Hi!
Daniel, from Spain.
Thank you very much for your comments. I didn't know much about "dehesas"
and I'm learning by reading your comments on this mailing list and on the
wiki [1]. (I also didn't know the tag "landuse=meadow_orchard".
Interesting!)
A "dehesa" is not a "landuse=farmland". Nor
+1
Wolfgang Zenker wrote
> * Iago Casabiell
> iagocasabiell@
> [190907 18:29]:
>> Exactly, so how do we solve this?
>
> Very simple: By letting the people tag it that live there and have local
> knowledge. They know what the place is called locally, and that usually
> is based on a complex
Hi,
Joseph Eisenberg wrote
> I suppose access=private isn’t wrong, but it seems incomplete: many
> government offices do not legally exclude the public, but also do not
> offer public services. For example, the offices of members of the American
> legislature are clearly not public, but anyone
Good job!
Thank you, Leif.
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Sorry,
Obviusly, «amenity=community_centre» (my mistake).
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi, Morten.
Where I live (Málaga, Spain), there is (or was) a bicycle workshop with
similar characteristics. Its creator defined it as a socio-cultural bicycle
workshop. You could take your bike there for repair. I had tools and
everything you might need. In addition, more experienced people
Hi,
Why not "access=private"?
Examples from the wiki [1]:
"amenity=parking" + "access=private" for private parking, such as company
employees.
"leisure=swimming_pool" + "access=private" for a swimming pool in a private
backyard.
"leisure=playground" + "access=private" for a playground in a
Hi, Martin.
dieterdreist wrote
> the question is also how suitable a generic stadium would be for
> bullfighting.
Um, I don't think anyone in Spain would try to adapt a generic stadium as a
bullring. But not because it's difficult, but because bullfights are not as
popular as football, for
Hi,
Jmapb wrote
> I don't know if there's a distinct style of traditional bullring
> architecture, but if there is, then building=bullring makes sense for
> those.
Not much difference. For example, in Spain, tennis matches are played in
bullrings. They are suitable for other types of sports.
dieterdreist wrote
> I would also prefer either building=bullring or maybe we need a stadium=*
> tag.
Yes, my first idea was to use a "stadium" subtag. This solution is barely
used, so I dismissed the idea.
I preferred "building=stadium" + "stadium=bullring" to "building=bullring"
if some of
Thank you, Martin.
I think it's the right thing to do, too.
I have asked the OSM community in Spain and it seems that some mapper prefer
"building=bullring" instead of "building=stadium". I think the right tag is
"building=stadium" because we use this tag for stadiums, no matter what type
of
El 31/7/19 a las 19:37, Jmapb escribió:
On 7/31/2019 1:19 PM, dcapillae wrote:
leisure=stadium
sport=bullfighting (in use)
Hi Daniel -- definitely this one: leisure=stadium + sport=bullfighting.
You might also want to use the building=stadium tag, if the stadium
occupies the entire building
Hi,
I would like to ask you about the best tagging for a bullring:
leisure=stadium
stadium=bullring
or
leisure=stadium
stadium=bull_ring
or
leisure=stadium
sport=bullfighting (in use)
I haven't considered "leisure=bullring". Some mappers use this tag to
map bullrings, but I think it's
13 matches
Mail list logo
