Re: [Tagging] Tagging speed camera *zones*

> The UK has many "average speed" zones, which would have the same problem. We've got average speed zones down here, with signage warning of them and fixed, highly visible camera positions. As the cameras are fixed and permanent, the enforcement relation fits the description perfectly well

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I can't comment whether this is "proper" usage or not, but I can illustrate how I've personally tagged lanes at freeway exits: Take, for example, this freeway interchange close to where I grew up (note: left-hand drive): https://goo.gl/maps/5eF35SVed452 There's no lane markings to indicate

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

On 14 July 2016 at 12:24, Bjoern Hassler wrote: > (1) both "line" and "tube" are in use to designate lines (e.g. > "Piccaddilly;Bakerloo"). Only one of them tends to be filled. I assume this > should all be "line"? I'd actually tag this as the name=* of the route_master

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

On 13 July 2016 at 12:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > +1. Some people also add a third relation (route master) to group the two > (plus eventual variants). This should be considered mandatory. --K ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] number of bollards in a line

> I wonder if we should define a special key such as bollard_count=12 (used > 3x) > or keep it generic as count=12 (used 1000x, 121x in combination with > barrier)? As much as I'm in favour of the generic count=*, there could be cases where it is not clear what count=* is referring to. On the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - learner driver

On 28 June 2016 at 13:52, Michael Tsang wrote: > > I agree on the point that mode:learner_driver=* is better, but, however, isn't > it common sense that learners are not allowed on motorways? Can you give me > some regions where learners are, by default, allowed on motorways?

Re: [Tagging] Please don't think name_1 tags are errors.

Whichever iD developer thought that adding random _N suffixes was a good idea deserves to be taken out back and shot. While handling newbie mistakes (and teaching them the correct way of doing things) is most certainly encouraged, doing it in such a way that pollutes tagging is totally

[Tagging] Tagging dangerous intersections

Hi, I recently passed through an intersection in a particularly dodgy part of town that actually had warning signs up, warning motorists that said intersection is a hotspot for "smash and grab" robberies. (If anyone is interested, it's on Google Streetview too: https://goo.gl/maps/kYkdMR9Kmpk)

Re: [Tagging] new access value

I'm of the opinion that "visitors" is indeed the best translation to what you have described. --K -Original Message- From: Friedrich Volkmann [mailto:b...@volki.at] Sent: Monday, 05 October 2015 12:02 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject:

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting Extension - Dynamic maxspeed

Hi all, Voting on the dynamic maxspeed proposal ended a few days ago, and I've gone through the results: yes=6, no=2. (Real life got in the way of my ability to do so earlier). In my opinion, even while there is an overwhelming majority leaning towards approval, not enough votes have been cast

Re: [Tagging] New proposal: Obligatory tagging of oneway on motorway_link

> Though I agree in principle with the idea of making tagging more > explicit, how big of a practical concern is this? i.e. how many times in > the real world is motorway_link a two-way road? While I agree such a case is rare, it is possible. See: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68433570 --

Re: [Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

Take a look at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process --K On 26 August 2015 at 13:10, serpens-...@gmx.de wrote: What is the best way to bring this on a formal way to an official tag? Is wiki:Proposed_features the right place (it is partly about changing existing tags not only

Re: [Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

Ah, OK. That makes more sense then. (: --K On 25 August 2015 at 17:15, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote: On Tuesday 2015-08-25 16:42 +0200, serpens-...@gmx.de wrote: The destination country is not always identical with addr:country – see for example the embassy of Ethiopia in

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - maxspeed:variable=*

Hello, A while ago, I came across the maxspeed:variable=* tag, to specify if a highway's maximum speed could be further reduced using dynamic speed indication. This was proposed back in 2012 as an alternative to maxspeed=signals; the main rationale being that maxspeed=signals does not convey any

Re: [Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

Hi, While I've never tagged any form of diplomatic institution, I agree with the rationale behind your proposal. I do have some suggestions around implementation details. I would argue that you wouldn't need tags specifying what country the diplomatic institution is physically located in: one