On 06/07/19 02:28, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
On 7/5/2019 10:56 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most
On 05/07/19 19:57, Mariusz wrote:
On 05.07.2019 07:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I've removed this statement from the page because it leads to
ambiguous data and directly contradicts the One feature per one
element rule
[Examples of bad situations:] "An area object representing a
single-use
On 05/07/19 19:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
3 Jul 2019, 12:52 by o...@westnordost.de:
1.1 At the examples: for max empty weight, I propose the key
maxemptyweight. It suggests itself.
Added, with link back to this post
Here that would be called "maximum Tare weight". In the UK?
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:33 PM bkil wrote:
> Be my guest:
> intermittent=yes
> ephemeral=yes
> building=no
> permanent=no
> movable=yes
> stationary=no
> caravan=yes
> mount=trailer
> support=wheels
> foundation=no
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_restaurant
>
On Friday, 5 July 2019, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
> On 7/5/2019 3:08 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> > I read joost's comment as "The operator of this map object is a
> > specific private citizen"
> > not as a redefinition of "operator."
> >
> Hah, probably. Regardless, I do think that Les Incroyables
>
On 05.07.19 11:57, Mariusz wrote:
> On 05.07.2019 07:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>> [Examples of bad situations:] "An area object representing a
>> single-use building with a point object inside it. Move the tags to
>> the area object and delete the point."
>
> This is common and widly accepted
On 7/5/2019 3:08 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
I read joost's comment as "The operator of this map object is a
specific private citizen"
not as a redefinition of "operator."
Hah, probably. Regardless, I do think that Les Incroyables
Comestibles/Incredible Edibles fits better under the brand key, or
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 19:40, Jmapb via Tagging
wrote:
> On 7/5/2019 12:18 PM, joost schouppe wrote:
>
> > Operator is actually "a specific private citizen"
>
> What's the source of this definition? On the English wiki, operator is
> "a company, corporation, person or any other entity who is
On 7/5/2019 12:18 PM, joost schouppe wrote:
Operator is actually "a specific private citizen"
What's the source of this definition? On the English wiki, operator is
"a company, corporation, person or any other entity who is directly in
charge of the current operation of a map object."
J
On 7/5/2019 10:56 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
This is
Thanks for the help!
I wouldn't want to lose the "Les Incroyables Comestibles" info, so as to be
able to group them by project. But maybe brand=* is the better tag for
that. Operator is actually "a specific private citizen", so that'd be
operator:type=private or maybe community if it is actually
On 7/4/2019 11:17 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
We've also had problems with features tagged "tourism=camp_site" or
"landuse=meadow" plus "barrier=hedge" or "barrier=wall". Is the
barrier supposed to be an area or a linear feature in this case?
I can see the confusion here, but I think this rule
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
There might be times when there is "bbq=yes" and
On 7/5/2019 2:16 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
So, what's a better term for a test prep centre, cramp school, or
tutoring office? There the rarely used tag office=tutoring, but that
doesn't quite cover a place like Kaplan or Kumon -
https://au.kumonglobal.com/ - https://www.kaptest.com/
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 10:42, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
I added it to
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/street_vendor%3Dyes=1874089=1871846
> but I still prefer street_vendor
>
I found out yesterday there are also mobile post offices. I was
surprised. Comes
Le 03.07.19 à 17:17, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit :
> bbq:grills=yes/no/1+
or device=* (already approved tag do describe the number
of same devices) ?
> bbq:bring_own=yes/no
or equiped=yes/no : the bbq is always there or it's an allowed
but not-equiped area and you need to bring your own ?
The other major use booking=* with *!=booking.com concerns trains
in or passing through France, I talked about it on talk-fr and transport
(the French-speaking transit mailing).
no one has so far opposed to move those in reservation=*,
but I will wait a few more days before modifying these
The issue I see with prep school is that it can be very easily confused with a
Preparatory School, commonly referred to as a Prep School. I believe the term
is used in both British and American English, i.e. Prepy.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Friday, 5 July 2019, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I followed a
School=education is extraneous as a school implies an educational
institution. If you looked at education reform proposal, you would see
education=school. Cram schools are sufficiently different than academic
schools that amenity=school will not fit.
Yours, faithfully
Erkin Alp
Le 05.07.19 à 10:53, 石野貴之 a écrit :
> My proposal is the following:
> 1. Use a well-documented tag for the main tag. I think
> office=educational_institution would be the best, but
office=* is for office related stuff
the place where the staff do "office activities" can get an office=*
But i
On 05.07.2019 07:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I've removed this statement from the page because it leads to
ambiguous data and directly contradicts the One feature per one
element rule
[Examples of bad situations:] "An area object representing a
single-use building with a point object inside it.
1 Jul 2019, 18:41 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>
> equivalent of a mobile shop, and I'm not even sure there is one.
>
> Mobile=yes|no has the problem of confusion with cell phones.
>
> BTW, there's a fast food outlet near me set up in a shipping container at the
> side of a road.
> Theoretically
3 Jul 2019, 12:52 by o...@westnordost.de:
> 1.1 At the examples: for max empty weight, I propose the key maxemptyweight.
> It suggests itself.
>
Added, with link back to this post
> 1.2 At the examples: Conditionals should maybe better be catch-all, so i.e.
> axles>=3 instead of axles=3
>
Le 03.07.19 à 03:10, brad a écrit :
> Thoughts?
4) use smoothness if it suits your needs better
without changing the meaning of a tag used elsewhere in your region
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Le 03.07.19 à 03:10, brad a écrit :
> Thoughts?
4) use smoothness if it suits your needs better
without changing the meaning of a tag used elsewhere in your region
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hello.
Tagging schemes for cram schools and tutorial centers have been discussed
very often,
but none of the discussion got to the solid conclusion.
I am strongly concerned about the situation, and requested for comments on
my diary.
ML:
I believe smoothness=* is very important in dry areas, including most
of the western USA in summertime (when most people visit remote areas
on track roads).
But a road that is very smooth, dry clay in summer, for example an
unimproved track across a dry lakebed, will become impassible mud
after a
I followed a link from amenity=school to amenity=prep_school, which
was only as stub with the text "Tutorial schools" and
description="Tutor school".
Taghistory shows it has been used since 2012, slowly increasing to a
few hundred uses since 2018, but had no wiki page still March 2019.
However,
28 matches
Mail list logo
