Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Green alley

2020-08-16 Thread - -
***Ops: this feature is not currently subject to a vote. Wrong subject, sorry all. Current status is RFC.*** Thank you for your welcome. Is it just about signposted and officially recognized places? > Or is it supposed to be similar to tree_lined tag. > They are indeed signposted and officially

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Yves
station:type is still available then. Yves Le 17 août 2020 01:52:12 GMT+02:00, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > >sent from a phone > >> On 17. Aug 2020, at 00:25, Colin Smale wrote: >> >> Other attributes like the presence of the drive motors, ticket sales etc are >> not determinants of

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 17. Aug 2020, at 00:25, Colin Smale wrote: > > Other attributes like the presence of the drive motors, ticket sales etc are > not determinants of the "valley" vs "mountain" labels. I have followed this discussion, my comment was that there may well be other types of

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Colin Smale
On 2020-08-17 00:12, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > sent from a phone > >> On 16. Aug 2020, at 15:26, dktue wrote: > >> Ok, then I'm going to edit the wiki [1] now. >> >> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aerialway=station > > sorry for this late comment, but maybe it would be

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone >> On 16. Aug 2020, at 15:26, dktue wrote: >  Ok, then I'm going to edit the wiki [1] now. > > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aerialway=station > sorry for this late comment, but maybe it would be better to use station:position=top/mid (or middle) / bottom

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 16. Aug 2020, at 13:55, Colin Smale wrote: > > You can't have a mid terminal, by definition. right, this is also something that always bothered me with our way of tagging ferry stations. Cheers Martin ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread dktue
Ok, then I'm going to edit the wiki [1] now. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aerialway=station Am 16.08.2020 um 15:07 schrieb Yves: I derived, not copied :-) Go on with proposed top, mid & bottom, Dktue. I tried to be more specific and imply a meaning that is beyond 'the station

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Yves
I derived, not copied :-) Go on with proposed top, mid & bottom, Dktue. I tried to be more specific and imply a meaning that is beyond 'the station at the top of the aerialway' because us dealing with a geo database, it's a bit clumsy to tag this, and I fear the proposal will attract some

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread dktue
So that would leave us with     aerialway:station={bottom,mid,top}? Am 16.08.2020 um 13:53 schrieb Colin Smale: Nope You can't have a mid terminal, by definition. And as "terminal" is used with similar semantics to "station" here, if you start with aerialway:station you don't need to

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Colin Smale
Nope You can't have a mid terminal, by definition. And as "terminal" is used with similar semantics to "station" here, if you start with aerialway:station you don't need to include "terminal" or "station" in the value as well. That web page doesn't refer at all to the "top station" or the

[Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Werner . Haag
I agree, a good proposal and compromise, Serves the requirement for more intuitive words about altitude (top instead of head), and also does not use critical geographic terms like mountain or valley station. "dktue" schrieb am 16.08.2020 11:11:44: > Von: "dktue" > An: tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] tourism=caravan_site versus tourism=camp_site: camping with a tent

2020-08-16 Thread Hidde Wieringa
Indeed. It is interesting to see that caravan_site is rendered conditionally in OpenCampingMap (only when further tags like tents tents, caravans, private, groups_only, etc. are given). Camp_sites are always rendered as far as I can find [1] [2]. Dalaas caravan_site is not rendered [3] [4],

Re: [Tagging] bridge:name and tunnel:name

2020-08-16 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Aug 15, 2020, 23:48 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 15. Aug 2020, at 17:33, Arne Johannessen wrote: >> >> Therefore, the tunnel's name is the primary name for that particular way, >> and thus belongs into the name=* tag. >> >> The full name tagging for a road

Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread dktue
Am 15.08.2020 um 18:25 schrieb Yves: Had a look at http://www.skilifts.org/old/glossary.htm, came up with : Aerialway:station=top_terminal, mid_terminal, bottom_terminal I'd be totally fine with that aswell. ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Green alley

2020-08-16 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Thanks for posting on mailing list! Is it just about signposted and officially recognized places? Or is it supposed to be similar to tree_lined tag. How mapper is supposed to distinguish where it is done by local residents and one where it is done by city? Why it is using alley=green_alley if

Re: [Tagging] tourism=caravan_site versus tourism=camp_site: camping with a tent

2020-08-16 Thread Warin
On 15/8/20 4:49 am, Hidde Wieringa wrote: Good day, I am having trouble with the tourism tags caravan_site and camp_site, specifically for the use case of finding a place to camp with a tent (so not a caravan or a camper van). My goal is to differentiate the two tags. Both tags allow