kept in an opt in basis in case people don't want
their names shown)
On 3/15/19 5:54 PM, seirra blake wrote:
key: almost tagging should occur here | data may be reused in parent |
data may be reused in parent and any 'adjacent' (with the same letter)
parent
/public transport network
hmm maybe. version 4 will include a detailed example, once that is
available feel free what would be missing for that purpose
On 3/15/19 7:19 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
maybe we can have roles to state whether the tags of the referenced object
should apply to the relation or if only the
hmm... I'm not quite sure on what would be best. I do see your point in
the case of just splitting very long ways there, they would not be
'shared' at all. to the best of my knowledge type=* is intended to
exclusively define the relation. in all circumstances that we have
discussed, it still
as I'm concerned, the sequence of stops is the 'signature'
defining each variation in itinerary.
Polyglot
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:55 PM seirra blake
mailto:sophietheopos...@yandex.com>> wrote:
key: almost tagging should occur here | data may be reused in
parent | data may be
)
On 3/15/19 2:37 PM, seirra blake wrote:
I can see *a lot* of shared routes in my area because most of the
buses heavily use a star topography (everything must take you to a
central station) as opposed to a hybrid mesh/star topography
(everywhere has access to a service to a central station
.
You would need to allow all types of route relations to contain ways
and shared segment relations.
I'm not sure if you would need any special tag to indicate it's
shared. If it's used more than once, it's shared, right?
Fr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 15 mrt. 2019 om 15:38 schreef seirra blake
to make sure it's clear what I
meant. if you feel an example would help somewhat I'll make one too; it
could be useful to see how renderers handle it now. let me know if you'd
like a 'physical' example.
On 3/15/19 3:00 PM, Jo wrote:
Good analysis Seirra,
I would not "reuse" route=roa
I can see *a lot* of shared routes in my area because most of the buses
heavily use a star topography (everything must take you to a central
station) as opposed to a hybrid mesh/star topography (everywhere has
access to a service to a central station, but there are circular routes
to allow
pet=permissive? although if the operator does straight out say 'pets
allowed' without any further suggestion (be it images, small print or
whatever) I guess it would be yes until proven otherwise or further
explained/surveyed. if this does get put in an article it may be worth
noting that it's
I'm guessing it depends on how specific the authority is. on the one
hand you'd think it'd usually just be either birds or no birds however I
imagine the distinction may still crop up. as I can't actually see any
article saying about animals used as access tags, I imagine it's just
tag as you
larity, but better fits source data.
Il gio 7 mar 2019, 14:09 seirra blake <mailto:sophietheopos...@yandex.com>> ha scritto:
while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still
make more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace
species/related things
I never saw that in access before, but that actually makes a lot of
sense. conditionals are somewhat underutilised where I live so I always
forget about them, but that's a fair point
On 3/7/19 9:58 PM, Warin wrote:
On 08/03/19 00:07, seirra blake wrote:
while I can't see a problem
while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still make
more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace species/related things
under it similar to the access tag. use cases I can think of:
* pets=no | no matter what, no pets
* pets=yes | open to all or at least most pets
some providers already make it publicly available knowledge. for example
in the UK link ATM has an app, and you can use it to find nearby ATMs.
most of the things it tells you are pretty standard, but some things
that may need new tags are pin management services, audio assistance and
£5 notes
seconded, we have it here in the city centre, it's an electric LED
display that shows the free spaces in real time (or just says full). in
our case it is integrated into the road sign
On 01/19/19 14:25, OSMDoudou wrote:
> Tag the capacity of the car park itself. It's more useful.
I think
this does feel like a much easier to understand idea now, it may be
worth thinking of a way to still incorporate the interval in the second
proposed feature, for example a local bus in my area has one every 10
minutes for a substantial amount of time.
On 10/31/18 21:04, Leif Rasmussen wrote:
do you want to tag these properties? To my opinion, no one needs to justify
tags regarding to usefulness, I'm just curios.
