Am 14.08.2020 um 10:35 schrieb dktue:
Am 14.08.2020 um 10:28 schrieb yvecai:
On 14.08.20 10:00, dktue wrote:
So why oppose to the suggested tagging of
station=lower_station/mid_station/upper_station? What harm would
this cause?
There is concerns expressed by the tag value lower/upper that imply
the elevation difference, do you want to tag this difference or
someting else? In other word, can you draft here the definition for
those values ?
Yves
I would define it as:
lower_station: station that has the lowest elevation (exact elevation
is not necessary to know, it's obvious)
upper_station: station that has the highest elevation
mid_station: any other station
I want to add: At least in Germany, Switzerland and Austria there are
well-established german words which you often find in the name of the
stations themselves:
* "Talstation" ("valley station")
* "Bergstation" ("mountain station"), sometimes also "Gipfelstation"
("summit station")
* "Mittelstation" ("mid station")
There should be a machine-readeably tagging to get this information that
is so often encoded in the name. That's why I'm suggesting this tagging.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
