Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

Le 13.11.22 à 23:51, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit : The standard for a proposal, which purports to change tagging standards that affect *the entire community*, should be to advertise it as widely as possible. of course, and the current proposal is not needed to "to advertise it as widely

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

Le 13.11.22 à 20:40, Cartographer10 via Tagging a écrit : There are quite some people discouraged by the mailing list requirement You regularly use this argument but it makes no sense. So there would be people motivated enough to make a proposal but whose only blocking factor is to post 2

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

Thanks for the reminder. I indeed forgot to update the title after i changed the proposal. Will do that soon. > But before we get that far, I recommend that the proposal's title be adjusted > slightly. The current title implies that discussions would start "moving" to > the new forums, which

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

Vào lúc 14:51 2022-11-13, Brian M. Sperlongano đã viết: You're using the wrong metric.  The standard for a proposal, which purports to change tagging standards that affect *the entire community*, should be to advertise it as widely as possible.  With the new forums picking up interest and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

You're using the wrong metric. The standard for a proposal, which purports to change tagging standards that affect *the entire community*, should be to advertise it as widely as possible. With the new forums picking up interest and activity, it is entirely appropriate to say to a proposer

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 01:07, Cartographer10 via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > I hope that the current proposal will for everybody. > It possibly will be one day, but at the moment, no, I don't think that we're yet ready to say "You *have* to post there". I recently started a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Street parking revision

Hello everybody, I would like to remind you of the ongoing discussion process on the street parking revision proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/street_parking_revision Since this proposal aims to deprecate an existing tagging schema and replace it with a new

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

I did actually do something with the feedback. Quite some people advised to require posting on both platforms. The proposal now requires that.  However, the first vote did show that quite some people actually support including the forum in the proposal process. There are quite some people

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

Le 13.11.22 à 16:01, Cartographer10 via Tagging a écrit : I didn't receive any feedback on my updated proposal. If you have any, please share it here I have the impression that you have received a lot of it but you simply refuse to listen to it and go on forcing it until it finally passes.

Re: [Tagging] amentiy=donation_centre?

Vào lúc 19:02 2022-11-12, Graeme Fitzpatrick đã viết: On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 at 10:37, António Madeira > wrote: I don't know of any charity which buys items to then resell or distribute them, although that can happen in some obscure situation. There's

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

It has been discussed with the forum admin here:  https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/moving-to-the-new-forum-for-proposals-and-voting/2940/70?u=cartographer10 He recommends to first start in the tagging sub community. If the volumes get really high, we can request a subcommunity. You can also

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

I support the idea that proposals be posted to both the mailing list and the community forums. Over time we can assess whether one or the other is better. One thing I think is missing is that I would like to see proposals posted to a dedicated space in the forums that can be subscribed to, that

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

I didn't receive any feedback on my updated proposal. If you have any, please share it here. I hope that the current proposal will for everybody. Kind regards, Vincent 6 nov. 2022 09:03 van tagging_at_openstreetmap_org_seblajk...@simplelogin.co: > I have updated the proposal a few days back

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Manufacturer and Model

Nice proposal, thank you. I'll get to read it more thoroughly later. On 13/11/22 11:39, Daniele Santini wrote: Voting has started for the proposal "Manufacturer and Model": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Manufacturer_and_Model . The goal is to clarify the keys and the

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Manufacturer and Model

Voting has started for the proposal "Manufacturer and Model": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Manufacturer_and_Model . The goal is to clarify the keys and the documentation for tagging the manufacturer and model of elements on the map. Cheers -- Daniele Santini

Re: [Tagging] Relations of type=site + tourism=camp_site

Nov 12, 2022, 14:22 by li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de: > Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > >> So >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13012999#map=19/49.12702/10.86422 >> site relation is including nearby restaurant and shop? >> > > Right! > >> That are not actually part of camp site?