Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-15 Thread Markus Lindholm
On 14 December 2012 18:41, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: Created a page on the wiki for this proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Provides_feature What purpose does the

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-15 Thread Erik Johansson
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 December 2012 18:41, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: Created a page on the wiki for this proposal

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-14 Thread Erik Johansson
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: Created a page on the wiki for this proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Provides_feature What purpose does the role=entrance have when the node/way is going to be tagged

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-09 Thread Markus Lindholm
Created a page on the wiki for this proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Provides_feature /Markus ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-07 Thread Pieren
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: Created first example of provides_feature http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2623059 Your relation type name provides_feature is too vague and could be used for all relations... Anyway, most of the

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-07 Thread Henning Scholland
Am 07.12.2012 10:27, schrieb Pieren: On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: Created first example of provides_feature http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2623059 Your relation type name provides_feature is too vague and could be used for all

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-07 Thread Henning Scholland
Am 06.12.2012 23:10, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: 2012/12/6 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com: Tags: type=provides_feature Members roles: target address entrance Comments? do you know the site relation? It might provide what you are after. I think it's the other way round.

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-07 Thread Henning Scholland
Am 06.12.2012 16:39, schrieb Markus Lindholm: Comments? Hi Markus, I think it's useful to have such a relation. But I would also include building-polygon, like: building entrance target address Maybe take a look at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Buildings which

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-07 Thread Markus Lindholm
On 7 December 2012 10:27, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: Created first example of provides_feature http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2623059 Your relation type name provides_feature is too vague and

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-07 Thread Markus Lindholm
On 7 December 2012 11:05, Henning Scholland o...@aighes.de wrote: Am 06.12.2012 16:39, schrieb Markus Lindholm: Comments? Hi Markus, I think it's useful to have such a relation. But I would also include building-polygon, like: building entrance target address So the semantics of the

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-07 Thread Greg Troxel
Dave Sutter sut...@intransix.com writes: This may be a radical suggestion for OSM but I think POIs should be removed from the map database and put in an external database. Each POI should have an address and the address is used to match the POI to the map. This can also be extended to ref

[Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-06 Thread Markus Lindholm
Few days ago there was a discussion on this list with the subject Door to door routing to buildings with multiple occupants. My thoughts after the discussion was that with increasing micro-mapping we need a relation to tie different objects together. So I thought I would make a proposal for such a

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-06 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 06.12.2012 16:39, Markus Lindholm wrote: Few days ago there was a discussion on this list with the subject Door to door routing to buildings with multiple occupants. My thoughts after the discussion was that with increasing micro-mapping we need a relation to tie different objects together.

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-06 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2012/12/6 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com: Tags: type=provides_feature Members roles: target address entrance Comments? do you know the site relation? It might provide what you are after. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-06 Thread Dave Sutter
This may be a radical suggestion for OSM but I think POIs should be removed from the map database and put in an external database. Each POI should have an address and the address is used to match the POI to the map. This can also be extended to ref tags, which are a generalized address, to add

Re: [Tagging] New relation type=provides_feature

2012-12-06 Thread Markus Lindholm
On 6 December 2012 23:10, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/12/6 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com: Tags: type=provides_feature Members roles: target address entrance Comments? do you know the site relation? It might provide what you are after. Yes, I