Hello,
Some time ago a proposal to change the way we specify types of power
generators was passed. Unfortunately, the German, Russian, French and
Japanese translations haven't been updated. I left requests on their
respective discussion pages but nothing has happened.
The original English page
Am 22.11.2010 10:26, schrieb Tom Chance:
Hello,
Some time ago a proposal to change the way we specify types of power
generators was passed. Unfortunately, the German, Russian, French and
Japanese translations haven't been updated.
Hi Tom!
Please revert the changes in the english page!
A
On 22 November 2010 09:36, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 22.11.2010 10:26, schrieb Tom Chance:
Some time ago a proposal to change the way we specify types of power
generators was passed. Unfortunately, the German, Russian, French and
Japanese translations haven't been
Tom Chance wrote:
When that happens, the only logical course of action is to update the
wiki documentation showing the new tags and removing the
deprecated tags. It makes no sense to continue telling people about
deprecated tags.
Even accepting that there is such a thing as a deprecated
On 22 November 2010 12:49, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Tom Chance wrote:
When that happens, the only logical course of action is to update the
wiki documentation showing the new tags and removing the
deprecated tags. It makes no sense to continue telling people about
2010/11/22 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Tom Chance wrote:
When that happens, the only logical course of action is to update the
wiki documentation showing the new tags and removing the
deprecated tags. It makes no sense to continue telling people about
deprecated tags.
Even
Am 22.11.2010 10:49, schrieb Tom Chance:
Ulf, the proposal introduced a new set of tags to specify the type of
power=generator, deprecating two existing tags. The new set of tags is
more powerful and loses none of the detail made possible by the old tags.
I'm not gonna argue with you, wether
Ulf Lamping napsal(a):
First of all, please repeat a hundred times on the blackboard: There's
no such thing as a deprecated tag in OSM. Especially not, if the new
proposal is only a few weeks old ;-)
Sure there are deprecated tags in OSM - it doesn't mean that they are
not used in the database
Am 22.11.2010 22:28, schrieb Petr Morávek [Xificurk]:
Ulf Lamping napsal(a):
First of all, please repeat a hundred times on the blackboard: There's
no such thing as a deprecated tag in OSM. Especially not, if the new
proposal is only a few weeks old ;-)
Sure there are deprecated tags in OSM -
Ulf Lamping napsal(a):
Am 22.11.2010 22:28, schrieb Petr Morávek [Xificurk]:
Ulf Lamping napsal(a):
First of all, please repeat a hundred times on the blackboard: There's
no such thing as a deprecated tag in OSM. Especially not, if the new
proposal is only a few weeks old ;-)
Sure there are
Ulf Lamping wrote:
If the mappers think your proposal is a good idea they will use it.
If the page for power=generator contains a large table with power
sources and tags for these, most mappers will use those. Even if there
is a link to an alternative proposal somewhere else on the page.
So
2010/11/22 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Am 22.11.2010 10:49, schrieb Tom Chance:
When that happens, the only logical course of action is to update the
wiki documentation showing the new tags and removing the deprecated
tags. It makes no sense to continue telling people about
2010/11/22 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Am 22.11.2010 22:28, schrieb Petr Morávek [Xificurk]:
Sure, there are tags that you could call deprecated, highway=minor would be
an example - no one would actually encourage to use this tag any more.
well, the wiki does, it says: under way
13 matches
Mail list logo
