Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

On 5/6/20 10:46 am, Greg Troxel wrote: Sure. I tend to think that if something is semantically sensible and can be represented, it's good to tag it, and then rendering is another story. I think pretty much everyone agrees that landuse=residential and natural=wood are both sensible to represent

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

On 3/6/20 7:22 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: Jun 2, 2020, 20:16 by stevea...@softworkers.com: "this IS residential landuse." (Not COULD BE, but IS). Yes, this land might be "natural" now, including being "treed," but I could still build a patio and bbq there after perha

Re: [Tagging] Overlapping naturals

On 5/6/20 10:06 pm, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: And you are missing (1) word "mainly" (2) "Note: Two values of landuse=* may be view as not strictly land use.    These are landuse=grass and landuse=forest. Please refer to the pages    of these for more information." As usua

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

On 6/6/20 8:02 am, Volker Schmidt wrote: I need to reopen this thread.  I do object strongly to the invitation to remove the razed/dismantled-railway tag in the case of railway tracks have been replaced by roads with the same geometry. To the contrary this is one of the more fortunate cases w

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

From: Volker Schmidt  I do object strongly to the invitation to remove the razed/dismantled-railway tag in the case of railway tracks have been replaced by roads with the same geometry. To the contrary this is one of the more fortunate cases where the original route has been conserved, and it is ea

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

I need to reopen this thread. We have not arrived at a consensus so far in this talk, Nevertheless the wiki page Demolished_Railway was completely rewritten on 07:17, 27 May 2020 by Mateusz Konieczny

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Lines management - Voting

Hi all, This little reminder is about the voting stage of Line management proposal which ends tomorrow evening. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lines_management 20 people already took time to give their opinion, which is comparable to the previous Line attachment proposal la

Re: [Tagging] Adding mapillary tags to every building

Hi Mateusz, On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 06:13:12PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > Jun 4, 2020, 16:00 by vinc...@bergeot.org: > > > Le 04/06/2020 à 15:49, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit : > > > >> You have right to use your own images, AFAIK there is also a special > >> permiss

Re: [Tagging] Adding mapillary tags to every building

Following is more on topic than may be expected - OSM Wiki is illustrated by images from Wikimedia Commons, and thanks for all people who uploaded things there. Jun 5, 2020, 09:14 by jan...@gmail.com: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020, 16:48 European Water Project <> > europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> > wrot

Re: [Tagging] Overlapping naturals

And you are missing (1) word "mainly" (2) "Note: Two values of landuse=* may be view as not strictly land use.    These are landuse=grass and landuse=forest. Please refer to the pages    of these for more information." present on this page. Jun 5, 2020, 10:49 by ravilac...@gmail.com: >

Re: [Tagging] Overlapping naturals

I think you are missing one point here, and that's the one we have in the landuse key wikipage: "Mainly used to describe the primary use of land by humans." If 2 or more uses, we should select the main one. For your example, you might add the forest with a landcover tag, or, if the main use o

Re: [Tagging] Adding mapillary tags to every building

Hi Janko, Thank you .. it is time to reduce our global reliance on single-use plastic ! We are all ingesting 5 grams each week .. in our fish, vegetables, meat, and water etc ... The people at Mapillary with whom I spoke see huge value in single-snap images - with many possible application

Re: [Tagging] Adding mapillary tags to every building

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020, 16:48 European Water Project < europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> wrote: > While all three of them have shown enthusiasm, single-snap images are just > not a priority at this point for Mapillary. > This is interesting. Did they say that they don't prefer single-snap images in th