I'm not a natural speaker, head like in where the aerialway is heading.
I propose the second scheme because of the duplicate meaning with ele in the
definition, and because the aim of an aerialway could be lower than mid.
Yves
Le 14 août 2020 17:32:08 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
I strongly prefer up/top over head.
At least for me (not representative,
not a native speaker), head = up
is not clear.
14 Aug 2020, 17:05 by em...@daniel-korn.de:
> Am 14.08.2020 um 16:37 schrieb yvecai:
>
>
>>
>> I would propose, if you want to use altitude as a definition:
>>
>>
>>>
We really should avoid words like "usually. " If there exceptions to the
elevation critérium, or if other factors are significant in working out the
correct value, then this also needs documenting...
On 14 August 2020 17:05:37 CEST, dktue wrote:
>Am 14.08.2020 um 16:37 schrieb yvecai:
>>
>>
Am 14.08.2020 um 16:37 schrieb yvecai:
I would propose, if you want to use altitude as a definition:
bottom: the end station with the lower altitude
up: the end station with the higher altitude
mid: any station, not being a base or a head station, irrespective
of the altitude
I would propose, if you want to use altitude as a definition:
bottom: the end station with the lower altitude
up: the end station with the higher altitude
mid: any station, not being a base or a head station, irrespective
of the altitude
Or, alternatively one that does not compete
Am 14.08.2020 um 14:51 schrieb Colin Smale:
On 2020-08-14 13:55, dktue wrote:
Am 14.08.2020 um 13:34 schrieb Colin Smale:
On 2020-08-14 13:14, dktue wrote:
Am 14.08.2020 um 13:11 schrieb Yves:
Base / mid / head?
I'm definitely open for that! :-)
OK, two people agree
On 2020-08-14 13:55, dktue wrote:
> Am 14.08.2020 um 13:34 schrieb Colin Smale:
>
> On 2020-08-14 13:14, dktue wrote:
> Am 14.08.2020 um 13:11 schrieb Yves: Base / mid / head? I'm definitely open
> for that! :-)
OK, two people agree on the strings to use, but what are the semantics?
What
Am 14.08.2020 um 13:34 schrieb Colin Smale:
On 2020-08-14 13:14, dktue wrote:
Am 14.08.2020 um 13:11 schrieb Yves:
Base / mid / head?
I'm definitely open for that! :-)
OK, two people agree on the strings to use, but what are the
semantics? What sentence would go in the wiki to describe
On 2020-08-14 13:14, dktue wrote:
> Am 14.08.2020 um 13:11 schrieb Yves:
>
>> Base / mid / head?
> I'm definitely open for that! :-)
OK, two people agree on the strings to use, but what are the semantics?
What sentence would go in the wiki to describe a) when to use the value
and b) what the
Am 14.08.2020 um 13:11 schrieb Yves:
Base / mid / head?
I'm definitely open for that! :-)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Base / mid / head?
Le 14 août 2020 10:59:11 GMT+02:00, dktue a écrit :
>
>Am 14.08.2020 um 10:53 schrieb yvecai:
>> On 14.08.20 10:40, dktue wrote:
I would define it as:
lower_station: station that has the lowest elevation (exact
elevation is not necessary to know, it's
14 Aug 2020, 10:53 by y...@mailbox.org:
> On 14.08.20 10:40, dktue wrote:
>
>>> I would define it as:
>>>
>>> lower_station: station that has the lowest elevation (exact elevation is
>>> not necessary to know, it's obvious)
>>> upper_station: station that has the highest elevation
>>>
Am 14.08.2020 um 10:53 schrieb yvecai:
On 14.08.20 10:40, dktue wrote:
I would define it as:
lower_station: station that has the lowest elevation (exact
elevation is not necessary to know, it's obvious)
upper_station: station that has the highest elevation
mid_station: any other station
I
On 14.08.20 10:40, dktue wrote:
I would define it as:
lower_station: station that has the lowest elevation (exact elevation
is not necessary to know, it's obvious)
upper_station: station that has the highest elevation
mid_station: any other station
I want to add: At least in Germany,
Am 14.08.2020 um 10:35 schrieb dktue:
Am 14.08.2020 um 10:28 schrieb yvecai:
On 14.08.20 10:00, dktue wrote:
So why oppose to the suggested tagging of
station=lower_station/mid_station/upper_station? What harm would
this cause?
There is concerns expressed by the tag value lower/upper
Am 14.08.2020 um 10:28 schrieb yvecai:
On 14.08.20 10:00, dktue wrote:
So why oppose to the suggested tagging of
station=lower_station/mid_station/upper_station? What harm would this
cause?
There is concerns expressed by the tag value lower/upper that imply
the elevation difference, do
On 14.08.20 10:00, dktue wrote:
So why oppose to the suggested tagging of
station=lower_station/mid_station/upper_station? What harm would this
cause?
There is concerns expressed by the tag value lower/upper that imply the
elevation difference, do you want to tag this difference or
Am 13.08.2020 um 19:06 schrieb Colin Smale:
On 2020-08-13 18:35, Werner.Haag@leitstelle.tirol wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion (i think dktue is right there) it should be easy for a
user to distinguish or extract (overpass query) the upper, mid and
lower stations.
That´s not possible at the
Am 13.08.2020 um 19:06 schrieb Colin Smale:
On 2020-08-13 18:35, Werner.Haag@leitstelle.tirol wrote:
Hi,
in my opinion (i think dktue is right there) it should be easy for a
user to distinguish or extract (overpass query) the upper, mid and
lower stations.
That´s not possible at the
On 2020-08-13 19:41, Yves wrote:
> If top, middle, bottom have a meaning for the OP, I'm not sure it's really
> general, counter-examples have been given.
It's not the OP's private project, there is a reason why this is being
debated in public.
> To avoid confusion with elevation, what would
If top, middle, bottom have a meaning for the OP, I'm not sure it's really
general, counter-examples have been given.
To avoid confusion with elevation, what would be another way to tag them?
Motor position have been given, but it is not really relevant for the common
user.
For routing
On 2020-08-13 18:35, Werner.Haag@leitstelle.tirol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in my opinion (i think dktue is right there) it should be easy for a user to
> distinguish or extract (overpass query) the upper, mid and lower stations.
> That´s not possible at the moment in OSM. Elevation (ele tag) may be
Hi,in my opinion (i think dktue is right there) it should be easy for a user to distinguish or extract (overpass query) the upper, mid and lower stations.That´s not possible at the moment in OSM. Elevation (ele tag) may be useful, but does not indicate whether a station is the lower or upper
23 matches
Mail list logo
