Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On 11.06.2018 10:29, Rory McCann wrote: > I suggest adding `sauna=gay`, for a gay bathhouse. "gay" is a > simplification since many men who have sex with men visit them (not just > gay men). `sauna=msm` sounds clinical and might be not obvious to data > users. > > In some countries (like Germany)

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On 11.06.2018 19:28, Jyri-Petteri Paloposki wrote: Number eight sounds like it would fit in this ”experience”, so we should probably add that one. Is there a western spelling for that? The romanization reads Jjimjilbang https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jjimjilbang

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On 11.06.2018 12:17, Max wrote: > Great idea to make the sauna key more useful. But it should be looked at > in more detail and with less of a Finnish bias. :) > > Some questions that the tag should address: > > 1. How to tag a place which has several individual saunas? > 1b. What about other

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

Great idea to make the sauna key more useful. But it should be looked at in more detail and with less of a Finnish bias. :) Some questions that the tag should address: 1. How to tag a place which has several individual saunas? 1b. What about other sauna related amenities like cold pools (how

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

I suggest to distinguish the key for the operation mode (hot, steam etc) from those for the expected user group and dress code. On 11.06.2018 09:29, Rory McCann wrote: I suggest adding `sauna=gay`, for a gay bathhouse. "gay" is a simplification since many men who have sex with men visit them

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

I suggest adding `sauna=gay`, for a gay bathhouse. "gay" is a simplification since many men who have sex with men visit them (not just gay men). `sauna=msm` sounds clinical and might be not obvious to data users. In some countries (like Germany) saunas are always naked, in others (e.g. Ireland)

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

It might be interesting to tag the presence of a cold plunge pool/dunking pool. > -Original Message- > From: Jyri-Petteri Paloposki > Sent: Monday, 11 June 2018 01:47 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna > >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On 10.06.2018 18:34, Johnparis wrote: > You might (or might not) want to reconcile this with > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bath Thanks for the suggestion! A sauna, at least in Finland, is quite different from a public bath. These two might of course exist in the same

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

You might (or might not) want to reconcile this with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bath On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Jyri-Petteri Paloposki < jyri-petteri.palopo...@iki.fi> wrote: > On 10.06.2018 16:14, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: > > If you are

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On 10.06.2018 16:14, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: > If you are tagging one individual leisure=sauna, it makes sense that the > sauna key has only one value. > > But if you are tagging sauna=* on a hotel or other larger object that > contains a sauna, there might be different ones

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

> Sent: Sunday, 10 June 2018 22:36 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna > > On 10.06.2018 15:14, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > What is the point of adding sauna=yes to leisure=sauna? > > None. sauna=yes is currently a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On 10.06.2018 15:14, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > What is the point of adding sauna=yes to leisure=sauna? None. sauna=yes is currently apparently used when tagging other features than leisure=sauna that also have a sauna (hotels etc.) I amended the proposed description to state that sauna=yes

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

10. Jun 2018 14:01 by jyri-petteri.palopo...@iki.fi : > Hi, > > proposing a new (or actually amended) use of the sauna key to specify > which kind of sauna the leisure=sauna is. The proposal can be found in >

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

Hi, proposing a new (or actually amended) use of the sauna key to specify which kind of sauna the leisure=sauna is. The proposal can be found in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sauna. The proposed values as of now are as follows: – sauna=yes General purpose value –

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote: Hi Kim, why exactly do you want to convert a widely used tag (amenity=sauna, ~1000 uses) to a very rarely used tag (leisure=sauna, ~13 uses). Agreed. Unless there is something very clearly broken with the naming of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

2010/8/28 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: On 27 August 2010 23:34, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote: why exactly do you want to convert a widely used tag (amenity=sauna, ~1000 uses) I wouldn't exactly say 1000 uses is widely used... A handful of mappers, or perhaps even a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On 28 August 2010 18:58, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I can hardly imagine a single mapper (or even a small group) mapping more than 1000 saunas, but this is maybe due to the area I'm living in, where there are few of them. If someone had a fetish for saunas and had a GPX

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

2010/8/28 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: On 28 August 2010 18:58, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I can hardly imagine a single mapper (or even a small group) mapping more than 1000 saunas, but this is maybe due to the area I'm living in, where there are few of them.

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

Hello, There is plans to replace amenity=sauna with leisure=sauna. Also usage access in combination is proposed. Feel free to discuss about the map feature at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sauna Br, Kim S ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

Hi Kim, why exactly do you want to convert a widely used tag (amenity=sauna, ~1000 uses) to a very rarely used tag (leisure=sauna, ~13 uses). The Proposal does not tell why this change is required. Peter Am 27.08.2010 14:31, schrieb Kim Slotte: Hello, There is plans to replace

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sauna

On 27 August 2010 23:34, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote: why exactly do you want to convert a widely used tag (amenity=sauna, ~1000 uses) I wouldn't exactly say 1000 uses is widely used... A handful of mappers, or perhaps even a single mapper, is capable of doing more than that...