[Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks

2011-04-24 Thread Flaimo
i have started a proposal for simple automated tasks. i will leave it in the RFC state until someone, who knows how to create a bot, can provide a prototype for a small imited bbox, so we can see if this one is actually doable (performance and security wise).

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks

2011-04-24 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/4/24 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com: i have started a proposal for simple automated tasks. i will leave it in the RFC state until someone, who knows how to create a bot, can provide a prototype for a small imited bbox, so we can see if this one is actually doable (performance and security wise).

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks

2011-04-24 Thread Serge Wroclawski
I think the number of tags in this kind of proposal would balloon quickly, so let me suggest instead that tags of this nature be put on the changeset, with a then request to bot authors to check object history and changesets, rather than more tags on the object. In other words, use the changeset

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks

2011-04-24 Thread Flaimo
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:41:12 -0400 From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks I think the  number of tags in this kind of proposal would balloon quickly, so let me suggest instead that tags of this nature be put