André Pirard wrote:
The only thing I could find is indeed a guidepost like this experiment
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.53271mlon=5.63878#map=18/50.53271/5.63878layers=N,
but often the guidepost is virtual.
* information
Hiking trail relations and other route relations have already been mapped
with the role start on elements at the start of the route (often a
guidepost). I suggest you stick to that and try fomalizing it. end seems
a good role for the end.
lørdag 10. august 2013 skrev Fernando Trebien følgende:
Trailheads are not necessarily start/end or associated with a particular
trail. It's more like a train station, a place you go to change from
one transport mode to another, from which perhaps multiple trails can be
accessed.
pgpv5kHKK4rzr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Hiking tracks as POIs in Brazil
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I also think that a trailhead tag is needed.
-1
I don't believe that implicitly determining trailheads will work.
Why not ? Eventually, enhance the route relation
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
What you are looking for is a tagging for trailhead I suppose.
Are these trails signed (trailblazed)?
I notice that the National Park OSM initiative does not propose an OSM tag
for their trailhead sign (see:
I agree. I have mapped some hiking trails in Korea and noticed there
is nothing specific to mark the start of a trail.
I suppose it could be done programmatically. It is clear which node
is the first one, so it could be rendered differently, with extra
detail extracted from the tags on the
Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com writes:
I suppose it could be done programmatically. It is clear which node
is the first one, so it could be rendered differently, with extra
detail extracted from the tags on the track itself. However,
explicit is better than implicit, so I'd like to
If hiking trails are foot route relations, then perhaps trailhead
(or more generically head) could be a role in the relation marking
where it starts.
I think trailhead=yes would work in a node to which you could assign a
name tag for the trail. (This is similar to how I've tagged named
entrances
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I also think that a trailhead tag is needed.
-1
I don't believe that implicitly determining trailheads will work.
Why not ? Eventually, enhance the route relation with a specific
element/role (e.g. roundtrips).
A trailhead is
. This is
certainly very helpful when seeking to find footpaths that need mapping.
Regards
Dudley
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 19:47:37 +0200
From: pier...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Hiking tracks as POIs in Brazil
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Greg Troxel g
On 2013-08-09 07:57, Henning Scholland wrote :
Hi,
I don't think that kind a sign with a label hiking path starts is a
attraction. Maybe you are locking for something like this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost
Similar to this thread, my concern is that there's
Hello,
OSM currently has no hiking tracks mapped in Brazil. We are now
receiving (copyright-free) POIs of hiking tracks (representing where
they start) from a local mapping community (which gathered this data
for over a decade). Unfortunately, we do not have the details of the
tracks yet, but I
What you are looking for is a tagging for trailhead I suppose.
Are these trails signed (trailblazed)?
I notice that the National Park OSM initiative does not propose an OSM tag
for their trailhead sign (see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Park_Service_Tagging)
I personally would
Hi,
I don't think that kind a sign with a label hiking path starts is a
attraction. Maybe you are locking for something like this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost
Henning
___
Tagging mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
