpens-...@gmx.de wrote:
What is the best way to bring this on a formal way to an official tag?
Is wiki:Proposed_features the right place (it is partly about changing
existing tags not only
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:49:07PM +0100, Chris Hill wrote:
On 24/08/15 18:56, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi Mateusz,
It seems this tag is a combination of waterway=canal and disused=yes.
I'm not so in favor of such value (derelict_canal). There are two
different information in one value.
Wednesday 26 August 2015 21:04:47, Andrew Errington:
Curiously, the disadvantages of disused=yes seem rather contrived,
and not really likely, whereas the disadvantages of disused:*=* seem
quite genuine. Not to mention that disused=yes is simpler, and very
obvious to a human reader.
You're
What is the best way to bring this on a formal way to an official tag?
Is wiki:Proposed_features the right place (it is partly about changing existing
tags not only about new tags)? Where takes a vote place about this?
Best
Serpens
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. August 2015 um 14:21 Uhr
Von:
On 26/08/2015, Richard ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:23:10PM +1000, Warin wrote:
On 26/08/2015 8:20 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing ... and not disused=yes
into every cartocss rule!
Wednesday 26 August 2015 12:51:22, Dave F.:
Sub tags such as disused=yes have always been the way to describe
additional attributes of an entity. It's even the syntax used by XML:
you collect all 'waterway=canal' items then manipulate that selection
set. If programmers don't notice then,
On 26/08/2015 12:51, Dave F. wrote:
Sub tags such as disused=yes have always been the way to describe
additional attributes of an entity. It's even the syntax used by XML:
you collect all 'waterway=canal' items then manipulate that selection
set. If programmers don't notice then, quite
On 25/08/2015 23:20, Paul Norman wrote:
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing ... and not
disused=yes into every cartocss rule!
Fortunately, we will not have to do that in OpenStreetMap Carto, as we
will not be supporting the style of
On 24/08/2015 21:49, Chris Hill wrote:
On 24/08/15 18:56, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi Mateusz,
It seems this tag is a combination of waterway=canal and disused=yes.
I'm not so in favor of such value (derelict_canal). There are two
different information in one value.
I think that
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:23:10PM +1000, Warin wrote:
On 26/08/2015 8:20 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing ... and not disused=yes
into every cartocss rule!
Fortunately, we will not have to do that in
On 26/08/2015 13:44, Dave F. wrote:
On 25/08/2015 23:20, Paul Norman wrote:
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing ... and not
disused=yes into every cartocss rule!
Fortunately, we will not have to do that in OpenStreetMap Carto, as
we will
On 26/08/2015 13:34, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 26/08/2015 12:51, Dave F. wrote:
Sub tags such as disused=yes have always been the way to describe
additional attributes of an entity. It's even the syntax used by XML:
you collect all 'waterway=canal' items then manipulate that selection
set. If
On 26/08/15 13:44, Dave F. wrote:
A pub that's closed down it's still recognisable as a pub. It's not a
park bench or a multi-storey car park. It's just closed. This should
be described in sub tags.
No, a pub that is closed is simply not open for business until it
reopens the next day. A
On 8/26/15 8:55 AM, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 26/08/2015 13:44, Dave F. wrote:
On 25/08/2015 23:20, Paul Norman wrote:
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing ... and not
disused=yes into every cartocss rule!
Fortunately, we will not have to
17 matches
Mail list logo