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2018 um 10:17 Uhr
Von: seirra
An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Tagging suggestions for electricity
yeah that is what i
if these firms buy it directly from the network .. or
some other body that then sees to the network and the power generators
as separate things.
On 31/08/18 17:43, seirra wrote:
just something to mention about distribution companies here anyway,
we have the network, then we have the company
just something to mention about distribution companies here anyway, we
have the network, then we have the company? so for example my network is
UK power network, but my company is utilita? however in other areas
(still in the uk) they would have a different network altogether
On 08/31/18
of a socket (and often all the same type) i imagine there might be a
difficult overlap is all
On 08/29/18 10:37, Dolly Andriatsiferana wrote:
Thanks seirra for pointing to power_supply. But I don't know if it can
really be applied to individual private buildings? Because as far as I
understand
you might find power_supply to be better suited as it is already
documented https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power_supply it
already covers all of those topics except for intermittent, although if
it is relevant i don't see why you can't put it
On 08/29/18 05:46, Dolly Andriatsiferana
Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018, 06:36 seirra <mailto:gene...@sarifria.x10.bz>> wrote:
hello, i was wondering what would be the best way to tag a metal
platform? for example the metal staircases that are at times used for
apartments/used for access/maintenance
You mean
hello, i was wondering what would be the best way to tag a metal
platform? for example the metal staircases that are at times used for
apartments/used for access/maintenance
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
, Aug 24, 2018 at 6:38 PM, seirra <mailto:gene...@sarifria.x10.bz>> wrote:
i would imagine it would be better having some data over none though?
Incomplete data is better than no data. Incorrect data is worse than
no data. The problem with this is that
incomplete (or even compl
after we got a consensus on tagging this. the cashback
thing would make sense though right? that's relatively constant. For the
ATMs do you think it would be better if we got a vote on it?
On 08/24/18 17:58, Paul Allen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 3:38 PM, seirra <mailto:gene...@sarifria.
i can confirm this to be the case. where i work the cashback procedure
is indeed just a signature of the receipt. As far as i know ATMs that
issue £5 notes tend to for a long time, i don't recall any here suddenly
stopping. source on why it may be valuable information to some (note the
small
Is there a way to put what currency denomination they output? for
example: whilst every cash machine here should theoretically output
£20/£10 notes, there are a growing number that output £5 notes
(obviously allowing the user to withdraw multiples of 5 rather than just
multiples of 10). I
the database be with every delivery service was mapped?
DaveF
On 23/08/2018 16:34, seirra wrote:
hello, i was wondering if there was any established way to record
delivery areas? would i be correct to think relations would be the
best method
hello, i was wondering if there was any established way to record
delivery areas? would i be correct to think relations would be the best
method?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
yeah, if it did get mapped it should probably at least be something specific
otherwise the user has no idea what to watch out for, and it may unreasonably
deter people from the area, i think it might be the same reason reviews aren't
recorded?outside of that i don't think osm performs live
oh okay yeah i get it!
On Aug 17 2018, at 4:17 pm, Jmapb wrote:
>
> On 8/16/2018 6:39 PM, seirra wrote:
> > if a floor of a building is for example: a store at the bottom of the
> > building, and the rest is apartments... shouldn't it then be a
> > building labelled as
:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 19. Aug 2018, at 13:32, seirra (https://link.getmailspring.com/link/58d81cc2-f042-224a-fbae-fc49e84df...@sarifria.x10.bz/0?redirect=mailto%3Ageneral%40sarifria.x10.bz=dGFnZ2luZ0BvcGVuc3RyZWV0bWFwLm9yZw%3D%3D)>
> wrote:
> > i don't mean amen
i don't mean amenity=parking_space... i mean parking_space=disabled
On 18/08/18 00:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 17. Aug 2018, at 09:45, seirra <mailto:gene...@sarifria.x10.bz>> wrote:
is parking_space even a valid tag though?(i can't see any docu
it is there and thus should be avoided (i hope i'm not offending,
although i respect the final decision i really don't understand)
On 08/17/18 18:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
Then you're just splitting class and race hairs.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 11:20 seirra <mailto:gene...@sarifria.x10.bz>&
:10, seirra wrote:
should these be split into two separate door elements, or should it be
tagged as just a really wide door?
