On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> So maybe we should not use brand=* on the "shop" itself, but something like
> product:car:brands=BMW;Mini to refer to the products, NOT to the external
> appearance of the shop. After all, we are not listing the
On 8/03/2016 10:25 AM, Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi,
Am 07.03.2016 um 08:56 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
It is possible that some supermarkets would make their list of products
available electronically and thus provide an incentive for a clever
hacker to simply convert that to OSM. Once we say we
Hi,
Am 07.03.2016 um 08:56 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> It is possible that some supermarkets would make their list of products
> available electronically and thus provide an incentive for a clever
> hacker to simply convert that to OSM. Once we say we accept a list of
> products for a supermarket,
If you scroll down you will notice that there was never a sloped_kerb
proposal as the page is actually the proposal for amenity=sloped_curb
which was marked as inactive here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/sloped_kerb=670959
(which is understandable given that
Today:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/sloped_kerb=1279361=1215962
On 7 March 2016 at 19:48, Simon Poole wrote:
> Recently I believe in this case was 2010 .
>
> Simon
>
> Am 07.03.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Andy Mabbett:
>> On 2 March 2016 at
Marc,
You assert that it doesn't exist in Belgium. It most definitely does
exist elsewhere though; repeating your assertion is not going to get
closer to a conclusion. In fact, as it exists for caravans, campers and
bicycles, it would be advantageous to have a uniform tagging model for
all these
Recently I believe in this case was 2010 .
Simon
Am 07.03.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> On 2 March 2016 at 16:42, Simon Poole wrote:
>> While the abandoned proposal seems to be more complete and I can't say
>> anything about the other variant because of the lacking
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Even if this happens in Belgium, it is clear that we have to accommodate
> multi-brand dealerships in our tagging scheme because it most definitely
> does occur elsewhere.
From what I understood from Frederik's mail, he
On 2 March 2016 at 16:42, Simon Poole wrote:
> While the abandoned proposal seems to be more complete and I can't say
> anything about the other variant because of the lacking documentation, I
> don't really care either way, it would simply make easier if we could
> come to some
Even if this happens in Belgium, it is clear that we have to accommodate
multi-brand dealerships in our tagging scheme because it most definitely
does occur elsewhere.
I may be wrong, but I thought that the sort of dealership restrictions
you mention were illegal these days, unless it can be
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Have to? Is there some law or regulation in Belgium?
I think it's required by BMW and VW/Audi. (or the company that does
the imports for the brand into Belgium).
I believe they even can't sell BMW motorcycles from the
> Op 7 mrt. 2016, om 08:56 heeft Frederik Ramm het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Thankfully, this is hypothetical because we won't do it. OSM is a geo
> database and not a sales directory.
+1
That’s exactly how I see it.
Never, ever would OSM be able to support such a
Have to? Is there some law or regulation in Belgium? Or is it a choice
of the brands themselves? My BMW dealer (in NL) also does Mini, from the
same building, at the same desk (for maintenance anyway). Next door is a
dealer for Rolls-Royce, TVR, McClaren, Lexus, Lamborghini and others all
in one
farm:pick_your_own=yes makes most sense to me. I used the tag for the
second time in the whole database [1]. Is this really all we have of these
things, or are there some other proposititions in use?
[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397702013
2016-02-14 2:35 GMT+01:00 Greg Troxel
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Putting brand=X on a shop would indicate the branding of the shop, not
> necessarily the brands which are sold within. These days (certainly in the
> 4-wheeled world) we are seeing less single-branded shops/showrooms and
On 2016-03-07 12:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2016-03-07 7:50 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
>> For example at present a mapper adding tags to a sewing shop that sells
>> sewing machines can have
>>
>> paff=yes... that makes no sense unless you know Paff make sewing
>>
2016-03-07 7:50 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> For example at present a mapper adding tags to a sewing shop that sells
> sewing machines can have
>
> paff=yes... that makes no sense unless you know Paff make sewing
> machines.
>
> gutenberg=yes ... makes no sense unless you know
On 7/03/2016 8:25 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
How about limiting the list to product categories, according to an
agreed taxonomy? Particularly categories which help to distinguish one
shop from another. For example supermarkets might be expected to sell
frozen food, but occasionally they might
How about limiting the list to product categories, according to an
agreed taxonomy? Particularly categories which help to distinguish one
shop from another. For example supermarkets might be expected to sell
frozen food, but occasionally they might not. So frozen food would be a
candidate for a
On 7/03/2016 6:56 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/2016 07:54 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Just imagine what would happen if
someone took it upon them to actually list all the products sold at a
supermarket. And update that once a week.
I see no problem with that except that anybody
20 matches
Mail list logo