ap traffic-light controlled crossing OR junction anyway. It would be an addition on information, I think.
--Lukas
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. April 2020 um 03:48 Uhr
Von: "Jarek Piórkowski"
An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=cross
On 15/04/2020 09:27, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
On Apr 15, 2020, at 8:34 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
The traffic lights control the junction
We have a lot of traffic light controlled crossings in Japan that are
just for a crosswalk, while the smaller intersecting road is stop-sign
controlled
On 15/04/2020 05:33, lukas-...@web.de wrote:
Okay, so this is what I think, too and maybe I would clarify this in the
wiki then.
But I think in some cases it still wouldn't be clear, because what would
be about mapping this then:
: "John Willis via Tagging"
An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Cc: "John Willis"
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand
On Apr 15, 2020, at 8:34 PM, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote:
The
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 8:34 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> The traffic lights control the junction
We have a lot of traffic light controlled crossings in Japan that are just for
a crosswalk, while the smaller intersecting road is stop-sign controlled for
cars. Only the crosswalk is controlled by
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 10:36, wrote:
> Which was mentioned a few posts before? The traffic lights control the
> junction, but people might say that the same one single traffic light is
> controlling the pedestrian crossing and the junction...
>
I would say that it is controlling the crossing
uot;Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 10:00, wrote:
> So in which cases "highway=traffic_signals + crossing=traffic_signals on the same node" should be used?
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 10:00, wrote:
> So in which cases "highway=traffic_signals + crossing=traffic_signals on the
> same node" should be used? Only for the "crossing only-traffic lights" I
> mentioned?
Yeah, personally I would agree with that. Only on
pedestrian/cycle-crossing-only traffic
the "crossing only-traffic lights" I mentioned?
--Lukas
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. April 2020 um 15:43 Uhr
Von: "Jarek Piórkowski"
An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_dem
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 06:23, wrote:
>
> To response on the mentioning:
> "Currently the wiki page says "traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand makes
> it easy to mark all traffic lights which do only control a crossing",
> again I personally find highway=traffic_signals +
> crossing=traffic_signals
responsible.Maybe we would need another key like "waiting_time" for that then, but I think it often depends on traffic situation and maybe can be changed during the daytime by a controlling center etc.
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. April 2020 um 12:27 Uhr
Von: "Martin Koppe
Am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020 um 14:16 Uhr schrieb :
> Hi,
> oh sorry you are confused. Maybe it's too much text I think. But your
> conclusion is completely correct, yes.
>
>
Did you have a look at the currently used values for traffic_signals?
ot;Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand
What's the difference between
highway=traffic_signals plus button_poperated=yes
and
highway=traffic_signals plus traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand
e: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand
What's the difference between
highway=traffic_signals plus button_poperated=yes
and
highway=traffic_signals plus traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand
?
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 02:55, Jarek Piórkowski <ja.
What's the difference between
highway=traffic_signals plus button_poperated=yes
and
highway=traffic_signals plus traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand
?
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 02:55, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 12:56, Paul Allen wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 17:43,
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 12:56, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 17:43, wrote:
>> The second goal my proposal wants to message is to deprecate tagging
>> "crossing=traffic_signals" together with "highway=traffic_signals" on the
>> same node. Especially if you're saying this is a full
. April 2020 um 20:16 Uhr
Von: "Mark Wagner"
An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:42:42 +0200
lukas-...@web.de wrote:
> The second goal my proposal wants to message is to deprecate taggin
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:42:42 +0200
lukas-...@web.de wrote:
> The second goal my proposal wants to message is to deprecate tagging
> "crossing=traffic_signals" together with "highway=traffic_signals" on
> the same node. Especially if you're saying this is a full crossing
> mapped. It breaks the
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 17:43, wrote:
> The second goal my proposal wants to message is to deprecate tagging
> "crossing=traffic_signals" together with "highway=traffic_signals" on the
> same node. Especially if you're saying this is a full crossing mapped. It
> breaks the highway=crossing -
n JOSM. Or for mapping traffic signals for crossing cyclists. But I think in every case it is better to use two different (nearby) nodes for that.
What do you think about it?
Lukas
Gesendet: Montag, 13. April 2020 um 14:14 Uhr
Von: lukas-...@web.de
An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Bet
Hi,
oh sorry you are confused. Maybe it's too much text I think. But your conclusion is completely correct, yes.
Gesendet: Montag, 13. April 2020 um 13:47 Uhr
Von: "Andrew Davidson"
An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Fe
I'm a bit confused by your proposal, but it would seem to me that what you
want to do is add crossing_on_demand to the list of values for the key
traffic_signals. Is this correct?
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:10 PM wrote:
> Hi people,
> I made a proposal to reform the tagging of those traffic
Hi people,
I made a proposal to reform the tagging of those traffic signals, which do only control a crossing. The proposal has two main messages: First that crossing=traffic_signals is every time a strict under-tag of highway=crossing and should not be used on the same node with
23 matches
Mail list logo