Assuming we're talking about a hinged door with multiple wings, there's
a proposed door:wings key with 178 uses at the time of writing. Using
that, you would simply add
this was more somewhere with a dedicated room really
On 08/17/18 14:29, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 13:04 +0100, seirra wrote:
what should a games room (think things like darts, pool/snooker,
card
games) be tagged as? when i looked around i couldn't seem to find
any
official
there can be notable areas though, outside of what may usually be expected
On 08/17/18 16:03, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018, 16:35 seirra <mailto:gene...@sarifria.x10.bz>> wrote:
hmmm i do see the point there about racial/class bias... i was
thinking more ab
should these be split into two separate door elements, or should it be
tagged as just a really wide door?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
what should a games room (think things like darts, pool/snooker, card
games) be tagged as? when i looked around i couldn't seem to find any
official consensus or unofficial for that matter
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 17. Aug 2018, at 00:25, seirra wrote:
lives they say if someone sees your phone it gets stolen? so safety:phone=no
could be a good example?
like you have to take special care of your phone, but don’t worry for your
money or your car, they’re only
I was thinking more if a specific crime happens often enough to be
attributed to a street/building. by overlaid I'm guessing you mean as in
third party like mentioned earlier?
On 08/17/18 00:36, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On 08/16/2018 02:32 PM, seirra wrote:
Hello, i was wondering whether
:
On 17/08/18 08:25, seirra wrote:
i did originally mean more for example if an area is known for a
specific crime... listing it there? for example where a friend of
mine lives they say if someone sees your phone it gets stolen? so
safety:phone=no could be a good example? i can think of other
Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 17. Aug 2018, at 00:39, seirra wrote:
where a point clearly defines a building in these areas should it be corrected?
also if a floor of a building is for example: a store at the bottom of the
building, and the rest is apartments... shouldn't
be the only example of actual
rendering, should we first see if we can get the developers to
transition to rendering the disabled tag before we change it?
On 08/17/18 00:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 17. Aug 2018, at 00:19, seirra wrote:
also i saw some cases of ac
oh! before i go to bed just one last one, when correcting some typos or
wrong use of tagging i've noticed a few locations that used points
rather than directly applying the feature to the building (as in no
buildings having features at all as if it was an agreed style)... most
notably:
italy
i did originally mean more for example if an area is known for a
specific crime... listing it there? for example where a friend of mine
lives they say if someone sees your phone it gets stolen? so
safety:phone=no could be a good example? i can think of other examples
such as specific streets
m>>:
On 17/08/18 07:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 16. Aug 2018, at 23:35, seirra mailto:gene...@sarifria.x10.bz>> wrote:
>>
>> should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or
should
alright, when i get the time i'll correct them and link to this
discussion, perhaps tomorrow if i remember
On 08/16/18 22:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 16. Aug 2018, at 23:35, seirra wrote:
should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or should
should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or should it
be considered a stylistic choice?
On 08/16/18 22:29, marc marc wrote:
Le 16. 08. 18 à 21:42, seirra a écrit :
another query, for access:disabled should the correct usage for a
standard disabled parking space
ink of class and racial biases.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018, 14:35 seirra <mailto:gene...@sarifria.x10.bz>> wrote:
Hello, i was wondering whether there was a way to tag areas that
may be
risky/dangerous to walk in? i can think of a few streets that
could use
the tag, wa
another query, for access:disabled should the correct usage for a
standard disabled parking space be designated or yes? the usage is mixed
so i'm unsure... i'm sticking with designated for now (it's 'designated'
to a disabled driver)
___
Tagging
Hello, i was wondering whether there was a way to tag areas that may be
risky/dangerous to walk in? i can think of a few streets that could use
the tag, was there anything of the sort that has been agreed on?
___
Tagging mailing list
52 matches
Mail list logo
