On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
Setting it to 1s has the drawback of point clouds when you stand still (I
> used to stop recording every time I stopped moving, but admittedly it
> requires attention, also when you continue moving to set it back to rec).
>
That depends on
sent from a phone
> On 2. Dec 2020, at 05:30, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Only in places where local mappers have mapped most things that the details
> are mapped better are 'accuracies' of some discussion.
yes, generally I agree that any of the gps settings from the more
On 1/12/20 9:36 pm, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2020-12-01 11:14, Warin wrote:
The differences are less than 10m. (The points of the green track are
where data exists, the straight lines between those points simply
connect the measured points. )
The 'simplify way' in JOSM is normal set for a
On 1/12/20 9:43 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 1. Dec 2020, at 11:18, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
The 'Auto' setting may not be 'optimal' for what you want, but as a compromise
between data bloat and resolution/accuracy it maybe better than a fixed time as
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 11:18 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The 'Auto' setting may not be 'optimal' for what you want, but as a
> compromise between data bloat and resolution/accuracy it maybe better than
> a fixed time as judged by the developer/manufacture.
>
For not 'optimal' I mean
sent from a phone
> On 1. Dec 2020, at 11:18, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The 'Auto' setting may not be 'optimal' for what you want, but as a
> compromise between data bloat and resolution/accuracy it maybe better than a
> fixed time as judged by the developer/manufacture.
On 2020-12-01 11:14, Warin wrote:
> The differences are less than 10m. (The points of the green track are where
> data exists, the straight lines between those points simply connect the
> measured points. )
>
> The 'simplify way' in JOSM is normal set for a maximum difference of 3m as a
>
On 1/12/20 5:07 pm, Andrea Mazzoleni wrote:
Think your confusing two terms; resolution, accuracy
I understand that you mean, but check this detail: https://ibb.co/7ycFW5J
At least my impression is that the 1Sec is also more accurate. It's
obviously only a single test, and the recording
> Think your confusing two terms; resolution, accuracy
>
I understand that you mean, but check this detail: https://ibb.co/7ycFW5J
At least my impression is that the 1Sec is also more accurate. It's
obviously only a single test, and the recording happened at a different
time, so indeed it could
On 1/12/20 7:46 am, Andrea Mazzoleni wrote:
I recently wrote a series of diary entries about my experience
with the accuracy of one-device GPS precision. I concluded with a
comparison of three devices I had personal experience with
including a new Garmin GPSMAP 66sr which I
Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 14:36 Uhr schrieb Andrea Mazzoleni <
amadva...@gmail.com>:
> But most of the trails of my local area are under the woods (low mountain)
> and the GPS is the only source of information.
>
you can use any tag like "source" or "note" to try to convey to the
following
>
> I recently wrote a series of diary entries about my experience with the
> accuracy of one-device GPS precision. I concluded with a comparison of
> three devices I had personal experience with including a new Garmin GPSMAP
> 66sr which I posted here:
>
I recently wrote a series of diary entries about my experience with the
accuracy of one-device GPS precision. I concluded with a comparison of
three devices I had personal experience with including a new Garmin GPSMAP
66sr which I posted here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bobwz/diary/394711
Nov 30, 2020, 14:33 by amadva...@gmail.com:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:27 PM Warin <> 61sundow...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>
>> imagery may well be better than survey by consumer GPS
>>
> I agree. Where an image is available I always use it as reference. But most
> of the trails of my local
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:27 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the intention is to indicate the error/accuracy/uncertainty then
> tag/state that. The better GPS devices give indications of this
> error/accuracy/uncertainty.
>
The big advantage of the dualband is not (only) the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:11 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I would use "survey using high quality dualband GPS (accuracy with X m)"
> to make it clearly understandable.
>
This sounds like a good idea.
___
On 30/11/20 8:45 am, Andrea Mazzoleni wrote:
Hi,
I bought a tracking device that supports GPS dualband (also called
dual frequency) for high precision mapping, and I'm wondering if I can
put this information in the "source" tag.
The intention is to make future mappers consider the device
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 10:45:13PM +0100, Andrea Mazzoleni wrote:
> The intention is to make future mappers consider the device precision when
> doing corrections.
My experience is that many mappers, especially armchair mappers, ignore
source tags. I often find that my fairly accurate gps mapping
I would use "survey using high quality dualband GPS (accuracy with X m)"
to make it clearly understandable.
Most people would be unaware of meaning of "GPS dualband"
(I ma quite interested in this topic and I am unsure what is the accuracy
difference, especially as there massive differences in
Hi,
I bought a tracking device that supports GPS dualband (also called dual
frequency) for high precision mapping, and I'm wondering if I can put this
information in the "source" tag.
The intention is to make future mappers consider the device precision when
doing corrections.
Here some info
20 matches
Mail list logo
